Originally posted by: shruzzy
Are kabir's actions justified my take on kabir:
Kabir an army man but should a be judged on his proffession we see many army man are gaddar so judging his actions just because he is an army is not right according to me
But looking at a different side kabir took a stand against his family for kavya! ! So, He stands for feminism but does that mean he should take stand for pooja because pooja did wronged his family and kavya didnt again according to me taking stand for kavya and taking stand for pooja are 2 different pictures
Now coming to dhruv's actions! ! ! He was stopping his brother from being criminal thats right any brother on earth would do that but kabir is also doing a similar action the difference is he is not harming the main culprit he is using her weak points just as manohar did! !
My question is pooja used dhruv and harmed pk mittal and took away the property than dhruv came in the picture who wasn't a culprit but victim of circumstances tried to kill the min culprit of his life directly and kabir got humiliated in public and now he thinks that the talk is beyond revenge so he kidnapped the weakest point of the enemy and targeted her! ! !
So who is actually right? ? ? Pooja-no, dhruv-no, kabir-no because revenge is itself wrong but reasons? ? Who has the grave reasons to take revenge i will leave it upon u. . .
1. Pooja- suffering for 20 years without parents
2. Dhruv- betrayed by the love of his life
3. Kabir- 3 slaps in public (because before that he was ready to leave everything behind )
Note: i m not against any actor/character just using my pov of the current actions it may change according to the upcoming episodes! ! ! !
comment:
p_commentcount