Historical Discussion on Ashoka and Storyline - Page 12

Created

Last reply

Replies

139

Views

125357

Users

48

Likes

625

Frequent Posters

Sweet_Krishna thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: HaremSultan

         Ashoka after the Kalinga war consolidated his southern conquests. He was a Buddhist but he did not follow its principles blindly like Chandragupta did. He followed the middle path between Cruelty and Pacifism.

 


Ashok was not a born buddhist. He was born to kshatriya father and an ajivika brahmin mother. He got influenced by Buddhism after witnessing the horrors of Kalinga war. Unlike his grandfather, who took up jain asceticism in his later life, Ashok did not turn a shraman and continued with his duties as a king. He did start avoiding wars after he turned to buddhism.

In my opinion, taking up Buddhism and going fully pacifist is not becoming of a kshatriya. A kshatriya should always be ready to take up arms to uphold righteousness and should not indulge in mindless violence. Mauryan empire could not sustain after Ashok because the dynasty went fully into  Buddhism. You cannot save your kingdom from enemies and invading barbarians from the west just by being pacifist.


Sphinx. thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
oh!! I have lot to read here..and expecting one like this..thanks..will visit soon
history_geek thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
Hi all...


Read some thing interesting on Chanakya..
So, decided to share it here.. :))

-> Chanakya's "Novel" Method 2 Test Character of Ministers
Click Here to Read


^^^ A master politician, indeed.  :-P


Meself thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: history_geek

Hi all...


Read some thing interesting on Chanakya..
So, decided to share it here.. :))

-> Chanakya's "Novel" Method 2 Test Character of Ministers
Click Here to Read


^^^ A master politician, indeed.  :-P



Abhay, do have an access to the unabridged version of Arthshashtra? I have no intentions to read, adultered form of this amazing book! 
.FemmeFatale. thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
Im finding the fictitious aspect in the show puke worthy
But I still the show has scope once the bindusara aspect is sidelined. Lets see.

What upsets me the most is Chanakya's portrayal. It lacks depth. And whatever can I say about Dharma. Idk how the most neglected wife can be Bindusara's love of his life.  

Also I honestly want to know. Did Dharma spend so many years estranged? I mean was Bindusara really not aware of Ashoka's existence? 
Meself thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: The.Patthaaka.

Im finding the fictitious aspect in the show puke worthy

But I still the show has scope once the bindusara aspect is sidelined. Lets see.

What upsets me the most is Chanakya's portrayal. It lacks depth. And whatever can I say about Dharma. Idk how the most neglected wife can be Bindusara's love of his life.  

Also I honestly want to know. Did Dharma spend so many years estranged? I mean was Bindusara really not aware of Ashoka's existence? 


Bindusara always knew who Asoka was! They shared an estranged relationship rather Asoka hated his father vehemently!

Dharma was a neglected queen and had little to do with ways of the politics of the empire.

I am liking Manoj Joshi as Chanakya. He seems to be fitting the bill really nicely!
history_geek thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Meself


Abhay, do have an access to the unabridged version of Arthshashtra? I have no intentions to read, adultered form of this amazing book! 



Shivani, I am still looking for the unabridged one. Will inform without fail, whenever i get it. I am very much interested in reading it. :)


IlaTanwar thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: HaremSultan

Helen, the queen of Chandragupta was not a negative character in true History. Though sources are very meager to know about her here are the facts:

  • Bindusara was already 16 when chandu married Helen.
  • Chandragupta used to send gifts to Selecus and maintained very good and humble relations after the treaty. This also suggest she may had been Mahishi means favorite queen. Mahishi at first was used for first queen but later it was also used for favorite queen.
  • Bindusara after his coronation maintained warm relations with Antiochus soter, successor of Selecus and used to send friendly letters to him.
  • We find no evidence of any ploy to kill Bindusara in history. His coronation was very peaceful and if there was any ploy he had killed them because he was called AMITRAGHAT means Slayer of foes and Ajatshatru means with no enemies. This should not be confused with KING ajatshatru who was son of bimbisara.

 


i only know that lady helena was married to chandragupt in pretext of killing him later she fell for him. she told this to chanakya and chanakya made a plan to save her and chandragupt i forgot that... 


