Poll
Who would've been a better Anand Kumar in Super 30?
Poll Choice |
---|
Pankaj tripathi would have killed it but if they were going for a superstar then SRK could have fit the role better He can look convincing as a common man unlike Hritik who clearly looks like a model dressed up in simple clothes and painted with dirtπAlso that accent was atrocious.
I understand that this topic is to select Ugly lookers. But just bcoz SRK is equally Ugly does not mean he is a good actor. His Madrasi accent in RaOne is one of the shittiest ever π€£
i cannot see anyone else doing this role
This...
I am sure HR is gonna rock in this role. We should have this poll on 12th July
Pankaj Tripathi is ugly????? πππππ
Anyways that's not the point of this topic at all. The point is is that an actor who looks like a supermodel and Greek God cannot play a poor villager.
Why paint him black and have that awful accent when they could've actually gotten an actor who is himself a Bihari and actually looks like a common man?
Anand Kumar isn't Brad Pitt so they should've chosen an actor who fits the role physcially and actually looks the part. Fyi Hrithik is doing an awful job as an actor too. It's like he's playing Rohan all over again with a cringe worthy Bihari accent.
Originally posted by: ThunderLight
I understand that this topic is to select Ugly lookers. But just bcoz SRK is equally Ugly does not mean he is a good actor. His Madrasi accent in RaOne is one of the shittiest ever π€£
I just looked up Anand Kumar and he bears a closer resemblance to Pankaj Tripathi than protein head Hrithik Roshan.
BW must rid its habit of miscasting.smh
@bold Exactly even SRK can look like a common man convincingly. Yaha toh Ken Doll ko black paint kar diya hai πππ
Pankaj tripathi would have killed it but if they were going for a superstar then SRK could have fit the role better He can look convincing as a common man unlike Hritik who clearly looks like a model dressed up in simple clothes and painted with dirtπAlso that accent was atrocious.
`Pankaj is too old to play the lead role. Would have been funny seeing him opposite Mrunal
Good for you, but that's not what everyone else is saying on social media. I don't care if this movie becomes a super hit.
Hrithik as Anand is an awful casting and that accent is just cringe worthy.
This...
I am sure HR is gonna rock in this role. We should have this poll on 12th July
What??? Hrithik is 45 and Pankaj is 42 πππ
Originally posted by: JaggatJug
`Pankaj is too old to play the lead role. Would have been funny seeing him opposite Mrunal
Originally posted by: mystic786
Good for you, but that's not what everyone else is saying on social media. I don't care if this movie becomes a super hit.
Hrithik as Anand is an awful casting and that accent is just cringe worthy.
social media is big enough to find what you want to see.... there is a section who is using memes from super 30 to counter political views.... that kind of reflects positively and also helps in promotion... there is a section praising it and there is a section mocking it...
if you derive satisfaction from mocking group then good for you as well
Look wise, Pankaj suits the best. He is bihari and a great actor, added bonus. Just that for his younger day scenes, they need someone else. Coz even though Pankaj is 42, he looks older.
I would prefer Abhishek. He does serious roles better. He could have looked more convincing.
HR looks fine. Just that he has this tendency to go into his typical hamming, ott mode anytime in middle of the scene. That irritates me so much. Otherwise, let's see how he fares.
comment:
p_commentcount