rnarayan thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
What crap order by the presiding officer/judge in today episode of YHM, I think he lost his mind or no knowledge of Indian law. The custody cases in India governed by Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 not by Contract Law, also in these matters child statement is required as this law is welfare of child. A judge cannot give custody of child to some one on sole ground that the parties reaches on some agreement when one party is retracting from it. Before awarding to some one court have to think whether child welfare lies with him/her or not?
Totally illogical on the point of law in today episode but for drama quotient it is okay.

Created

Last reply

Replies

1

Views

847

Users

2

Likes

5

Frequent Posters

Millerrr88 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
I agree...but its a ekta show and a soap so don't expect any logic 😕

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".