SlatePencil thumbnail
IPL 2025 Participants Thumbnail IPL 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
i know most of the fans are not liking the fact that sanyukta has developed feelings for aryan. but i don't find it wrong from her side.

a human being has both emotional and physical desires. after the marriage sandhir didn't consummate their marriage and randhir left a broken sanyukta.

since the past two years sanyukta must be craving for the love and physical satisfaction that a husband should give.

the sandhir kiss was hint towards what sanyukta wanted from randhir. now randhir can't be trusted. if sanyukta asks him to satisfy her physical desires, he may insult her.

so she has full right to seek these pleasures from any other guy and that does not make her characterless.

aryan will never refuse her, will make her feel like a woman and also protect her dignity.

i know whatever i have written is too bold but this the truth of life. only emotional love cannot keep two people connected for life long.

Created

Last reply

Replies

21

Views

3.2k

Users

12

Likes

22

Frequent Posters

romaila thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#2

Originally posted by: cherryTop

i know most of the fans are not liking the fact that sanyukta has developed feelings for aryan. but i don't find it wrong from her side.
She hasn't developed anything for that Kelua...its just an infatuation, credit goes to his DS avtaar🤢


a human being has both emotional and physical desires. after the marriage sandhir didn't consummate their marriage and randhir left a broken sanyukta.
Randhir left her for reasons, Both had played equal role in this separation track...spare Randhir pleajjj🥱

since the past two years sanyukta must be craving for the love and physical satisfaction that a husband should give.
Sanyukta is not a kind of person craving for love her love is her ambition which she had always by her side...what physical satisfaction😲🤢

the sandhir kiss was hint towards what sanyukta wanted from randhir. now randhir can't be trusted. if sanyukta asks him to satisfy her physical desires, he may insult her.

Hold on what are you saying🤢...now matter how she is what she does i strongly opposed to whatever you have written against her...cut it🤢

so she has full right to seek these pleasures from any other guy and that does not make her characterless.
Oh God...this is the limit🥱

aryan will never refuse her, will make her feel like a woman and also protect her dignity.

i know whatever i have written is too bold but this the truth of life. only emotional love cannot keep two people connected for life long.


Just cant believe it, never ever thought i will be reading kind of post like this🤢
Okay, i don't like Sanyukta...am Randhir fan and doesn't mean i would call her all those words or say something against her like this ever...NEVER!!!!🤢

She has full right in moving on BUT...for that Sanyukta needs to clear her doubts, whom she feels for Randhir or Kelu.

cousinsfantasy thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: cherryTop

i know most of the fans are not liking the fact that sanyukta has developed feelings for aryan. but i don't find it wrong from her side.


a human being has both emotional and physical desires. after the marriage sandhir didn't consummate their marriage and randhir left a broken sanyukta.

since the past two years sanyukta must be craving for the love and physical satisfaction that a husband should give.

the sandhir kiss was hint towards what sanyukta wanted from randhir. now randhir can't be trusted. if sanyukta asks him to satisfy her physical desires, he may insult her.

so she has full right to seek these pleasures from any other guy and that does not make her characterless.

aryan will never refuse her, will make her feel like a woman and also protect her dignity.

i know whatever i have written is too bold but this the truth of life. only emotional love cannot keep two people connected for life long.

well do u mean she should choose lust over love thanks got ur point
FlawSomeME thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#4
WTH is this one month k baad 4um par aayi & mila toh yeh...my good luck & ur bad luck gal/boy, coz itz not Bhatt camps' movie or show and na hi iska concept itna adult h...*yeh aur baat h ki most of the times RD kiss karte time ImranHashmi sa behav karta h & Sanyu MallikaSheravat si*...&...if only 4 u, ye physical need condition Sanyu par apply kar diya jaye toh, RD par b hona banta h and i think u know, y sometimes boyz r lik dog ka term use hota h...so, do't justify her lik this way...*waise b bahut se logo ko yaha charecterless & confused ka diffrance nahi pata*
SlatePencil thumbnail
IPL 2025 Participants Thumbnail IPL 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 9 years ago
#5
@romaila i think you misunderstood my post. i am not against sanyukta. i understand and respect her hidden desires.

