Originally posted by: return_to_hades
You simply cannot be an advocate for equality and reject feminism or any of the social justice movements. You cannot balance the scales for equity without these.
Originally posted by: return_to_hades
You simply cannot be an advocate for equality and reject feminism or any of the social justice movements. You cannot balance the scales for equity without these.
Originally posted by: BlackPanther7
Just like there is a Ban on Dowry, there shud be Ban on Alimony. Women shud not feed on Husband's earnings. Just like women are not property. Same way, even Husband is also not Bank ATM. 😔
Originally posted by: anonymous39
This is pure ignorance. Dowry and alimony are not similar in any way. Alimony is given in order to level the playing field. In most marriages, one person always has to take the back seat and it's usually the woman. Because of that, they tend to earn a lot less money. If a divorce happens, they get screwed so alimony is a way to correct that.Let me give you an example of a couple I know in real life. He married at a fairly early age when he was still in medical school. His wife worked during that time while he studied. She paid the bills and the rent and helped him get his education. When he graduated, she had to quit her job and follow him to wherever he got accepted into the residency program. That meant that she was giving up chances at promotions and raises and advancement in her field because she had to put her husband's career first. She didn't find a new job in another location for a while. Then in essence she had to start over again. Once she settled in again, it was time for his residency to end and they had to move again where he got a real job.As a doctor, his income increased 10 fold while she was back to square one trying to look for another job. Then they had kids so once again, she had to quit her job because someone needed to look after them and it didn't make sense for the husband to do it. He continued working and earning a lot of money and getting promotions as the years went on. She didn't really have anything since whatever she had earned had been spent on his education, rent, food, etc. She had wages lost from constantly having to quit job and not be up for promotions. Then she had more lost earnings as she was home taking care of kids.Now supposed after 10-15 years together in total, a divorce occurred. He is financially very well off and earning loads of money. She has been working on and off and has gaps in her career because of child rearing. It's very tough to go back to work and get hired when you've been home for years. She very likely doesn't have money saved up in her own name either. On top of that, her career was never the high flying one her husband had. Then what? It's very unfair to leave that person struggling when they contributed just as much to the marriage as the husband did. That's why alimony is given. It is earned fair and square and is *her* money that belongs to her rightfully as part of the marriage.
Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi
Nobody is rejecting feminism. Least of all me.
You will find so many who thinks -- I support gender equality. but I don't support feminism.Why be -- you dumb at them. Nicely tell em.. it's the same thing. Politeness is basic. We shouldn't forget that while supporting feminism.
Originally posted by: BlackPanther7
This is based on the broad assumption that his career is growing continuously. I will give u another example.A man married a woman. They didnot get along and they divorced after 3 years. Now, he has to bear her expenses for the rest of his life. U think it is easier life for divorced men? If tomorrow, he gets married, imagine the financial stress on him?There has been so many cases where cunning fraud women misused the alimony laws to marry 4 different men n living off their individual alimony expenses and got arrested later.And what do u mean her money? It is HIS hard work n sweat which he was earning for his family n livelihood. She has no right to it after the marriage ends.To say she put her husband's career first is bit too much. Bcoz people get married to men with good jobs n good income only. So, the wife had no contribution to the career of these already successful men as such. No woman marries a low earning man.
Originally posted by: anonymous39
Honestly, the only thing this forum teaches me over and over is how much men truly seem to hate women. The kind of things written here are just disgusting.🤢
comment:
p_commentcount