Yes, I know it's a big deal he chose her as his muse or whatever and gave her those much-coveted roles as Leela, Mastani and Padmavaati. But did he really concentrate on Deepika's acting skills or just try to make her look beautiful? I think her worst performance till date is Padmavat. Bhansali thought he had cracked the code for her by showing her stoic face - keeping her dialogues minimal - not giving her tough scenes, etc. Her performance centred around her beauty and elegance.
I feel he didn't really exploit her acting skills like say, an Imtiaz Ali or Shoojit Sircar could. He typecast her and now people have a hard time remembering what she's capable of.
Good thing is, Chapaak, despite is its commercial failure, did more for her career than all 3 films of Bhansali's combined. She was really good as Malti. If people can forget the ugly controversy just before it, I think they will remember her perf. in the movie as the main highlight.
Discuss.
comment:
p_commentcount