Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 13th Sep 2025 - WKV
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Pak vs Oman 4th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 13, 2025 EDT
PARAYI AURAT 13.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025 Ban vs Sri Lanka, 5th Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi🏏
Tanya was fab today👏🏻
Two contradictory dialgues in single episode? Aurton se Rude nai hona?
Anupamaa 13 - 14 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Who is this actor?
Katrina won't announce her pregnancy, is she?
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, 14th September '25 EDT.
KIARA THROWN 14.9
Prayansh Aransh Anpi FF: Swapnakoodu
Bb top 5 - guess
When a lie is repeated hundred times…
Cocktail 2 begins shooting with Shahid ,Kriti and Rashmika!
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025 India vs Pakistan, 6th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
Originally posted by: Bollyfan44
He is attracted to the girl, but apparently not her beliefs. He is trying to change these things about; he expects her to just adapt to a life, rules, beliefs, a man she did not choose. I think I would have ran after the onion. I get in certain religions it is bad to eat certain foods, but where is the choice. She was not raised with those rules or beliefs, nor did her family choose him as a groom.
QUOTE=Deebz]I am feeling like being a bit controversial today. All this talk of dharm from Uma seems very hollow against the actions he has taken. Marrying a wonan against her will is the biggest one of all. How can he justify that in terms of dharm. He acknowledges that he was wrong but is not doing any prayaschith other than giving Kanak some time before taking the next step. They have punishments for minor offences and this is criminal from dharmic and legal points of view! What should be his punishment for that? Athough I don't approve of Kanak's back handed ways, I cannot fault her for shunning the man. He has not shown any true remorse! And another perverse thought also strikes me. If with all the Shivji sankets, had Kanak turned out to be unattractive, would he have taken them as such? He married her because he was attracted to her and used Shivji to his advantage just as he was accusing Kanak of using dharm when it suited her!!In the same token- Bhabho's hatred for Kanak which has now put Kanak in this situation, I wonder if Suraj and Sandhya had died saving Ved or Vansh instead, how would she have behaved? Would she have applauded them for saving the kul deepak versus demonizing the paraya dhan like their daughter? I would think she would have showered double the love on the sons to safeguard the parents legacy!Please do share your thoughts. Thanks in advance.
Originally posted by: avifan123
hi ...am a silent follower of this discussion group...since u raised palomi's issue i want to add my two pence worth...do tell me is it just me or others are also sensing this...i find more chemistry in the uma-palomi pair rather than kanak-uma ...she is childish...no matter how many times kanak falls into uma's arms i dont find it sensual...whereas palomi's earlier devotion was more scintillating,,,, i think it is her height and sensual face,,,,, again i am talking of earlier episodes...before her character started stalking uma...now they are making her look like vamp...if they had explored uma-palomi relationship sparks wud have flown...i find it missing in kanak-uma pair...
😊do give me a reply pleez