Created

Last reply

Replies

66

Views

2994

Users

40

Likes

149

Frequent Posters

SDMAN thumbnail
Anniversary 3 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 2 months ago

Both are good ,Ranbir is more natural and Hrithik is very hardworking.but both of them are better than 3 khans .

Shaitan-Haiwan thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 months ago

Originally posted by: Katyayani786

Nobody can beat Ranbir in his man child game. After repeat rinsing the same expressions in each and every movie with a similar kind of character scope, he now excels in it. 


But put Ranbir out of that character, he will choke like a fish out of water like in Tu fati mein tatti and Brahmastra. 

Is it really “talent” if he’s just playing himself smiley42

Nishita123 thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 months ago

By miles smiley20

Katyayani786 thumbnail
Group Promotion 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Is it really “talent” if he’s just playing himself smiley42

His PR wants you to believe so.smiley36

Edited by Katyayani786 - 2 months ago
snatch thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago

hrithik is being typecast these days. both are equally good actors

Chasa thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago

Ranbir is way better 

Unicorn20 thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 2 months ago

Hrithik is more hard working and experimental in terms of acting but Ranbir is an effortlessly brilliant actor. Now you decide smiley36

_symphony thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 2 months ago

What is a good actor? Someone who always does best in same kind of roles or someone who experiments and is phenomenal in some while mediocre in some. Ranbir excels in first and Hrithik in second. I am yet to see Ranbir in any different kind of role that his contemporaries have done. Like a period film character like what a Shahid, Hrithik or Ranveer have done. Or a RAW agent/soldier/policeman. Ranbir too like Ayushmann sticks to one type of films while Hrithik is more similar to the likes of Ranveer who want to do different things. 

Edited by _symphony - 2 months ago
RaniPreityAish thumbnail
Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 months ago

People are hating on Hrithik in this thread because of his physical beauty (which drunken Animal definitely does not have nor has he ever had it).


Hrithik is getting the treatment that beautiful actresses get, when people ignore their talent because they dismiss them as mere beauties with no appeal beyond their looks. For Hrithik, it's a two-hit punch between his looks and dancing so he's now being relegated to a bad actor whereas Kapoor son has made a career out of playing himself exactly the same in every role, a problematic and misogynistic manchild. Animal is just the same role but amped up on steroids to be even more toxic and overtly violent.

nutmeg7 thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago

Yes. For me, Ranbir is a better actor than Hrithik