PutijaChalhov thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 9 years ago
For those interested to read here is what was written in Discovery of India about ChandraGupta regime Patliputra and Chankaya who is also known as Kautaliya

Chandragupta and Chanakya. The Maurya Empire
Established


Buddhism spread gradually in India. Although in origin a
Kshatriya movement, and representing a conflict between the
ruling class and the priests, its ethical and democratic aspect,
and more especially its fight against priestcraft and ritualism,
appealed to the people. It developed as a popular reform move-
ment, attracting even some Brahmin thinkers. But generally
Brahmins opposed it and called Buddhists heretics and rebels
against the established faith. More important than the outward
progress was the interaction of Buddhism and the older faith on
each other, and the continuous undermining of Brahmins. Two
and a half centuries later, the Emperor Ashoka became a con-
vert to the faith and devoted all his energies to spreading it by
peaceful missionary efforts in India and foreign countries.

These two centuries saw many changes in India. Various
processes had long been going on to bring about racial fusion
and to amalgamate the petty states and small kingdoms and
republics; the old urge to build up a united centralized state
had been working, and out of all this emerged a powerful and
highly developed empire. Alexander's invasion of the north-west
gave the final push to this development, and two remarkable
men arose who could take advantage of the changing conditions
and mould them according to their will. These men were
Chandragupta Maurya and his friend and minister and coun-
sellor, the Brahmin, Chanakya. This combination functioned
well. Both had been exiled from the powerful Nanda kingdom
of Magadha, which had its headquarters at Pataliputra (the
modern Patna); both went to Taxila in the north-west and came
in contact with the Greeks stationed there by Alexander. Chan-
dragupta met Alexander himself; he heard of his conquests and
glory and was fired by ambition to emulate him. Chandragupta
and Chanakya watched and prepared themselves; they hatched
great and ambitious schemes and waited for the opportunity to
realize them.



Soon news came of Alexander's death at Babylon in 323 B.C.,
and immediately Chandragupta and Chanakya raised the old
and ever-new cry of nationalism and roused the people against
the foreign invader. The Greek garrison was driven away and
Taxila captured. The appeal to nationalism had brought allies
to Chandragupta and he marched with them across north India
to Pataliputra. Within two years of Alexander's death, he was in
possession of that city and kingdom and the Maurya Empire had
been established.

Alexander's general, Seleucus, who had inherited after his
chiefs death the countries from Asia Minor to India, tried to
re-establish his authority in north-west India and crossed the
Indus with an army. He was defeated and had to cede a part
of Afghanistan, up to Kabul and Herat, to Chandragupta, who
also married the daughter of Seleucus. Except for south India,
Chandragupta's empire covered the whole of India, from the
Arabian Sea to the Bay of Bengal, and extended in the north
to Kabul. For the first time in recorded history a vast centra-
lized state had risen in India. The city of Pataliputra was the
capital of this great empire.

What was this new state like ? Fortunately we have full accounts,
both Indian and Greek. Megasthenes, the ambassador sent by
Seleucus, has left a record and, much more important is that
contemporary account " Kautilya's 'Arthashastra,' the 'Science
of Polity,' to which reference has already been made. Kautilya
is another name for Chanakya, and thus we have a book written,
not only by a great scholar, but a man who played a dominating
part in the establishment, growth and preservation of the empire.
Chanakya has been called the Indian Machiavelli, and to some
extent the comparison is justified. But he was a much bigger person
in every way, greater in intellect and action. He was no mere
follower of a king, a humble adviser of an all-powerful emperor.
A picture of him emerges from an old Indian play " the Mudra-
Rakshasa " which deals with this period. Bold and scheming,
proud and revengeful, never forgetting a slight, never forgetting
his purpose, availing himself of every device to delude and defeat
the enemy, he sat with the reins of empire in his hands and looked
upon the emperor more as a loved pupil than as a master.
Simple and austere in his life, uninterested in the pomp and
pageantry of high position, when he had redeemed his pledge and
accomplished his purpose, he wanted to retire, Brahmin-like, to
a life of contemplation.

