I wish...CVs would show Vishaka and Sameer Bonding - Page 2

Originally posted by: ...Khushboo...

Me too desperately waiting to see Sam-Vishakha bond and what u said I completely agree👍🏼

In yesterday episode I just love that mother-son scene I hope we get more in future too.

And lastly whenever Sam called vishakha as 'mummy' don't know why it's melt my heart everytime❤️

I love the way he calls her mummy...I want Vishaka to take complete responsibility , if he is caught in trouble...She should feel guilty that she couldn't live up to what her father had expected her to do for her own son.

Originally posted by: Anjali33

I agree Ashu Di

They need to show Vishakha n Sameer's bonding now..it's been enough of Vishakha n Rohan ka laad-pyaar!!

Now Sameer has promised that he'll mend his ways n try to stay calm n adjust with d family..n even Vishakha feats losing her son after his Ahmedabad stint!!

She needs to understand , that Sameer is a boy with loads of energy so should keep him occupied...where as Rohan from younger days is kind of quieter side of character...if not he would have rebelled early when timetable was set...so kids are different and a mom should know how to channelize their energy into right path...

Originally posted by: TereLiyeMINU

I completely support two people :CVs and YOU.

Coming to this post ..you are right on all points and thaat wish is legit too.

And coming to CVs..I am a bit disappointed with them for two things-Entry of 'faltu ka drama' and 'mis management in execution.'

Now that SamAina are not together, it is perfect time to show the growth of side characters.

Potential bondings like Visakha-Sam,Rohan-Sam-Deepika in Delhi

and Preeti-NaiNA-MunDit and Shefjun for SamAina..

This is the perfect too perfect time for SwaMun to roll.

Instead of wasting scenes on KeDi drama so much the time could be utilised to show these bonds keeping SamAina in center..

The CVs would not get a better phase and time to show the bonding because once SamAina are back then the side characters would fade away to bg..

Thank you Minu...I have been wondering why they brought in Dhadhi's character ...for me she looks like a Vamp out of Sas Bahu serial. I feel her character sketch doesn't gel with the rest of the characters in the show. And I am a lil disappointed with her dialogue delivery too.

I have no clue why they showed Sameer with all the mawali group of friends...where as his choice of friends at Ahmedadab were not the famous and rude ones...rather the ones who were down to earth and have their own set of principles in life. When a boy could respect woman and judge ppl easily , adapt at a new household just for getting a sorry from a girl...because he realized that he had sinned...how can they show him with no conscience now...suddenly how can ppl loose such moral values ...and cannot judge the new set of ppl...in fact these are boys who had initially taunted him while walking back home rt?? That time itself he knew they were not rt...I cant understand why they had to bring in this track...have been trying to find logic...cant reach anywhere close to it...

Sometimes I wonder is it to awaken Vishaka...that she failed as a mother because when Sameer was with his father it wasn't this bad. OR is it to bring Naina and then with her help he redeems ?? Whatever it is ...I feel they destroyed his character to show the growth of either Naina or Vishaka.

Originally posted by: -HJ-

Hello! Never interacted with you. Thank you for the post!

I agree with all the points mentioned. They should focus on Sameer-Vishakha's relationship right now. Somewhere I didn't completely blame Vishakha for keeping Sameer away. In those times, (even still today in few cases), remarriage was difficult for a woman. The way they are showing that only husband's previous marriage child (Rohan) and Somani-Vishakha's child (Deepika) is given importance. Women as always are not considered at all and that is why Sameer is facing this. Also, more than Somani, dadi is cunning and not letting anything from Vishakha's previous marriage get into her house. I completely understand why Sameer was in hostel and Nanu. However, I don't see any strong reason for Nanu making Vishakha remarry!

The way they have shown Nanu's character, he could have made Vishakha handle the business and Sameer if Somani was not ready to accept Sameer. Usually remarriages are for the reason that the child gets both the parents' love but I don't see it here then why would a person like Nanu agree for the marriage! This is very strange for me.

This is the right time to show all this things because Samaina are not around each other. Plus they can also reveal what happened to Naina's mother as well instead of unnecessary drama about those guys and showing stunts!

P.S sorry for being slightly off track from what you posted. I wanted to share my thoughts! Thanks again :)

Yes , I have always wondered why Vishaka had to marry Somani , when he didn't even try to win her sons heart...where as she was able to win Rohan s heart...and I agree with you ...I feel Nanu isn't a person who would have forced her to remarry ...I think there is more to Vishaka and her past ...same holds good with Niana's mom...not a single picture of her mom ...why ?? Only grandparents photo is framed hung on the wall...very weird.

There are so many loose ends...and I am not able to understand why they needed Dhahi and these mawali friends...I thought Sameer's character had redeemed with the apology track at Agarwal house ...not sure what they are trying to portray...why bring in so much of negativity ...to justify what ?? Is beyond my understanding!!

Originally posted by: angelic567

I agree... We need to see more of vishaka sam bonding.. We already started getting small scenes... Vishakha being distraught on not knowing sam's whereabouts eas beautifully shown... Vishakha was proud of sameer when he confessed about using the fees money for the flight tickets... Feeding him with her own hands and hugging was also another good progress in their relationship... Sam even had flashbacks of nanu feeding him while vishakha fed him... That means somewhere vishakha is getting successful in filling the void in sameer's life... Hoping to see more of mom son bonding.