@counsinsfantasy it is not lust. it is need of human beings which writers are showing very well.

@Loveberry randhir tried to kiss sanaya that day. it was out of physical desire only but sanaya did not allow him. randhir craves to get his physical thirst fulfilled by sanyukta but his ego doesnot allow him to do so. sanyukta is not confused about aryan. she wants to get that divine pleasure from him which no other guy gave him and i don't think it is wrong. a wife can seek divorce from her husband on the grounds that he is not sexually active.
alnkrita1919 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#6
I agree there's nothing wrong in having feelings for someone. But the show is not about a girl with physical desires.Never did the CVs show any such scene where she craves for physical intimacy so wherebdid you get this idea from?. You maybe right about ones emotional n physical needs but its not the case with sanyukta.I guess you confused attraction with physical needs.
Edited by alnkrita1919 - 9 years ago
ILoveNature thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#7
first of all i don't have any problem if she really have felling for him because that happens when someone loves you and care for you. Motivated you when you need the most actually does everything that you always wanted. But i want clarity with her fellings but i thought she is also confuse as us that she has felling for him or not.
Secondly the physical part which i don't wanted to comment because that your view maybe you saw something which i never. In my view she is with him because he blindly trust her, care for her, support her, can do anything for her and her dreams.
And the kiss part well kiss happened with mutual understanding she didn't force him. If that hint what she wanted then Randhir also in same boat.
Edited by Unisha123 - 9 years ago
Preethi1 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#8
this is too much! i certainly donot agree with this! even in real life there is much more to physical realtionship ... get that in ur mind!
regarding sanyukta! she was and is not having any kind of craving as u mentioned! Love is togetherness.. being a support! being there for each other.. not just being physical... even sanyukta is dishearted tat rd left her when she needed him the most! here i mean an emotional support! not physical craving! & aryan according to her is supportive & tats y she likes her company not physical cravings again! get ur facts right!
romaila thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: cherryTop

@romaila i think you misunderstood my post. i am not against sanyukta. i understand and respect her hidden desires.


Sandhir never craved for physical satisfaction🤓
Jemimah90 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#10
Love is a different phenomena,it is like food for the soul, love is independent it does not need any object or subject to survive it is like fragnance to a flower it just emits whether you enjoy it or not .you can observe this in great souls they permeate love in their surroundings where ever they are . love is your intrinsic nature, everybody can't love you have to learn to love because you are deviated by society because people of loving nature are dangerous to society so you are asked to love mother in one way your wife in a different way and neighbor women in a different manner. if there is a person who loves everyone in a similar way like a jesus or buddha who loves saint and sinner ,royal women or prostitute in a similar way then society structure will be destroyed there will be a great transformation

so first question must be clarified what is your perception of love ??

the least form of love is sex ,middle form is general love like mothers love some lovers love highest form of love is compassion this can be possible to jesus or buddha only

satisfaction comes only in physical plane, you can have satisfaction through sex , or in food ,earning money or work..

Satisfaction stems from a selfish desire to have someone or something. We want the individual (sexually or otherwise) so much that we feel we are willing to go to any length to get them.

Love tends more toward desires for the individual we love. We seek to see the person we love be happy. We work to keep them happy even if demands sacrifice on our part.

Keep in mind that love and satisfaction are not mutually exclusive. It is possible and in fact common to both selfishly desire someone and want the best for them. I think it is our sense of infatuation that generates jealousy most of the time; however, love can also produce jealousy or outrage when we see the person we love with someone that we know is not good for them.

If you think you're in love, ask whether what you are giving the person is conditional on reciprocation. If it is, then you are likely giving to the other person in order to selfishly lure them closer to you ... and this stems from infatuation. If you are giving and sacrificing for another and derive happiness from their happiness without expecting returns outside their happiness, then this is more akin to actual love.

Of course, one can only give so much without reciprocation so I think that when we say we are "in love" with someone, we both desire them as a part of our own happiness AND desire to see them happy ... a sort of Taoist balance between infatuation , satisfaction and love.

p.s: both are difficult to compare in their pure sense because they exist in different planes , even i answered question assuming you may thought about this in this way 😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".