There was hardly anything Chanakya would have refrained
from doing to achieve his purpose; he was unscrupulous enough;
yet he was also wise enough to know that this very purpose might
be defeated by means unsuited to the end. Long before Clause-



vvitz, he is reported to have said that war is only a continuance
of state policy by other means. But, he adds, war must always
serve the larger ends of policy and not become an end in itself;
the statesman's objective must always be the betterment of the
state as a result of war, not the mere defeat and destruction of
the enemy. If war involves both parties in a common ruin, that
is the bankruptcy of statesmanship. War must be conducted by
armed forces; but much more important than the force of arms
is the high strategy which saps the enemy's morale and disrupts
his forces and brings about his collapse, or takes him to the verge
of collapse, before armed attack. Unscrupulous and rigid as
Chanakya was in the pursuit of his aim, he never forgot that it was
better to win over an intelligent and high-minded enemy than to
crush him. His final victory was obtained by sowing discord in
the enemy's ranks, and, in the very moment of this victory, so the
story goes, he induced Chandragupta to be generous to his rival
chief. Chanakya himself is said to have handed over the insignia
of his own high office to the minister of that rival, whose intelli-
gence and loyalty to his old chief had impressed him greatly. So
the story ends not in the bitterness of defeat and humiliation,
but in reconciliation and in laying the firm and enduring found-
ations of a state, which had not only defeated but won over its
chief enemy.

The Maurya Empire maintained diplomatic relations with
the Greek world, both with Seleucus and his successors and with
Ptolemy Pliiladelphus. These relations rested on the solid found-
ation of mutual commercial interest. Strabo tells us that the
Oxus river in central Asia formed a link in an important chain
along which Indian goods were carried to Europe by way of the
Caspian and the Black Sea. This route was popular in the third
century B.C. Central Asia then was rich and fertile. More than
a thousand years later it began to dry up. The Arthashastra
mentions that the king's stud had Arabian steeds'!

The Organization of the State

What was this new state like that arose in 321 B.C. and covered
far the greater part of India, right up to Kabul in the north?
It was an autocracy, a dictatorship at the top, as most empires
were and still are. There was a great deal of local autonomy in
the towns and village units, and elective elders looked after these
local affairs. This local autonomy was greatly prized and hardly
any king or supreme ruler interfered with it. Nevertheless, the
influence and many-sided activities of the central government
were all-pervasive, and in some ways this Mauryan state reminds
one of modern dictatorships. There could have been then, in

a purely agricultural age, nothing like the control of the individual
by the state which we see to-day. But, in spite of limitations, an
effort was made to control and regulate life. The state was very
far from being just a police state, interested in keeping external
and internal peace and collecting revenue.

There was a widespread and rigid bureaucracy and there are
frequent references to espionage. Agriculture was regulated in
many ways, so were rates of interest. Regulation and periodical
inspection took place of food, markets, manufacturers, slaughter-
houses, cattle-raising, water rights, sports, courtesans, and drink-
ing saloons. Weights and measures were standardized. The
cornering and adulteration of foodstuffs were rigorously punish-
ed. Trade was taxed, and, so also in some respects, the practice
of religion. When there was a breach of regulation or some other
misdemeanour, the temple monies were confiscated. If rich
people were found guilty of embezzlement or of profiting from
national calamity, their property was also confiscated. Sanitation
and hospitals were provided and there were medical men at the
chief centres. The state gave relief to widows, orphans, the sick,
and the infirm. Famine relief was a special care of the state, and
half the stores in all the state warehouses were always kept in
reserve for times of scarcity and famine.

All these rules and regulations were probably applied far
more to the cities than to the villages; and it is also likely that
practice lagged far behind theory. Nevertheless, even the theory
is interesting. The village communities were practically auto-
nomous.

Chanakya's Arthashastra deals with a vast variety of subjects
and covers almost every aspect of the theory and practice of
government. It discusses the duties of the king, of his ministers
and councillors, of council meetings, of departments of govern-
ment, of diplomacy, of war and peace. It gives details of the vast
army which Chandragupta had, consisting of infantry, cavalry,
chariots, and elephants.* And yet Chanakya suggests that mere
numbers do not count for much; without discipline and proper
leaderhip they may become a burden. Defence and fortifications
are also dealt with.

Among the other matters discussed in the book are trade and
commerce, law and law courts, municipal government, social
customs, marriage and divorce, rights of women, taxation and
revenue, agriculture, the working of mines and factories, arti-
sans, markets, horticulture, manufactures, irrigation, and water-

(* The game ofchess, which had its origin in India, probably developed from this fourfold
conception of the army. It was called 'chaturanga ' four-limbed, from which came the word
'shatrang'. Alberuni gives an account of this game as played in India by four players. )



ways, ships and navigation, corporations, census operations,
fisheries, slaughter houses, passports, and jails. Widow remar-
riage is recognized; also divorce under certain circumstances.

There is a reference to chinapatta, silk fabrics of China manu-
facture, and a distinction is made between these and the silk
made in India. Probably the latter was of a coarser variety.
The importation of Chinese silk indicates trade contacts with
China at least as early as the fourth century B.C.

The king, at the time of his coronation, had to take the oath
of service to the people " 'May I be deprived of heaven, of life,
and of offspring if I oppress you.' 'In the happiness of his sub-
jects lies his happiness; in their welfare, whatever pleases him-
self he shall consider as not good, but whatever pleases his sub-
jects, he shall consider as good.' 'If a king is energetic, his subjects
will be equally energetic' Public work could not suffer or await
the king's pleasure; he had always to be ready for it. And if the
king misbehaved, his people had the right to remove him and
put another in his place.

There was an irrigation department to look after the many
canals, and a navigation department for the harbours, ferries,
bridges, and the numerous boats and ships that went up and
down the rivers and crossed the seas to Burma and beyond.
There was apparently some kind of navy, too, as an adjunct of
the army.

Trade flourished in the empire and great roads connected the
distant parts, with frequent rest-houses for travellers. The chief
road was named King's Way and this went right across the coun-
try from the capital to the north-west frontier. Foreign mer-
chants are especially mentioned and provided for, and seem to
have enjoyed a kind of extra-territoriality. It is said that the old
Egyptians wrapped their mummies in Indian muslins and dyed
their cloth with indigo obtained from India. Some kind of glass
has also been discovered in the old remains. Megasthenes, the
Greek ambassador, tells us that the Indians loved finery and
beauty, and even notes the use of the shoe to add to one's height.

There was a growth of luxury in the Maurya Empire. Life
becomes more complicated, specialized," and organized. 'Inns,
hostelries, eating-houses, serais, and gaming-houses are evidently
numerous; sects and crafts have their meeting places and the
latter their public dinners. The business of entertainment pro-
vides a livelihood for various classes of dancers, singers, and actors.
Even the villages are visited by them, and the author of the
Arthashastra is inclined to discourage the existence of a common
hall used for their shows as too great a distraction from the life
of the home and the fields. At the same time there are penalties
for refusal to assist in organizing public entertainment. The king

provides in amphitheatres, constructed for the occasion, dra-
matic, boxing, and other contests of men and animals, and also
spectacles with displays of pictured objects of curiosity., .not
seldom the streets were lighted for festivals.'* There were also
royal processions and hunts.

There were many populous cities in this vast empire, but the
chief of them was the capital, Pataliputra, a magnificent city
spread out along the banks of the Ganges, where the Sone river
meets it (the modern Patna). Megasthenes describes it thus:
'At the junction of this river (Ganges) with another is situated
Palibothra, a city of eighty stadia (9-2 miles) in length and fifteen
stadia (1-7 miles) in breadth. It is of a shape of a parallelogram
and is girded with a wooden wall, pierced with loopholes for
the discharge of arrows. It has a ditch in front for defence and
for receiving the sewage of the city. This ditch, which encompassed
it all round, is 600 feet in breadth and thirty cubits in depth, and
the wall is crowned with 570 towers and has four and sixty gates.'

Not only was this great wall made of wood, but most of the
houses also. Apparently this was a precaution against earth-
quakes, as that area was peculiarly liable to them. In 1934 the
great Bihar earthquake forcibly reminded us of this fact. Because
the houses were of wood, very elaborate precautions against fire
were taken. Every householder had to keep ladders, hooks, and
vessels full of water.

Pataliputra had a municipality elected by the people. It had
thirty members, divided up into six committees of five members
each, dealing with industries and handicrafts, deaths and births,
manufactures, arrangements for travellers and pilgrims, etc. The
whole municipal council looked after finance, sanitation, water
supply, public buildings, and gardens.

Edited by PutijaChalhov - 9 years ago
Meself thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
Warfare- An excerpt from Arthashashtra


This is a translated excerpt by Kathiresan Ramachanderam and Dayrne Jessica Ward dealing with ethics of warfare!



