[quote]So wat if scholars dont agree? How does it matter? GOD agrees! Actually you know, those scholars who dont agree na, they arent scholars, they are foolish.
Garg Samhita and all Purans arent written by HUMANS OKAY? I spit at those scholars who disagree.
Rishi-Munis of old times werent humans okay? They were those who themselves saw GOD, met them etc. and then wrote all Purans, Vedas, Shastras...SCHOLARS? HAH!!! They arent GOD!! They are todays stupid humans beings in my view if they tell this is wrong. One DOES NOT deny wat has been accepted by GOD!
Do you know who Garga Aacharya ji was? Who wrote Garg Samhita! Mr. Akhl, he was the one who defined Thakur jis destiny, did his namkaran etc. and you are telling human scholars dont agree with HIM? Thats JOKES. And they are a mock at themselves.
Who was Vedji? He was a rishi! You think hes dead? Aree, hes ONE among those 7 who are still alive since Satyug and will remain till Kalyug ends. One will deny his Purans? His Shastra? His scriptures? Then I will say these scholars are I****s.[/quote]
You have made up your mind to call all those who disagree with you as foolish, l****s, and fit to be spitted at. Then there is no point in giving any further arguments because you will outright reject it. I have been repeatedly saying that what you have been writing is one interpretation. But there are other interpretations also. It is a different matter that you do not agree with those. If you can quote from scriptures to support your point of view, then others also can quote from scriptures to support their points of view. You are glorifying rishis and saying that they cannot be wrong. But the same rishis have also written things, which are contradictory to what you have been writing. Of course, it is highly likely that there have been some later day interpolations. But how to decide what is interpolation and what is original? What you are doing is that you are only considering those portions of scriptures, which support your point of view and conveniently ignoring the rest.
You have written many other things, which are not relevant to our discussion. You wrote about 4 yugas and all. I already knew this and never denied, then what was the point of you telling that to me? I can easily reply to other things you have written. But what is the point? You will simply say that anybody who does nota agree with you is foolish, l****s and you spit at them even if I quote from scriptures. For example, it is a fact that Shiva Purana calls Shiva greater than Krishna but you will ignore it.
comment:
p_commentcount