Why people hated and did not accept Ichha Version 2.0

Page

Next Last

lamboobabu

@lamboobabu

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

Despite all the efforts stored in the masala-less brains of CVs
like torturing ichha V 2.0 by her in-laws
getting shot and subsequent paralytic attack
subjected to inconvenience by devrani, including attempt to murder
still why there is no reaction from the stupid audience
or rather why they have dumped ichha V 2.0

I found the reasons
1. after watching a dumb, docile, always-forgiving mahan ichha V 1.0 for five full years
people expected V 2.0 to be different like
strong, protesting, fighting against injustice head on
in other words a progression of character
but instead they were dished out ichha V 2.0 with the same attributes like
dumb, docile, always-forgiving mahan ichha V 2.0

so ichha V 2.0 was kind of stale and repetitive...nothing new in the character

2. Yesterday ichha V 1.0 clearly disowned by giving lectures on crimes
committed by her bro by not accepting and wishing him to be well wherever he lives
that part I liked, because I want hardcore criminals not be forgiven and accepted back
but dear dumb, ichha V 1.0 why the same rule is not applied to your
wonderful criminal family in which every member
be it eka, beit mamaji, be it nirbhaya and your own loving hubby akash
is a hardcore criminal committing at least one murder
they why are you so forgiving of this wonderful family filled with hardcore criminals?

so no wonder people have dumped you and your loving criminal hubby like hot potato...

Quote

Frequent Posters

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: lamboobabu
Despite all the efforts stored in the masala-less brains of CVs
like torturing ichha V 2.0 by her in-laws
getting shot and subsequent paralytic attack
subjected to inconvenience by devrani, including attempt to murder
still why there is no reaction from the stupid audience
or rather why they have dumped ichha V 2.0

I found the reasons
1. after watching a dumb, docile, always-forgiving mahan ichha V 1.0 for five full years
people expected V 2.0 to be different like
strong, protesting, fighting against injustice head on
in other words a progression of character
but instead they were dished out ichha V 2.0 with the same attributes like
dumb, docile, always-forgiving mahan ichha V 2.0

so ichha V 2.0 was kind of stale and repetitive...nothing new in the character

i agree wid each of ur word.and yes iccha always 4gave every1 but i think she also didn't 4give criminals except taps 4 whom she'd extra luv.rembr sanchi-satya.

they tried 2 make her iccha which is failed bcoz of her association wid aksh & his criminal family.atleast iccha's in-laws were not hard-core criminals who did murders. kidnappings & psychotic acts.

if they'd showed meethi as clear hearted but a strong who moved on wid vishnu & also supported him in moving on the story & TRPs wud'd been decent even if not chhappadphad.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: lamboobabu
Despite all the efforts stored in the masala-less brains of CVs
like torturing ichha V 2.0 by her in-laws
getting shot and subsequent paralytic attack
subjected to inconvenience by devrani, including attempt to murder
still why there is no reaction from the stupid audience
or rather why they have dumped ichha V 2.0

I found the reasons

2. Yesterday ichha V 1.0 clearly disowned by giving lectures on crimes
committed by her bro by not accepting and wishing him to be well wherever he lives
that part I liked, because I want hardcore criminals not be forgiven and accepted back
but dear dumb, ichha V 1.0 why the same rule is not applied to your
wonderful criminal family in which every member
be it eka, beit mamaji, be it nirbhaya and your own loving hubby akash
is a hardcore criminal committing at least one murder
they why are you so forgiving of this wonderful family filled with hardcore criminals?

so no wonder people have dumped you and your loving criminal hubby like hot potato...

again i agree wid u.she didn't accepted him. she mite'd 4given him but not accepted him.and even i liked that.

@bold thats my quesn also. why is she not applying this rule 2 her in-laws & hubby??here all except skrnt r criminals ekadsh, mamaji,both sis, nirbhay,surabhi,aksh,ambi etc.

thatswhy ppl've dumped her & her criminal luving hubby who has bcum luv angel thru 1-line of anoder hard core criminal & 23 days nautunki.

Quote

lamboobabu

@lamboobabu

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

even if not vishnu
and even if she wanted vishnu to marry mukku-nukku
for sake of love
I don't find any justification of her going back to
that criminal, her tormentor and the person
who loved to his heart's content the death of ichha and
the entire family danced on her chautha...

this I think, people have not forgotten
they could have shown another person, if not vishnu
and fight that criminal family by
sending them to their right place (tihar/arthur road jail)
people would have loved it...

by the way I am watching a promo
anandi fighting the rights of some girl called sanchi
who seemed to be tortured by someone...
but our protagonist loves her tormentor

and the writing is on the walll
BV is on top 10, kuttaran is out of top 30
even after this people think that viewers have forgiven akash
then good luck to such knowledge and intel...