Warfare is the art of deception. Therefore, if able, appear unable, if active, appear not active, if near, appear far, if far, appear near. If they have the advantage, entice them; if they are confused, take them, if they are substantial, prepare for them, if they are strong, avoid them, if they are angry, disturb them, if they are humble, make them haughty, if they are relaxed, toil them, if they are united, separate them. Attack when they are not prepared, go out to where they do not expect. Generally in warfare, keeping a nation intact is best, destroying a nation second best; keeping an army intact is best, destroying an army second best; keeping a battalion intact is best, destroying a battalion second best; keeping a company intact is best, destroying a company second best; keeping a squad intact is best, destroying a squad second best. Therefore, to gain a hundred victories in a hundred battles is not the highest excellence; to subjugate the enemy's army without doing battle is the highest of excellence. 




Therefore, the best warfare strategy is to attack the enemies plans, next is to attack alliances, next is to attack the army, and the worst is to attack a walled city. Laying siege to a city is only done when other options are not available. To build large protective shields, armored wagons, and make ready the necessary arms and equipment will require at least three months. To build earthen mounds against the walls will require another three months. If the general cannot control his temper and sends troops to swarm the walls, one third of them will be killed, and the city will still not be taken. This is the kind of calamity that befall an army when laying siege to a walled city. Therefore, one who is skilled in the principles of warfare subdues the enemy without doing battle, takes the enemy's walled city without attacking, and overthrows the enemy quickly, without protracted warfare. His aim must be to take all intact. Therefore, weapons will not be blunted, and gains will be intact. These are the principles of planning attacks. Generally in warfare: If ten times the enemy's strength, surround them; if five times, attack them; if double, divide them; if equal, be able to fight them; if fewer, be able to evade them; if weaker, be able to avoid them. Therefore, a smaller army that is inflexible will be captured by a larger one. A general is the safeguard of the nation. 




When this support is in place, the nation will certainly be strong. When this support is not in place, the nation will certainly not be strong. There are two ways the ruler can bring difficulty to the army: To order an advance when not realizing the army is in no position to advance, or to order a withdrawal when not realizing the army is in no position to withdraw. This is called entangling the army. By not knowing the army's matters, and administering the army the same as administering civil matters, the officers and troops will be confused. By not knowing the army's calculations, and taking command of the army, the officers and troops will be hesitant. When the army is confused and hesitant, the neighboring rulers will take advantage. This is called a confused and hesitant army leading another to victory. 





Therefore, there are five factors of knowing who will win: One who knows when he can fight, and when he cannot fight, will be victorious; one who knows how to use both large and small forces will be victorious; one who knows how to unite upper and lower ranks in purpose will be victorious; one who is prepared and waits for the unprepared will be victorious; one whose general is able and is not interfered by the ruler will be victorious. These five factors are the way to know who will win. Therefore I say: One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be in danger in a hundred battles. One who does not know the enemy but knows himself will sometimes win, sometimes lose. One who does not know the enemy and does not know himself will be in danger in every battle. Encampment is on a site declared to be the best according to the science of buildings, the leader, the carpenterand the astrologer should measure a circular, rectangular, or square spot for the camp which should, in accordance with the available space, consist of four gates, six roads, and nine divisions. Provided with ditches, parapets, walls, doors, and watch towers for defense against fear, the quarters of the king, 1,000 bows long and half as broad, should be situated in one of the nine divisions to the north from the centre, while to the west of it his harem, and at its extremity the army of the harem are to be situated. In his front, the place for worshipping gods; to his right the departments of finance and accounts; and to his left the quarters of elephants and horses mounted by the king himself. 





Outside this and at a distance of 100 bows from each other, there should be fixed four cart-poles pillars and walls. In the first (of these four divisions), the prime minister and the priest (should have their quarters); to its right the store-house and the kitchen: to its left the store of raw products and weapons; in the second division the quarters of the hereditary army and of horses and chariots: outside this, hunters and keepers of dogs with their trumpets and with fire; also spies and sentinels; also, to prevent the attack of enemies, wells, mounds and thorns should be arranged. The eighteen divisions of sentinels employed for the purpose of securing the safety of the king should be changing their watches in turn. In order to ascertain the movements of spies, a time-table of business should also be prepared during the day. Disputes, drinking, social gatherings, and gambling should also be prohibited. The system of passports should also be observed. The officer in charge of the boundary (of the camp) should supervise the conduct of the commander-in-chief and the observance of the instructions given to the army.




