Barkha had it right to file a complaint and gather proof that Adhik is not to blame if Pakhi does do something extreme. Ravanraj is a brainless idiot and he has Paritrash as another bhakt. New Samar keeps flip-flopping, cannot estimate which side he will fall. In all this I did not understand where Samar stood when he said “jaise bade bohut sensible baate kar rahe hain” when Ankush asked Adhik and Pakhi to shut up and let the elders handle the situation. Who is he exactly blaming.
It was interesting that Anuj took a side and stood with Kapadia’s against Pakhi and Ravanraj. He is on his last legs of his patience with Shah drama. I did not get a clear picture of which way would Anuj would lean if Adhik-Pakhi did patch up. Is he okay if Adhik and Pakhi patch up or if he is not bothered one way or the other, it was not clearly stated. As Barkha would not want Adhik moving back to the rented house, where would they live. Is Anuj kicking all the extra Kapadia’s out or still giving them time to find a place of their own as shown after the Dimple track.
When Pakhi blamed Ravanraj for her the escalated situation and everyone called her out on it, I did not consider that as defending Ravanraj. Rather, it was to stop Pakhi from trying to deflect blame and responsibility of her doing, so that Pakhi does not escape from her responsibility in this mess. Barkha calling Pakhi out does not absolve her of being a co-conspirator during the Sangeet. Anuj and Anupamaa, Kavya, Hasmukh and Adhik calling Pakhi out and asking her to stop blame game, even Leela in that instance was not taking Ravanraj’s side. It was so that Pakhi does not deflect blame. Doesn’t mean Ravanraj is blameless ya dudh ka dhula that the makers keeps trying to push with the never ending white wash attempts.
Edited by TheSunShine - 2 years ago
6