Originally posted by: surabhi01
U are still on same track ki koi in laws apne property ka dabdaba dika ke bahu ko torture nahin kar sakta .
Woh agar in law ke naam property bhi na ho to bhi bahu ko torture nahin kar sakte
To aise kisne kaha ki agar in laws ka right hai ghar pe to bahu ko torture kar sakte hain
I was saying bahu ka legal right nahin hota hai in laws ke self accquired ghar pe thats it
But as usual u r taking my point to diferent direction like dabdaba and mental torture challenging so I am leaving it
Lol main point was bahu Kavya can speak or not about who can stay in her sasural !
You diverted it to the point that bahu Kavya can only speak if she has legal rights on the in-law acquired property otherwise she has no right to say no to mukku the business partner.
So I proved the point that law also allows to speak bahu Kavya in the household matter even if property is acquired by in laws only !
Hence it is proved that law and samaj nobody can ask bahu Kavya to shut up in the household matter just because property is acquired by in-laws!
18