Pls uncles,(the CVs, writers, directors) CAN U EXPLAIN!!
Can somebody explain please, 'cos I am seriously getting frustrated out of my head. Sumitra and Loha are talking about the union of Madhur and Rekha. But Rekha and Ranvijay are not divorced yet. And there is no talk of divorce at all.
- So are Ranvijay and Rekha going to get divorced first, or not?
- Or are Madhur and Rekha just going to get married to each other without the divorce?
First Laali blew the sanctity of marriage to pieces with three marriages on her list and with all living spouses.
Then Shekhar with two marriages – two living spouses
Now it seems to be "married" Rekha with another proposed marriage on the cards but with no talk of divorce at all.
There seems to be something really rotten in the state of Bihar. Perhaps they don't understand the meaning of marriage at all.
Or are the CVs trying to tell us something, that really, there is no such thing as sanctity of marriage. A husband or wife can leave each other, go away with somebody else, get married to them without a divorce, and stay with them as husband and wife. When they get tired of each other, they can repeat the process all over again.
Because so far, this is what has been happening on the show.
So it is not Shekhar who has gone crazy but the AJ writers and directors. They should be the ones getting electric shocks, upgraded to the highest possible current. (Maybe then they can improve their story telling techniques – which sometimes seems so botched up with their inconsistencies, lack of details and, boy! mistakes galore …)
I understand this is a story … but such stupidity …