Yes , I loved that scene...but I wanted that moment to be just theirs and not bring in Dhadhi...I wouldn't have had a problem Rohan seeing that , as he needs to understand his mom is actually Sameers mom ...the affection that Rohan got from Vishaka was snatched and taken from Sameer...so I didn't like Dhadhi seeing it...again the typical Sas Bahu serial touch comes in place ...now dhadhi would want to scheme and plot something to make Sameer look back...

On the other hand I wonder if the CVs are doing this so that they get the typical serial watching crowd to improve their TRP...but I doubt if that will work...as the TRP is reducing every week...So its imp to bring in character growth for many ..and get their USP ( Sameer - Naina) pair back on screen in the same frame romancing .

Very True! Delhi track has a lot of potential and if well executed could be one of the best tracks...

Originally posted by: Mayashika

Very True! Delhi track has a lot of potential and if well executed could be one of the best tracks...

I want Vishaka to pamper sameer and a proper conversation between them...Vishaka should know the pain and neglection Sameer felt and she should start showing atleast a little affection towards Sameer before Somanis..also improvement of relation between Vivek Somani and Sameer..I don't expect loving one but some kind of understanding like a truce or something..And the sibling bond too...I just love when Sameer and Dipika are shown..That scene where Sameer was irritating Rohan was funny...By seeing the sibling bonding, Vishaka may get a little bold too..I am so tired of Dadi tucking her hair!!!

True...that Dhadhi was not needed at all ..infact they could have shown how the siblings tried to adjust and slowly got used to each other ...seeing their interaction Somani would have mellowed down a lil...I still cant understand why they had to bring in a character like Dhadhi at the Delhi household...when conflict could have made even otherwise like how they did with the Agarwal family...making Tayiji and Rakesh a lot more orthodox in approach ...same way with Somani and disciplined approach and Rohan /Sameer/Deepika s insecurity around Vishaka ..could have been made the point of conflict ...Dhadhi and her Sas Bahu type of plotting and scheming is a complete waste...and now this mawali friends...hmmm...

When ever I watch a story ...I as a viewer should be able to understand the logic behind the appearance of a character...but here I am completely lost at the presence of Dhadhi and mawali friends...and the current Sameers behavior where in he is being a part of a mawali gang...as if he has lost his capacity to judge people...cant find any justification...wonder is it the same character who was at Agarwal house trying to get a sorry from Naina!!

Originally posted by: WeRockTheWorld

Yes , I have always wondered why Vishaka had to marry Somani , when he didn't even try to win her sons heart...where as she was able to win Rohan s heart...and I agree with you ...I feel Nanu isn't a person who would have forced her to remarry ...I think there is more to Vishaka and her past ...same holds good with Niana's mom...not a single picture of her mom ...why ?? Only grandparents photo is framed hung on the wall...very weird.

There are so many loose ends...and I am not able to understand why they needed Dhahi and these mawali friends...I thought Sameer's character had redeemed with the apology track at Agarwal house ...not sure what they are trying to portray...why bring in so much of negativity ...to justify what ?? Is beyond my understanding!!

Totally agree on why would Sameer again become like this. I mean when he entered PVKM, he was not a spoilt brat sort of person. He was mischievous and did not like to follow rules! But these qualities of roaming around with such people is beyond my understanding especially after the voice over of Sameer after the bet phase, it seemed that he has grown from what he was and obviously it's so illogical right now that he will roam with such rowdies! He was rich when he became friends with Mundit and so definitely Sameer's character isn't the one who behaves as usually rich kids behave! But let's see because there may be something to this!!

They better reveal Sameer and Naina's mother mystery!

Originally posted by: WeRockTheWorld

True...that Dhadhi was not needed at all ..infact they could have shown how the siblings tried to adjust and slowly got used to each other ...seeing their interaction Somani would have mellowed down a lil...I still cant understand why they had to bring in a character like Dhadhi at the Delhi household...when conflict could have made even otherwise like how they did with the Agarwal family...making Tayiji and Rakesh a lot more orthodox in approach ...same way with Somani and disciplined approach and Rohan /Sameer/Deepika s insecurity around Vishaka ..could have been made the point of conflict ...Dhadhi and her Sas Bahu type of plotting and scheming is a complete waste...and now this mawali friends...hmmm...

When ever I watch a story ...I as a viewer should be able to understand the logic behind the appearance of a character...but here I am completely lost at the presence of Dhadhi and mawali friends...and the current Sameers behavior where in he is being a part of a mawali gang...as if he has lost his capacity to judge people...cant find any justification...wonder is it the same character who was at Agarwal house trying to get a sorry from Naina!!

Just wanted to add something- in the first place I don't understand why they had to kill Nanu! If they can make changes with the original story, they could have changed this too. But forget that- as people say that this is because Sameer as a character had to grow so they showed this.

What I think that why dadi is here is because if they had to show Somani then definitely they would have to (they could have avoided the character of dadi but then they wanted negativity so nothing can be done)!