Blake Lively pushes for evidence in $400 Million lawsuit against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios

Blake Lively has recently challenged the $400 million loss claims made by Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios, demanding they provide proof of the alleged financial damages. The legal battle continues to intensify as Blake Lively's legal team seeks clarity on the claims that have been made against the actress.

According to reports, Blake's legal team has filed a formal request with a judge, urging that Justin Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, and other involved parties disclose their financial records. The request, sent last Friday, points to previous efforts made by Blake's team to obtain these documents, but they were met with limited cooperation.

The Another Simple Favor actress legal representatives met with Justin's counsel, requesting the necessary documents. However, Justin's team reportedly indicated they would only provide "non-privileged documents concerning their damages" and not the specific financial records Blake's team had asked for. This has led to Blake's team seeking a court order to compel the disclosure of full financial details.

The $400 million lawsuit against Blake, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times stems from accusations of sexual harassment and smear campaigning made by Lively against Baldoni. In response, Lively’s legal team argues that the figures cited in the lawsuit are vague and lack substantiation. They are now demanding that Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios provide concrete proof of their financial loss.

Additionally, Blake's attorneys pointed out that the film It Ends With Us, which was a major commercial success, casts doubt on the validity of the damage claims. The legal team asserts that despite this success, Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios are claiming significant losses without offering detailed evidence to support their allegations.

The lawsuit has garnered significant attention in Hollywood, raising questions about the financial consequences of accusations and the responsibilities of those involved in such legal disputes. This marks a critical moment in the ongoing legal battle that could have wider implications for similar cases in the industry.