Kangana Ranaut: I was physically abused by Aditya Pancholi, had seeked - Page 7

Originally posted by: maha15

16-17 yr old girl staying with Married Man...🤢... 

When with pancholi she seeked Zaria help, when with hrithik she spilled the news to papa Roshan. Is it some blackmail ?

ghanta you were abused , main kyun maanu teri baat , kyun nahi police complaint karke saja dilwayi , you the bastion of feminism (or should I say fake feminism

Originally posted by: Sri-R

When I was 14 there werecouple of men tried to groom me...I flew away from the scene like a frightened deer when I understood the intention. At that age I don't even have idea what sex is but something was uncomfortable enough that brain sent Run alert.😆

Edited by maha15 - 6 years ago

Originally posted by: -smolderhalder.

After seeing her real DOP I realized that she wasn't a minor when she met Aditya. 

In June 2004 she was already 18 years old which makes her an adult in most countries. So why in all of her interviews she says she was a minor when she first met him?

^In no way I'm trying to justify how that asshole Aditya Pancholi treated her but it did make me curious about why she says she was a minor when she met him when in reality she wasn't.

Originally posted by: -smolderhalder.

After seeing her real DOP I realized that she wasn't a minor when she met Aditya. 

In June 2004 she was already 18 years old which makes her an adult in most countries. So why in all of her interviews she says she was a minor when she first met him?

^In no way I'm trying to justify how that asshole Aditya Pancholi treated her but it did make me curious about why she says she was a minor when she met him when in reality she wasn't.

^^^^^ her brand of fake feminism is self serving and dangerous. Feminism is a hard enough concept for some to grasp, here she comes to muddy it and for what?!?!

Even if she was a minor, it doesnt matter because Pancholi could have a sexual relation with her with no legal consequences. She was seventeen, as she claims, so sexual rekatioms with anyone above 16 years then was legal.
And, why she keeps saying she was a minor? How does that change the scenario? He did not gag you to be with him. If he assaulted you, then go to the frgging police station. When Shiney's maid can accuse him of rape then you should also have the guts to voice your opinions.
Abhi toh badi badass banti ho, tab kya hua tha.Edited by Xx..Anjali..xX - 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Xx..Anjali..xX

Even if she was a minor, it doesnt matter because Pancholi could have a sexual relation with her with no legal consequences. She was seventeen, as she claims, so sexual rekatioms with anyone above 16 years then was legal.
And, why she keeps saying she was a minor? How does that change the scenario? He did not gag you to be with him. If he assaulted you, then go to the frgging police station. When Shiney's maid can accuse him of rape then you should also have the guts to voice your opinions.
Abhi toh badi badass banti ho, tab kya hua tha.

Originally posted by: Xx..Anjali..xX

Even if she was a minor, it doesnt matter because Pancholi could have a sexual relation with her with no legal consequences. She was seventeen, as she claims, so sexual rekatioms with anyone above 16 years then was legal.
And, why she keeps saying she was a minor? How does that change the scenario? He did not gag you to be with him. If he assaulted you, then go to the frgging police station. When Shiney's maid can accuse him of rape then you should also have the guts to voice your opinions.
Abhi toh badi badass banti ho, tab kya hua tha.