 The instructor with his retinue and with carpenters and free laborers should carefully march in front on the road, and should dig wells of water. Having prepared a list of the villages and forests situated on the road with reference to their capacity to supply grass, firewood and water, the march of the army should be regulated according to the program of short and long halts. Food and provisions should be carried in double the quantity that may be required in any emergency. In the absence of separate means to carry food, the army itself should be entrusted with the business of carrying them; or they may be stored in a central place. In front the leader; in the centre the harem and the master (the king); on the sides horses and bodyguards; at the extremity of the (marching) circular-array, elephants and the surplus army; on all sides the army habituated to forest-life; and other troops following the camp, the commissariat, the army of an ally, and his followers should select their own road: for armies who have secured suitable positions will prove superior in fight to those who are in bad positions. 



The army of the lowest quality can march a 5 5/44 miles a day; that of the middle quality and a half and the best army double that. Hence, it is easy to ascertain the rate of the march. The commander should march behind and put up his camp in the front. In case of any obstruction, the army should march in crocodile array in the front, in cart-like array behind, and on the sides in diamond-like array (i.e., in four or five rows, each having its front, rear and sides) and in a compact array on all sides. When the army is marching on a path passable by a single man, it should march in pin-like array. When peace is made with one and war is to be waged with another, steps should be taken to protect the friends who are bringing help against enemies, such as an enemy in the rear, his ally, a king, or a neutral king. Roads with obstructions should be examined and cleared. Finance, the army, the strength of the armies of friends, enemies, and wild tribes, the prospect of rains, and the seasons should be thoroughly examined.  When the protective power of fortifications and stores (of the enemies) is on its decay, when it is thought that distress of the hired army or of a friend's army (of the enemy) is impending; when intriguers are not for a quick march; or when the enemy is likely to come to terms (with the invader), slow march should be made; otherwise quick march should be made. 





Waters may be crossed by means of elephants, planks spread over pillars erected, bridges, boats, timber and mass of bamboos, as well as by means of dry sour gourds, big baskets covered with skins, rafts. When the crossing of a river is obstructed by the enemy, the invader may cross it elsewhere together with his elephants and horses, and entangle the enemy in an ambuscade.  He should protect his army when it has to pass a long desert without water; when it is without grass, firewood and water; when it has to traverse a difficult road; when it is harassed by an enemy's attacks; when it is suffering from hunger and thirst after a journey; when it is ascending or descending a mountainous country full of mire, water-pools, rivers and cataracts; when it finds itself crowded in a narrow and difficult path; when it is halting, starting or eating; when it is tired from a long march; when it is sleepy; when it is suffering from a disease, pestilence or famine; when a great portion of its infantry, cavalry and elephants is diseased; when it is not sufficiently strong; or when it is under troubles. He should destroy the enemy's army under such circumstances. When the enemy's army is marching through a path traversable by a single man, the commander (of the invader's army) should ascertain its strength by estimating the quantity of food-stuffs, grass, bedding, and other requisites, fire pots, flags and weapons. He should also conceal those of his own army.





 Keeping a mountainous or river fortress with all its resources at his back in his own country he should fight or put up his camp. He who is possessed of a strong army, who has succeeded in his intrigues, and who has applied remedies against dangers may undertake an open fight, if he has secured a position favorable to himself; otherwise a treacherous fight. He should strike the enemy when the latter's army is under troubles or is furiously attacked; or he who has secured a favorable position may strike the enemy entangled in an unfavorable position. Or he who possesses control over the elements of his own state may, through the aid of the enemy's traitors, enemies and inimical wild tribes, make a false impression of his own defeat on the mind of the enemy who is entrenched in a favorable position, and having thus dragged the enemy into an unfavorable position, he may strike the latter. When the enemy's army is in a compact body, he should break it by means of his elephants; when the enemy has come down from its favorable position, following the false impression of the invader's defeat, the invader may turn back and strike the enemy's army, broken or unbroken. Having struck the front of the enemy's army, he may strike it again by means of his elephants and horses when it has shown its back and is running away. When frontal attack is unfavorable, he should strike it from behind; when attack on the rear is unfavorable, he should strike it in front; when attack on one side is unfavorable, he should strike it on the other. Or having caused the enemy to fight with his own army of traitors, enemies and wild tribes, the invader should with his fresh army strike the enemy when tired. Or having through the aid of the army of traitors given to the enemy the impression of defeat, the invader with full confidence in his own strength may allure and strike the over-confident enemy. 





