Glorification of Abhinav - Page 4

Originally posted by: verve

I am ok with any sensible track, because there's very few serials I watch, but heard the writers from earlier seasons were replaced. Finally I don't mind a SM or some other clichéd tracks instead of watching FL declaring a stranger as father to her child and get married to a stranger for no reason. I could never understand the reason behind this non-sense.

I may be repeating some point here, but at the end of the day, they just need to show Abhinav as someone relatable. I am not saying good people don't exist, but people usually have some personality quirks ( not just money issues and the like ). I think they tried to show that Abhinav also gets angry in some cases, but it just feels unnatural for the character. It's also Ak always glorifying him, and pretty much everyone glorifies him. If a character is good, you don't need to keep saying that and keep talking about it.

When Abhi did stuff for Ak, nobody called him a good person. In that, it was just him loving her, and that is it. Even when he helped strangers or did stuff for his family that was extreme, no one said oh, he is AA. Every good deed that Abhi did was taken normally or was explained with his emotions. That is how it should be. Even every good deed Ak did was never glorified as AA. Abhi loved her cause she was kind and compassionate, but never was that glorified to this extent. They were seen as complex people with both good and bad. Even if they weren't a couple, they were still interesting by themselves. Abhinav is only AA, his whole identity is that, its the most boring 1D character I have seen on ITV.

Even other good guy parallel leads don't get so much glorification. Most of them are liked but not loved by the FL, and that is a common trope. But here, it is taken to an extreme and made almost comical.

Originally posted by: lagjagale

I may be repeating some point here, but at the end of the day, they just need to show Abhinav as someone relatable. I am not saying good people don't exist, but people usually have some personality quirks ( not just money issues and the like ). I think they tried to show that Abhinav also gets angry in some cases, but it just feels unnatural for the character. It's also Ak always glorifying him, and pretty much everyone glorifies him. If a character is good, you don't need to keep saying that and keep talking about it.

When Abhi did stuff for Ak, nobody called him a good person. In that, it was just him loving her, and that is it. Even when he helped strangers or did stuff for his family that was extreme, no one said oh, he is AA. Every good deed that Abhi did was taken normally or was explained with his emotions. That is how it should be. Even every good deed Ak did was never glorified as AA. Abhi loved her cause she was kind and compassionate, but never was that glorified to this extent. They were seen as complex people with both good and bad. Even if they weren't a couple, they were still interesting by themselves. Abhinav is only AA, his whole identity is that, its the most boring 1D character I have seen on ITV.

Even other good guy parallel leads don't get so much glorification. Most of them are liked but not loved by the FL, and that is a common trope. But here, it is taken to an extreme and made almost comical.

here just to bring a 3rd angle and and do cross pair ,the both leads core character changed ,they forgot what was shown preleap ,

First Abhinav is a ckt who really needs to be appreciate because good karma needs to be appreciate but if people r using this appreciation term as glorification than I can't change anyone POV. Let them think what they want.

Second Abhimanyu ckt didn't get destroyed for anyone on a white day but yes I have to say they r completely destroying his ckt now. He was always an ignorant & angry person. The current track should be Abhimanyu redemption but he is still behaving like victims.

Are we not used to good people on ITV? Is it just me who think Nav is completely normal or am I the only one who grew up around good men?

Originally posted by: Noorain13

Are we not used to good people on ITV? Is it just me who think Nav is completely normal or am I the only one who grew up around good men?

Even as surprised with the repeated use of the word glorification etc

but if something good is said about abhiM then it’s true to his character and it’s not glorification.

Originally posted by: Noorain13

Are we not used to good people on ITV? Is it just me who think Nav is completely normal or am I the only one who grew up around good men?

That's what my point is ITV don't have good ML. So while the production is introducing a character like this why not introduce him properly.

They should not show AbhiM type a guy as a lead getting girls. We still don't know the endgame so that's for later.

People are calling him words, trolling along with the leads so when it's upto us why not present him in a better way.

IMO- Abhinav is good but i don't find him normal. a) under the circumstances he met Akshara, how he made sure he is a AA(i am not saying it that's his dailogues- my issue why give this dialogue) in real life we would have found it creepy.

Could have introduced him as an acquaintance of priya(Ak friend) or just presentation would be better.

The guy calls Abhimanyu good man even after realising he is the one who abandoned his now wife yet got triggered when called ghatiya- normal circumstances mein pheli baat trigger krti hai

I am all about men like Abhinav over Abhimanyu any day and my post isn't AbhiM vs AbhiN

This is about the presentation of the characters pr say characteristics that are the need of the hour.

If i knew that people are pro AbhiM no matter what i will make him better coz people should not root for him ATM.

Also, in storyline would have been better to see other people's pov too which is lacking.

The story line sucks and that's why this character is not working properly coz presentation

See I have no issues with Abhinav and I like him being good and I want him TK remsin AA. But I honestly don’t want every track to be about him and every other episode about his parenting skills, his goodness, his poverty, his khuddari .. it is not about scree. Space .. it is about how every major point ends up becoming about him .. I was totally zapped when Abhir’s truth turned out to be about Abhinav’s conjugal rights .. I do have a problem with that .. but then in the beginning they used yo do that with Abhimanyu too .. except for the few times when Goenkas were rightfully angry with him .. I remember how much Mimi and Swarna praised him .. he was really promoted as the next best thing after sliced butter .. while a minority in the audience might have found him problematic , the story sbd most characters in it glorified him .. I did wonder how the other birla children would have felt about how much Abhi got away with every thing and how they all used yo use Abhimanyu as a benchmark .. but because they were leads or because at least some of us could find the greys in spite of glorification. , it didn’t feel as grating .. but writers have no balance I guess ..