Where The Shoe Pinches - IshRa OS

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Aani

@EkPahelii

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#21

Originally posted by: imasha94
OMG Im speechless tooo
Well written
Beautiful os
Thank u soo much for this
If they showing it in the show
It could be a massege to the society
Anywayy
Story is speechless

thank you Asha 😊

Quote

Aani

@EkPahelii

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: GBSC
Yes . Wautifully written.
But none can have an excuse to take away another person's life.
I can never forgive ishu for that .
But what happens after that was very interesting .
It's necessary to move on.
Not to hold grudges over the past .
Nothing can be undone .
Ruhi did a wonderful job of making Raman realise that .
But personally speaking.
Ishu did not deserve to raise Vansh n imbibe her values in him.
She too is human n flawed.
Tit for tat is wrong .
Hence I accept this ending .
But it is necessary for a person to feel guilty for one's crime.
That's an important virtue .
Ishu needs to have it .
Three months is a short time for her to forget the past .
Ideally inspite of everything ishu should ask for space to forget n forgive herself for her sad past.
That would define her chr better.

I see where you are coming from, but I believe not all acts of taking a life are wrong, this is one of them as per me.

When a soldier fights for his/her country and kills an enemy to save the citizens of his/her nation - in essence he/she is committing the same act but because it isn't being done out of malice or any personal vendetta or isn't a paid hit, it is lauded heroic.

Similarly when terrorists commit the same act by their people they are lauded but in essence they have committed a crime against humanity itself because they killed hundreds or thousands of innocents who caused them no harm or ill for personal glorification.

The same act can have two sides...

Now I am no scholar, no pandit but I am a devout Hindu and a devotee of Krishna who is said to have narrated the book that has all the answers to life and in it Krishna himself has advocated 'it is a sin to commit injustice but it is a greater sin to tolerate injustice'.

Ishita didn't kill Adi because she was paid to do it, she had no grudges against him. Rather she still loves him but in that moment she chose to do what is right over her love for him.

Guilt IMO rises when one does something which they know they never should have and yet did. It is purposely doing the wrong thing while knowing that there is something else to do - an option to pick - doing what is right.

Here Ishita has already done something which was right - Adi in that frame of mind wasn't the ideal son she loved - he was not even a human being - he was just a person filled with rage and obsession and he needed to be stopped which is what Ishita did.

When in your heart you know that you have done what is right the question of guilt doesn't even arise. And when there is no guilt the question of forgiveness doesn't arise because this wasn't a crime. It was the need of the hour.

Again Ruhi here wasn't trying to make Raman realize he should move on - she was putting herself in Roshni's shoes and the mere enactment of it was enough to shake him up.

She put him in the shoes of the father of the victim here which is the point of the play.

Aparajita suffers the fate she does because she has no Ishita to help her out.

Ishita is flawed, I agree but personally speaking her flaws aren't half as bad as that of the Bhallas.

Her losing Vansh is no Karma, it is merely a legality and the thought process which still values blood and flesh over love. Something which we have been seeing over and over again happening in YHM.

This OS isn't about the act of killing Adi but overlooking the consequences that lead to it.