This shows what a true mother is like - Page 2

Originally posted by: tiny15

wow!! wat a logic that poisoning leads 2 breaking of bond btn mother & an infant or toddler!!👏👏👏wonderful!! we r really enlightened by such great thinking & ideas!!!!😆

no mother how much poisoned against her infant or toddler will ever not feel that motherly bond even if doesn't know abt the kid as her own.

and taps'd held her baby & even bf her after her birth unlike icchha who was separated from her son just after his birth & hadn't held him even for 5 min. its only at taps place that she held him!! again wat an enlightened logic & rational!!wonderful!!😆

And she felt that connection after she held her child! Toh naturally as the mother she would have felt that bond naa? But did Tapu ever get to hold Muktha after she came to Ichha? We cant say she didnt feel something towards Muktha even before that im sure you remember when Tapu heard Muktha cry she said "meri bachchi" and ran down in a big hurry to find Ichha standing there and then even held out her hands to hold Muktha but by that time Nani came. Where is there any new logic in that?😆 You guys must be so much in the habit of making digs at me that you automatically start now before even carefully reading my posts😆 Do read my answers carefully before posting sarcastic replies😆 Do you expect by some chamatkaar a mother will see her baby and just automatically feel its hers?😆 In turn...what a wonderful logic mam😆😆😆👏

Originally posted by: kikyo

good post dolly ...even if tapasya didn't get a chance to hold mukhta .she should have wanted to meet mukhta again and again even if she didn't get a chance to hold her when ichcha came to meet her after all she is mukhta's mother but no because i think nani has locked her in the room that she cannot go out 😆

Tapu is not one to barge into other people's houses even BEDROOMS to hold their children on the sly😆 When she couldnt hold her child was she just supposed to feel an attachment to it from looking at it? baap re! what a logic😆

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

Tapu is not one to barge into other people's houses even BEDROOMS to hold their children on the sly😆 When she couldnt hold her child was she just supposed to feel an attachment to it from looking at it? baap re! what a logic😆

look who is taking about logic worth laughing 😆😆😆and ooh only holding children can get mothers attached to the baby new fresh logic worth laughing 😆...and indeed tapasya cannot barge into others houses and hold their babies but indeed go to others houses and invite them to her baby's naamkaran when she knew very well their baby is dead ..and according to you she was looking longingly towards mukhta when ichcha brought her to r's house and if she was feeling something for her then why not she wanted to meet her again ..she felt something even after seeing her that feeling should still be there ..who say barge into ichcha's house go respectfully to meet her and there see mukhta too after all given brith to her , breast fed her , holded her so many times 😆😆but no won't do it why? because she couldn't hold her when ichcha brought he...r is a small baby naa nani jo kahe gi natin wohi karegi 🤣

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

Tapu is not one to barge into other people's houses even BEDROOMS to hold their children on the sly😆 When she couldnt hold her child was she just supposed to feel an attachment to it from looking at it? baap re! what a logic😆

yeah taps never barge in2 oder's bedrooms but she go their like its her rite & sit on the bed & caressing bedsheets & even go in the dead of nite & making excuses of dreaming her child's death just 2 hold sum1else's husband!!😆😆😆

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

And she felt that connection after she held her child! Toh naturally as the mother she would have felt that bond naa? But did Tapu ever get to hold Muktha after she came to Ichha? We cant say she didnt feel something towards Muktha even before that im sure you remember when Tapu heard Muktha cry she said "meri bachchi" and ran down in a big hurry to find Ichha standing there and then even held out her hands to hold Muktha but by that time Nani came. Where is there any new logic in that?😆 You guys must be so much in the habit of making digs at me that you automatically start now before even carefully reading my posts😆 Do read my answers carefully before posting sarcastic replies😆 Do you expect by some chamatkaar a mother will see her baby and just automatically feel its hers?😆 In turn...what a wonderful logic mam😆😆😆👏

wonderful logic. and i expected this from u!!😆😆but actually we r not normal ppl naa so can't understand ur high std logics!!and even after running 2 that kid she just stopped bcoz of naani. why did she stop?? just bcoz naani'd told her shes picked from streets/roads!!wonderful i must say only u can understand ur baby & her "gud" intentions which r hidden behind her so obvious"bad" intentions!!!😆😆😆 @bold 1 we don't need 2 read ur biased & so full of "logics" reply bcoz after reading 1st 2-3 lines whole content & meaning gets cleared & even sumhow i like u said read ur replies i m time & again prove right of not reading ur posts as it contains repeatdely the same content & meaning!!

Originally posted by: muktha_cute

jab muktha ko yeh pata chelega that how iccha robbed her
tab toh iccha kali haath rehjayegi
coz neither yuvraaj can accept a women like iccha who is characterless as her mother
nor muktha can accept iccha a babyrobber who robbed her 4m her mother
kanha bhi toh muktha ke saath chela jayega

beechari iccha roti rehi jayega ya phir koi aur bache ke liye dundegi breast feedkarne ke liye shayad aaj kal veer vus se durr rehraha hoga

Originally posted by: varun.tap

@bold🤣 🤣🤣🤣🤣and

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

par mujhe lagta hai ki taps ki kartuten jaanane ke baad naa sirf yuvraj balki mukts bhi usse chhod degi aur phir taps ko hi rona padega!!

"Ichcha did not rob any child" She gave life to Mukta who was stranded on street on a rainy day! That is called "Mamta" an act does by a person who have human heart.

Please don't put to Shame on those wonderful feelings that still exist in Society due to u your blind craziness of one actor or actress.

What Ichcha did was also not right (to do a sneaky feeding) but she did not barge in to the Taps bedroom with a intention to steal her husband or to peep through like Taps did in B zoo.

Unboubtly Ichcha's intentions and feelings are good and clear than so called Vamp Taps's. Our disappointment is why can't the CV portray Ichcha as brighter and confident lady than showing as dumb and scared always.

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

Tapu is not one to barge into other people's houses even BEDROOMS to hold their children on the sly😆 When she couldnt hold her child was she just supposed to feel an attachment to it from looking at it? baap re! what a logic😆

Thats a gud point. Now tapasya dnt remember that she lost her child due to her foolishness. She is so busy with yuvraj tha she forgot her own child. Infact she is so busy with shopping that she dnt have time to think abt yuvraj so better to forget abt mukta. To feel anything abt child like ichha first she need to develope feelings 4 child and that is possible only if she sacrifice shopping 4 sometime. She knows only 1 thing that to blame ichha with old dialog bachpan se leke aj tak. Yuvraj aur mukta ka bachpan a gaya lekin iska bachpan khatam nhi hua.
I even agree with some members that ichha should give more attention to mukta and kanha who r completly dependent on her. For yuvraj she is ignoring both kids.