It is true that Vikrant is a handsome master charmer but in his characterization, there have been several red flags which an intelligent, self reliant woman would have caught on, would have noticed. Unfortunately, Deepika did not. Very likely, she herself is a product of a very traditional, patriarchal upbringing and in a lot of ways, has had guilt about abandoning her man and her parents. She hasnāt fully evolved into a truly emancipated woman herself. Almost all of us in the audience were able to notice Vikrantās manipulations and Deepika did not? Surprising. She hasnāt outgrown her own conditioning and guilt. And is enjoying her domesticity, and pandering to a very obviously manipulative abusive partner. Probably, in her mind, the only wrong she is doing is being attracted to a married man. Beyond that, she does not see his subtle control, his regressive machinations. For me, Deepika has turned out a very mediocre, very run of the mill character. Sia, Abhay, Wasim, and Piroz are so much more interesting, with multiple dimensions! Sia has faced a break up and is handling it without destroying herself. Deepika, in a lot of ways, has remained where she was 10 years ago. Very easily, with barely any effort, her resolve broke down and she compromised her professional and personal ethics. How do you explain that? A lesser woman, with not as much education and independence, could have been manipulated so easily. You do not expect that that of a woman of Deepikaās stature! That continues to be a problem for me. There are many flaws in her own character that made her an easy prey to a man like Vijrant. And I do wish they had shown a truly evolved woman, who rose to where she is on her own, not a wimpy Deepika, throwing flirtatious longing glances at Vikrant.
comment:
p_commentcount