Daddaji is not always fair

Originally posted by: smittu

Daddaji does have double standards when it cums to gayatri's children and his own daughter. I remember very well on two occassions when he has made this obvious. remember, long before once , before Naksh wedding, Naitik was taken to the police station for some traffic offence stuff and Rajbanna and daddaji both had to go to the police station and then the inspector in the station sees daddaji in the station and gets up and greets daddji and says "acha yeh apka beta hain", then, daddji immeditely says " yeh hamara beta nahin hain" and points towards raj, which i thot was very mean. and also, during the Naskh wedding he refers to Akshara's parents to Gayatri as "tumhare samdhi walo ko bata do....."

he is giving Naitik all the importance in offc because, he doesnt have a son , if he had ,I doubt if Naitik would ever become this important in office. also, that day to Shankari tayi, he was very stern when saying that Nandini will get married first and then alone Rashmi.

Also, he never said anything to Nandini when he came to know of the Mohit-Nanadini saga, our Akshi was punished and tortured more than anyone else, while I donot really remember daadji saying anything strongly to Nandini. Would daddji have spared Rashmi this easily if she had declared her love like this ??????

My whole point is , daddaji does love Rashmi and Naitik, no two questions abt tht, but he def is not impartial. He loves his daughter way more than Rashmi or Naitik.

Originally posted by: smittu

Daddaji does have double standards when it cums to gayatri's children and his own daughter. I remember very well on two occassions when he has made this obvious. remember, long before once , before Naksh wedding, Naitik was taken to the police station for some traffic offence stuff and Rajbanna and daddaji both had to go to the police station and then the inspector in the station sees daddaji in the station and gets up and greets daddji and says "acha yeh apka beta hain", then, daddji immeditely says " yeh hamara beta nahin hain" and points towards raj, which i thot was very mean. and also, during the Naskh wedding he refers to Akshara's parents to Gayatri as "tumhare samdhi walo ko bata do....."

he is giving Naitik all the importance in offc because, he doesnt have a son , if he had ,I doubt if Naitik would ever become this important in office. also, that day to Shankari tayi, he was very stern when saying that Nandini will get married first and then alone Rashmi.

Also, he never said anything to Nandini when he came to know of the Mohit-Nanadini saga, our Akshi was punished and tortured more than anyone else, while I donot really remember daadji saying anything strongly to Nandini. Would daddji have spared Rashmi this easily if she had declared her love like this ??????

My whole point is , daddaji does love Rashmi and Naitik, no two questions abt tht, but he def is not impartial. He loves his daughter way more than Rashmi or Naitik.

Originally posted by: moonlight08

i agree to wat all u hav sed.. but only to an xtent...

during the police station incident.. daddaji was deeply hurt by munna's wrongdoings...

first of all.. our munna had rejected the proposal of joining the business.. which i think had hurt his conscience.. he had not xpected this from him.. n after dat.. munna landed in trouble.. which aggrevated him even more.. so.. it was actually his anger.. he did not actually mean wat he sed..

n if you had noticed.. daddaji himself had sed during the marriage.. when naitik was not offered a job.. he had sed ki nothing's bigger than munna's happiness.... n all... so.. he really cared..

n rahi baat abt addressing the maheshwari's as choti dulhan ke samdhi.. well.. i havnt noticed that... so may be ur rite.. m not sure...

n during the mohit-nandini issue... well.. a father's trust was broken in this case.. so.. the silence was actually equivalent to torture for nandini.. as.. it is very difficult for a daughter to break her father's trust n den look at him... n even nandini has suffered a lot.. her father did not talk to her.. n so did her mother.. she had lost trust in her parent's eyes.. n this is actually a lot for a daughter... more more than death.. i suppose..

n the case of akshara's torture.. well.. daddaji.. i dnt think was responsible for it,, yes.. he was responsible to an xtent... but.. eventually.. it was naitik who had hurt her.. he was the one hu had asked her to leave in the middle of the nite... n if we see the other way round.. daddaji in a way actually helped naksh unite..

for rashmi.. i think he has already spared her once.. when they went for holi.. n becoz of rashmi's ignoring wale plans.. naitik left the place in a hurry.. well.. daddaji did not say nethng to rashmi.. though it was a small thng.. but still.. he did not say nethng to her.. he first scolded bma n den gayitri...

n for rashmi marriage.. well.. the case is dual faced rite now..

if daddaji had agreed to the rishta.. n then rashmi wud have faced ne prbs.. then gayitri wud be lyk aapne meri beti ke liye sahi rishta nhi chuna..

n abhi mana kar dia hai.. to dre's prb....

n daddaji has given the justification so as to why he does not tok abt such things in front of bhabhi ma in the last episode..

so.. i thnk he's rite in doing watever he is..

no offenses..

this is just my point of view...

Originally posted by: manasi_31

Extremely well said.....!!👏

About the MohIni issue, I completely agree with you that it was Naitik who was responsible for Askahara leaving the house..I would not say that AKshara wasn't wrong..But about the house-leaving incident,Daddaji was infact unhappy with Naitik because Naitik had told her to leave the house in his anger....He toldNaitik to bring Akshara back..It was Naitik's attitude and ego that spoiled everything to the extent of misunderstandings existing for nearly two months!!

But then there is another point that Daddaji later told noone will go to bring back Akshara now..There he became egoistic himself because he did not like Vishambhar questioning his decisions.....So,if Gayatri is questioning his decision now,I wonder how he'll be reacting with her...If his heart mets towards Gayatri instead of him taking some strong action against her,we'll have to agree that Daddaji is very impartial and has a soft corner for Gayatri,also including Rajshekhar,Rashmi,Naitik and Akshara........

And yaa...you are right..Even if Daddaji would have accepted this rishta for Rashmi,still Gayatri would have complained,let be Rashmi's suffering.....

Just one thing I am still confused about...why isn't Daddaji telling the reason to everyone in the house?Yeterday's episode was still unsuccessful in clering that...Daddaji said something to Bhabhimaa..But this did not explain what he meant......He should have kept the true reason infront of the whole family instead of thinking that this isn't so important......The real reason behind Gayatri's overreaction IS Daddaji's reason-hiding about disapproving Rashmi's rishta.......