SHUBHCHINTAK 20.2
INNER VOICES 21.2
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: S8 - M41: New Zealand vs Pakistan🏏
•• Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2 ~ Chat Club #2 ••
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 M40: AUS vs OMA at Pallekele🏏
Sbs segment : double dhamaka- spoiler!
O Romeo emerges a FLOP
Kriti Sanon Rashmika As Lesbian Couple In Cocktail 2
Shahid Kapoor Questions Credibility of Critics
A TuHir FF: Never Your Wife Again!! Ch-1 pg 1
Gift of Giving: A Creative Writing Contest: WINNER ANNOUNCEMENT
Kalyug ka Parshuram ~ Shivprasad Deshmukh || Neil Bhatt AT
Geeze i think Meyer's should feel fortunate enough that a writer like King even bothered to give her a second look...and as for what he said, I personally dont really think he meant to be rude or mean, he just stated a matter of his opinion..(why he would even bother is what boggles my mind.) what really did tick me off though was how he said that James Patterson wasnt a good writer either...what the heck !!!! what is wrong with the way Patterson writes????
Originally posted by: aambika567
Thank you Stephen King, for telling it like it is. Yes (I am a very biased Harry Potter fan), but I hate how people like to defend Meyer's horrible writing (especially the usage of big words like she made it a point to use the thesaurus as many times as possible).