Why do we come to IF? Whose serious? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Supermagical

I surely dont visit IF for taking lecture on fiction and my choice.

@Ace:Your example doesn't go with this forum, there male lead/ female lead were bashed and on Anamika forum only character of Rano was criticised for her typical drama and in turn members were mocked for their post presentation, typing style and fun chat wth their friends. I dont need to go far for posting any real example of so called neutral members who visits this forums with an agneda of mocking regular members (including you and TM). Have a look at TM's previous post and this post once again you will find 90% material on members and less about show and Who are these Rano fans who have given the right of defending their case to you? Cant they talk themselves?

Originally posted by: Voldermoth

Since, i don't bother reading about what crap gets written about me,i don't know if @supermagical is talking about me when she says TM...🤣

Even if it is it hardly bothers me.😆 Also don't know if @ace is defending or has defended me in this topic...if you have...thanks.😃

A couple of members have messaged me to stay away from this forum as they too find the concerned group attitude wrong.

Originally posted by: -Ace-

When people were up in arms to bash Rano or Annie Gill , they never thought that it might come back to them too. Now if anybody bashes Anamika , they get upset . Where were ur sensitive heart when you guys were involved in bashing the actress. If you didn't respect their feeling, then how do you expect same honor of them.

I hardly see posts that are on behalf of Rano and I hardly see bashing posts on Anamika. Very few members ( one or two ) bashes Anamika . But if we compare the number of bashing on Rano it would be at least 10:1 . If you guys can't tolerate few members who bashes Anamika, how do you guys think they (Rano fans ) tolerate such a large number of members bashing of Rano ?

I am not a Annie Gill's fan but I do support underdog !!

@Ace: Dear (for calling me dear) when it was denied that Rano wasn't criticized? We had and will do it again if she bores us with her drama, there is a difference between bashing fiction character and mocking/instigating real people this is what was done and is repeating neutralism is objecting all wrongs and not going after one group. Yes making entry on forum at time when forum atmosphere is violent and posting comment on the most controversial post further decorating decorum (several times no comments on posts made on show) is what I call an agenda. No hard feelings I found your attitude that way and posted it the way I perceived.

@TM: I did not know using word TM is that much surprising for you? Like you I don't bother over comments made on me and ignores it most of the time and since this time my choice is questioned once again I will reply back.

Well what kind of response were you wishing from us? Saying Yes to that post when we had disagreement? It was written there "time and again" and I asked for links, word "fight" was mentioned out there and I wrote "except this one" my comment continued with "evil wala love ho ya ishq wala love is far better than bacha love which bores me to the core" tell me whats wrong in this comment? Stating you choice and POV in your post is a crime? The problem was your looking at all comments from negative spectacles, we are different people from different backgrounds and thus presents our agreement/disagreement in different styles.

Originally posted by: Supermagical

@Ace: Dear (for calling me dear) when it was denied that Rano wasn't criticized? We had and will do it again if she bores us with her drama, there is a difference between bashing fiction character and mocking/instigating real people this is what was done and is repeating neutralism is objecting all wrongs and not going after one group. Yes making entry on forum at time when forum atmosphere is violent and posting comment on the most controversial post further decorating decorum (several times no comments on posts made on show) is what I call an agenda. No hard feelings I found your attitude that way and posted it the way I perceived.

@TM: I did not know using word TM is that much surprising for you? Like you I don't bother over comments made on me and ignores it most of the time and since this time my choice is questioned once again I will reply back.

Well what kind of response were you wishing from us? Saying Yes to that post when we had disagreement? It was written there "time and again" and I asked for links, word "fight" was mentioned out there and I wrote "except this one" my comment continued with "evil wala love ho ya ishq wala love is far better than bacha love which bores me to the core" tell me whats wrong in this comment? Stating you choice and POV in your post is a crime? The problem was your looking at all comments from negative spectacles, we are different people from different backgrounds and thus presents our agreement/disagreement in different styles.

P.s: I am done, not interested in further heat up!