Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly
I went through his recent tweets. I felt he was biased for two reasons. He doesn’t like FG and already said in one tweet he hoped LSC is not as bad. Yea he’s entitled to his opinion but seemed unnecessary to announce that in advance. And in another tweet he retweeted a positive review and said it was wildly off base. Seems like a weird thing to do dragging another review down just because you disagree with it. Actually it’s rather unprofessional when you are a reviewer/critic yourself
the second yes I agree, he shouldnt have
but first no, when I watch a remake definetly I will tell my opinion about the original, in fact it is honest because now we can say that he didnt like fg itself so it is taste maybe, infact it is more damaging to say I loved FG and didnt like this
when somebody watches a remake/adaption whether critic or audience we will state our opinion about the original, any movie will face this, performance, making everything will be compared
wasnt don remake compared to the original, drishyam's several versions, now vikram and veda will be compared and hrithik will be compared to vijay setupathi by both critics and audience, that is the risk you take when you remake
on a different note, i was listening to aamir interview with baradwaj rangan, the usual south success question, he said hindi audience are now very aware and open which he always complained about the lack of earlier. my sense is he also didnt realise that ppl know so much about FG, this movie (success or failure doesnt matter) he wouldnt have spent time on if he knew it, just my guess as he is very perceptive
Edited by vcs17 - 1 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount