All three of these relationships come under trauma bonding.
Originally posted by: lagjagale
Yeah, sometimes I definitely feel like we are watching two different shows. They did share everything. They woke up happy, shared in each other's joys and sorrows, everything. Just cause there were a LOT of tragedies doesn't mean they weren't happy together. Abhi's only issue with Ak, ever, was her helpful nature. And he loved her for that, too; he just felt neglected. Was he insensitive on many accounts, yes. Was she stubborn and stupid on many accounts, yes. But they were never unhappy together. They were only unhappy apart. Most importantly, they made each other want to be better. When Abhi's hand issue happened, Ak supported him soo much. He would have gone into a deep dark pit without her, and she kept him afloat. Abhi also supported Ak's career and her dreams so much. He gave her the confidence to pursue her dreams to the fullest. At the end of the day, if they had been separated from their family, they would have been happy together.
Ak- arohi relationship cannot be compared because it was based on childhood trauma and downright bullying of arohi. Similarly, while Manju-Abhi relationship is a closer approximation, it's still the bond between mother and son. It's also steeped in childhood trauma and bullying by Abhi's dad, by the way.
Finally, regarding your last comment, Ak-Abhi were in love, they chose each other, they got married, things happened and they separated. There is no comparison to Ak-Nav, they got together because of a deal, in which Ak laid out all the terms. She has not exploited Abhinav. He is free to leave the relationship whenever he wants.
Current Affairs
10