Or the invader, if he is vigilant, may strike the careless enemy when the latter is deluded with the thought that the invader's merchants, camp and carriers have been destroyed. Or having made his strong force look like a weak force, he may strike the enemy's brave men when falling against him. Or having captured the enemy's cattle or having destroyed the enemy's dogs, he may induce the enemy's brave men to come out and may slay them. Or having made the enemy's men sleepless by harassing them at night, he may strike them during the day, when they are weary from want of sleep and are parched by heat, himself being under the shade. Or with his army of elephants enshrouded with cotton and leather dress, he may offer a night-battle to his enemy. Or he may strike the enemy's men during the afternoon when they are tired by making preparations during the forenoon; or he may strike the whole of the enemy's army when it is facing the sun. A desert, a dangerous spot, marshy places, mountains, valleys, uneven boats, cows, cart-like array of the army, mist, and night are temptations alluring the enemy against the invader. The beginning of an attack is the time for treacherous fights. As to an open or fair fight, a virtuous king should call his army together, and, specifying the place and time of battle, address them thus: "I am a paid servant like yourselves; this country is to be enjoyed (by me) together with you; you have to strike the enemy specified by me." His minister and priest should encourage the army by saying thus:-- "It is declared in the bibles that the goal which is reached by sacrifices after performing the final ablutions in sacrifices in which the priests have been duly paid for is the very goal which brave men are destined to attain." 





About this there are the two verses--  Beyond those places which priests, desirous of getting into heaven, attain together with their sacrificial instruments by performing a number of sacrifices, or by practicing penance are the places which brave men, losing life in good battles, are destined to attain immediately. Let not a new vessel filled with water, consecrated and covered over with grass be the acquisition of that man who does not fight in return for the subsistence received by him from his master, and who is therefore destined to go to hell. Astrologers and other followers of the king should infuse spirit into his army by pointing out the impregnable nature of the array of his army, his power to associate with gods, and his omniscience; and they should at the same time frighten the enemy. The day before the battle, the king should fast and lie down on his chariot with weapons. He should also make oblations into the fire pronouncing the verses of the war godand cause prayers to be offered for the good of the victors as well as of those who attain to heaven by dying in the battle-field. He should also submit his person to priests; he should make the central portion of his army consist of such men as are noted for their bravery, skill, high birth, and loyalty and as are not displeased with the rewards and honors bestowed on them. The place that is to be occupied by the king is that portion of the army which is composed of his father, sons, brothers, and other men, skilled in using weapons, and having no flags and head-dress. 



He should mount an elephant or a chariot, if the army consists mostly of horses; or he may mount that kind of animal, of which the army is mostly composed or which is the most skillfully trained. One who is disguised like the king should attend to the work of arraying the army.  Soothsayers and court bards should describe heaven as the goal for the brave and hell for the timid; and also extol the birth, corporation, family, deeds, and character of his men. The followers of the priest should proclaim the auspicious aspects of the witchcraft performed. Spies, carpenters and astrologers should also declare the success of their own operations and the failure of those of the enemy. After having pleased the army with rewards and honors, the commander-in-chief should address it and say:-- A hundred thousand for slaying the king (the enemy); fifty thousand for slaying the commander-in-chief, and the heir-apparent; ten thousand for slaying the chief of the brave; five thousand for destroying an elephant, or a chariot; a thousand for killing a horse, a hundred for slaying the chief of the infantry; twenty for bringing a head; and twice the pay in addition to whatever is seized. This information should be made known to the leaders of every group of ten (men). 





Physicians with surgical instruments, machines, remedial oils, and cloth in their hands; and women with prepared food and beverage should stand behind, uttering encouraging words to fighting men. The army should be arrayed on a favorable position, facing other than the south quarter, with its back turned to the sun, and capable to rush as it stands. If the array is made on an unfavorable spot, horses should be run. If the army arrayed on an unfavorable position is confined or is made to run away from it (by the enemy), it will be subjugated either as standing or running away; otherwise it will conquer the enemy when standing or running away. The even, uneven, and complex nature of the ground in the front or on the sides or in the rear should be examined. On an even site, staff-like or circular array should be made; and on an uneven ground, arrays of compact movement or of detached bodies should be made. Having broken the whole army (of the enemy), (the invader) should seek for peace; if the armies are of equal strength, he should make peace when requested for it; and if the enemy's army is inferior, he should attempt to destroy it, but not that which has secured a favorable position and is reckless of life.  When a broken army, reckless of life, resumes its attack, its fury becomes irresistible; hence he should not harass a broken army (of the enemy). Favorable positions for infantry, cavalry, chariots, and elephants are desirable both for war and camp. 





