Originally posted by: charminggenie
She was brought in a witness assuming that she saw the event- she was presented by Manik's lawyer who claimed that nandini saw the event. Noyonika mentioned it to her earlier itself. Or else why would Magistrate hear Nandini's testimony if her being unconscious didn't matter.Again TFQ, I ask- did Nandini say anything wrong. Is that factually wrong? if not then why cannot Manik support her truth when he knows that is exactly what happened?