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: lamboobabu
even if not vishnu
and even if she wanted vishnu to marry mukku-nukku
for sake of love
I don't find any justification of her going back to
that criminal, her tormentor and the person
who loved to his heart's content the death of ichha and
the entire family danced on her chautha...
lambooji tho i agree she shudn't'd gone back 2 aksh even she wanted 2 release vishnu 4mukta but ppl didn't like this bcoz he himself never wanted 2 go back.i think viewers not just find any logic in he rgoing back nor vishnu's going back.
this I think, people have not forgotten
they could have shown another person, if not vishnu
and fight that criminal family by
sending them to their right place (tihar/arthur road jail)
people would have loved it...
i agree but i still think vishnu wud'd been rite prsn as he respected/s iccha & was/is always against criminls tho its difft matter CVs now made him a fool by accepting mkta & aksh likesocial & legal criminals.
and ppl really wud'd luved sending of that family 2 jail.
by the way I am watching a promo
anandi fighting the rights of some girl called sanchi
who seemed to be tortured by someone...
but our protagonist loves her tormentor
yeah shes fighting 4 her nanand sanchi whos got date raped.tho sanchi is herself a big criminal(social) as she till raped was evil, obnoxious & cheap & never cared 4 any1else except her.but yes there even shes standing against her tormentor.
and the writing is on the walll
BV is on top 10, kuttaran is out of top 30
even after this people think that viewers have forgiven akash
then good luck to such knowledge and intel...

yeah thatswhy its in top 10. but after watching ystrdays epi i felt UT CVs've taken over BV.sanchi madam was saying 2 her tormentor u accept ur crimes in front of my family & get spared from legal punishment & my family will believe me tho her family is trusting her. they'd always trusted her & she always gave "dhoka" 2all including her family.

@bold and yes ppl'vn't 4given nor 4gotten aksh's criminal activities & not getting punishment& upar se mkta's psychotic acts also not 4gotten except few virtual viewers.

Edited by tiny15 - 11 years ago

Quote

Doremon_Selfie

@Doremon_Selfie

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

Agree
ut ke baad ab madhubala ki baari h
off air hone ki

Quote

lamboobabu

@lamboobabu

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

no, the way meethi, the dumbo queen
kept vishnu pushing out of the marriage
even though it is she who insisted to marry on whatever pretext
I don't find any reason for that marriage to continue...
because there is not the slightest intention of ichha V 2.0 to continue the marriage
so it becomes forceful and redundant...
if vishnu chose to move on with mukta
that is fine for him
(even personally I would have liked he should have dumped both and go away to his social service)
but the dumbo queen choosing that criminal
is simply unacceptable...

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: lamboobabu
no, the way meethi, the dumbo queen
kept vishnu pushing out of the marriage
even though it is she who insisted to marry on whatever pretext
I don't find any reason for that marriage to continue...
because there is not the slightest intention of ichha V 2.0 to continue the marriage
so it becomes forceful and redundant...
if vishnu chose to move on with mukta
that is fine for him
(even personally I would have liked he should have dumped both and go away to his social service)
but the dumbo queen choosing that criminal
is simply unacceptable...

i agree wid each of ur word except bold one.bcoz u urself replied in nxt line.

i agree dumbo queen choosing that criminal is no doubt unacceptable so is vishnu choosing mentally unstable woman after seeing her psychotic acts is also unacceptable.

so even if meethi-vishnu wudnt wanted 2 b 2gether i still wanted/s both 2 not 2 get back 2 either criminal or mentally unstable prsn.

me 2 wanted & still wants him 2 dump & leave that mentally unstable woman so that she shud also cum 2 her senses that wat she wants can't get always & that 2 by employing psychotic tactics.

she behaved typically like taps & i think she only wants him & still want 2 retain 4 her ego & showing him as her trophy. rembr her words "vihsnu jaisi daulat".it was not said due 2 sum luv but i find it 2 egoistic statement.its anoder matter RG is showing sumthingelse & thatswhy real viewers've dumped not just show but also both the jodis.

Edited by tiny15 - 11 years ago