Bad! What proof do they have for their claim that whatever was between virat and pakhi in the past really is in the past for pakhi and that she has moved on? "Pakhi has stayed here for 1 year in your absence on our saying" does not count, because what proof do they have she wasn't sticking in the house just to be around virat, especially considering how much pakhi has been interfering in every aspect of sairat relationship in samrat's absence, including voicing against sairat every plans that include them two going out somewhere together.
I so wish that ashwini in front of everyone, including samrat, says to bhavani that if pakhi had moved on from virat and really was only staying here for samrat or family elders then why was she constantly interfering in sai and virat relationship including having such an issue with them both celebrating their own anniversary?
If pakhi really has no such feelings or intentions towards virat then why was she constantly showing objection to anytime virat and sai go out together and taunting them? Why was she constantly trying to usurp rights over virat like kicking sai out of hospital and not letting sai take care of virat? Why was she constantly trying to instigate virat against sai? The obvious is jealousy. It's so wrong that the family elders try and brush aside the obvious and try and push pakhi on samrat when she is eyeing up his brother.
These are things most of the elders know and have seen yet not one of even sai's supporters like ashwini or shivani will seem to call out pakhi openly on in front of pakhi's blind lying lawyers or in front of samrat upon whom pakhi is unfairly being forced upon. In fact now even sai's supporters are joining the effort to force pakhi on samrat with the intention of keeping her away from sairat relationship when that's stupid given they should know very well that pakhi not being in the house at all is best for sairat relationship.
Edited by sammy17 - 2 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount