Originally posted by: mango.falooda
I hope my net connection stays while I type this.
so agree with points 1 and 2. in regards to point 3, it is debatable. do you remember the movie "kabhi kushi kabhi gham"? in the final scene, you find out that amitabh bachan's father character was waiting all those years for SKR's son character to come home and apologize. I remember when I first watched it, my reaction was: "whaaaaaaattttt?????" π€¦ββοΈ
but now, after having ring side view to real life parent-child conflicts, I would say that the movie is actually spot on. there are many parents out there who want the child to apologize first. there is a mountain of hurt and they feel humiliated and not valued and respected if they make the first move. lot of it is cultural and how we have a heirachy and rituals on how we observe respect and effort. so even with apology, we expect that kind of respect and ritual to be observed. on the other side, the children are like "we made enough effort." so how much effort is the right effort to resolve a conflict then becomes debatable.
also even if effort is made, it can sometimes be seen as insincere or not enough effort. let me share a real life example of family conflict in action:
party A (to bystanders): we sent a whatsapp message to invite them to function but they didn't even acknowledge
party B (to bystanders): is whatsapp the way to invite?!
party A (to bystanders): well, they won't even pick up our calls. so how exactly are we supposed to invite?
party B (to bystanders): shouldn't invitations be done face to face?
party A (to bystanders): well, if you don't even acknowledge whatsapp, don't pick up phone, how do we know that you won't slam the door in our face?
this sounds like a comedy of errors isn't it? while that is being passed around in the family gossip chain, us bystanders watching this ping pong battle are also having varied reactions:
bystander 1: this is dumb. are we arguing over whether whatsapp message is good effort?
bystander 2: whatsapp message is not good effort at all. obviously
bystander 3: they invited you and you don't have the decency to accept?
bystander 4: shouldn't someone make the first move to thaw? why are we grading effort here?
bystander 5: a good event is a time to put aside pettiness. what kind of dumb reason is this to keep fighting?
my point is that when it comes to effort or whether someone made enough effort can always be questioned. did katha make enough effort? we don't really know or if we do, it will still be debatable and perceptions may vary.
in mili's thread, shalzie asked a great question -- why did it take so long for mamaG to want to see aarav? why didn't she make effort earlier? my guess is that perhaps mamaG agreed with papaG and felt the bridges were broken and cannot be mended. however, with aarav's illness, she had a change of heart and all of a sudden a life and death situation made her dismiss all those old hurts as pointless.
The point that I want to put across is that Garewals are not Katha's problem. They have issues with Adi and not Katha. If Katha and Adi were just friends and not lovers, they would have no problem. Kailash doesn't think that Katha is bad, he thinks that Katha isn't good enough for his son. There's a difference. Kailash is angry on Adi because he dared to disagree. And Kailash is projecting that anger on Katha, because she spoilt his son and made him to disagree. Katha can't pacify Kailash because he isn't actually angry on her. No matter what she does, it won't be enough. A lame example, if you are a vegetarian, and you are being served non veg food. Will that satisfy your hunger? No right. Not because the food served isn't filling, it's because you can't eat it, no matter how much food is there.
Poor Adi made efforts till his last breath. I hope they show more of him before progressing to Viaan and Katha romance.
comment:
p_commentcount