Rajma idli daily rantingz - Page 13

Originally posted by: myangels

Lol..
Mihika is in Bhallas house again..
It would be better, if CVs send Romi on business trip without creating the drama...

Originally posted by: momb24

Are they together as husband and wife?

They never get them to talk, they'll never speak about adi, so much unfinished things they need to sort out.

Wish the reflected on both their behaviour since adi died.

Originally posted by: abhilasha_dream

They have sent Romi on a business trip itself.

Romi had decided to stay with Bhallas itself and Raman sent him to Rome on a business project.

Okay...didn't watch yesterday's episode...
Thank you..

Originally posted by: myangels

IshRa never force her to accept the baby...
It was her only wanted the baby for herself for her revenge...
Aliya's characterisation was better before when she was angry...
But nowadays she is behaving like dumb, so no sympathy for her..
She should move on in her life leaving the baby as there will be no Roshini now...

Will be happy if Parth is selected for Anurag. But to me, EK terming the actors whose names are circulating by the media as "way past of their prime" is harsh and offensive. Her bestie Anita is nearing 40 but still doing lead role of mid/late twenties in Nagin 3, Surbhi is 31 and Tanna is 33. Isn't it ridiculous to term the actors as "way past their prime" when she casts all the actresses well above 30, even close to 40?! Her "24 year young love saga" tweet rant is nonsense because she doesn't follow what she preaches. In Kayamat Ki Raat, Raj and Gauri both are shown 24 but leads Tanna is 33 and VD is 33 as well.

Originally posted by: Manan_Pani_fan

Will be happy if Parth is selected for Anurag. But to me, EK terming the actors whose names are circulating by the media as "way past of their prime" is harsh and offensive. Her bestie Anita is nearing 40 but still doing lead role of mid/late twenties in Nagin 3, Surbhi is 31 and Tanna is 33. Isn't it ridiculous to term the actors as "way past their prime" when she casts all the actresses well above 30, even close to 40?! Her "24 year young love saga" tweet rant is nonsense because she doesn't follow what she preaches. In Kayamat Ki Raat, Raj and Gauri both are shown 24 but leads Tanna is 33 and VD is 33 as well.

daljeet playing teenage girl role qayamatt ki raat

Originally posted by: Manan_Pani_fan

Will be happy if Parth is selected for Anurag. But to me, EK terming the actors whose names are circulating by the media as "way past of their prime" is harsh and offensive. Her bestie Anita is nearing 40 but still doing lead role of mid/late twenties in Nagin 3, Surbhi is 31 and Tanna is 33. Isn't it ridiculous to term the actors as "way past their prime" when she casts all the actresses well above 30, even close to 40?! Her "24 year young love saga" tweet rant is nonsense because she doesn't follow what she preaches. In Kayamat Ki Raat, Raj and Gauri both are shown 24 but leads Tanna is 33 and VD is 33 as well.

Originally posted by: snehaseshan

True wen anita thanked ekta for casting her in naagin inspite of her age ekta commented that age is not a barrier and now she is calling actors at 30's as way past of their prime.. Waah heights of hypocrisy 😡

Ekta lost it in many different ways.