The belief that a man can't say no to a woman because she's offering sex as if it's a rarity in the entertainment world is what's warped. There was a cast and crew of hundreds - not to mention countless civilians of which I'm sure more than a few aside from Kangana were willing to stroke his ego and other parts. He didn't have to settle for drunk and creepy. if he wanted sex with her he would have opened the door instead of calling hotel management and her sister to take her away.
She never alleged it was a one night stand or even a short affair so why do people keep trying to argue that for her? REGARDLESS it's not a he said/she said issue. There was EVIDENCE that they did not have an affair or even a one night stand. Evidence from her OWN disturbing e-mails in her own words. According to her e-mails they never kissed, he never saw her nude (so she sent him nude photos), they never had sex - but she was waiting. (shudder) She's still waiting and still obsessed.
Again, he filed police reports, he turned over all his electronics while she claimed hers fell in the pool or were sent to the shop the day the Cyber Police arrived. She made up lies about an easily disproven Paris engagement and a seven year affair of which she had not one single item of proof. All she provided was a photo shopped pic from a cast party with his wife. Instead she was in multiple relationships and affairs during that period - including alleged by her a 2 year affair with Ajay where she wanted him to leave Kajol. π
40 maybe, maybe not. As of 2009 there were the Zee reports about her passport having her at born 1981 when she was celebrating her 22nd birthday instead of her 28th. One of her producers joked it was no big deal as no new actress was ever more than 21-22. π€£ She doesn't look much younger than that but sure as I said in the first post she could just have turned 38 which is the age the police reports filed by her own sister in 2019 would have her at.
This is just conjecture on your part. If there was evidence, why couldn't he make his complaint/ case against her stick? After all, he does have a lot more influence in Mumbai with the authorities than she does. How come he couldn't get her to even apologize publicly as he had wanted? Point is that you have one interpretation of whatever evidence there might be, while the authorities clearly have another view of it- at least a view that didn't lead to them prosecuting her. I am not saying anything happened, just that it would be wrong to call her out for something that we don't know for sure.
as for what the producer said, these miserable characters are known by the cheapness of the remarks they make. Don't take what they say to the bank. π
comment:
p_commentcount