For men who are trained to fight in desert tracts, forests, valleys, or plains, and for those who are trained to fight from ditches or heights, during the day or night, and for elephants which are bred in countries with rivers, mountains, marshy lands, or lakes, as well as for horses, such battlefields as they would find suitable (are to be secured). That which is even, splendidly firm, free from mounds and pits made by wheels and foot-prints of beasts, not offering obstructions to the axle, free from trees, plants, creepers and trunks of trees, not wet, and free from pits, ant-hills, sand, and thorns is the ground for chariots. For elephants, horses and men, even or uneven grounds are good, either for war or for camp. That which contains small stones, trees and pits that can be jumped over and which is almost free from thorns is the ground for horses. That which contains big stones, dry or green trees and ant-hills is the ground for the infantry. That which is uneven with assailable hills and valleys, which has trees that can be pulled down and plants that can be torn, and which is full of muddy soil free from thorns is the ground for elephants. That which is free from thorns, not very uneven, but very expansive, is an excellent ground for the infantry. That which is doubly expansive, free from mud, water and roots of trees and which is devoid of piercing gravel is an excellent ground for horses. 





That which possesses dust, muddy soil, water, grass and weeds, and which is free from thorns (known as dog's teeth) and obstructions from the branches of big trees is an excellent ground for elephants. That which contains lakes, which is free from mounds and wet lands, and which affords space for turning is an excellent ground for chariots. Positions suitable for all the constituents of the army have been treated of. This explains the nature of the ground which is fit for the camp or battle of all kinds of the army. Concentration on occupied positions, in camps and forests; holding the ropes (of beasts and other things) while crossing the rivers or when the wind is blowing hard; destruction or protection of the commissariat and of troops arriving afresh; supervision of the discipline of the army; lengthening the line of the army; protecting the sides of the army; first attack; dispersion (of the enemy's army); trampling it down; defense; seizing; letting it out; causing the army to take a different direction; carrying the treasury and the princes; falling against the rear of the enemy; chasing the timid; pursuit; and concentration--these constitute the work of horses. 





Marching in the front; preparing the roads, camping grounds and path for bringing water; protecting the sides; firm standing, fording and entering into water while crossing pools of water and ascending from them; forced entrance into impregnable places; setting or quenching the fire; the subjugation of one of the four constituents of the army; gathering the dispersed army; breaking a compact army; protection against dangers; trampling down (the enemy's army); frightening and driving it; magnificence; seizing; abandoning; destruction of walls, gates and towers; and carrying the treasury--these constitute the work of elephants. Protection of the army; repelling the attack made by all the four constituents of the enemy's army; seizing and abandoning (positions) during the time of battle; gathering a dispersed army; breaking the compact array of the enemy's army; frightening it; magnificence; and fearful noise--these constitute the work of chariots. Always carrying the weapons to all places; and fighting--these constitute the work of the infantry. The examination of camps, roads, bridges, wells and rivers; carrying the machines, weapons, amours, instruments and provisions; carrying away the men that are knocked down, along with their weapons and amours---these constitute the work of free laborers. The king who has a small number of horses may combine bulls with horses; likewise when he is deficient in elephants, he may fill up the centre of his army with mules, camels and carts.





 Having fortified a camp at the distance of five hundred bows he should begin to fight. Having detached the flower of the army and kept it on a favorable position not visible (to the enemy), the commander-in-chief and the leader should array the rest of the army. The infantry should be arrayed such that the space between any two men; cavalry with three; chariots with fourand elephants with twice or thrice as much space (as between any two chariots). With such an array free to move and having no confusion, one should fight. A bow means five. Archers should be stationed at the distance of five bows (from one line to another); the cavalry at the distance of three bows; and chariots or elephants at the distance of five bows. The intervening space between wings, flanks and front of the army should be five bows. There must be three men to oppose a horse; fifteen men or five horses to oppose a chariot or an elephant; and as many (fifteen) servants for a horse, a chariot and an elephant should be maintained. Three groups of three chariots each should be stationed in front; the same number on the two flanks and the two wings.





 Thus, in an array of chariots, the number of chariots amounts to forty-five, two hundred and twenty-five horses, six hundred and seventy-five men, and as many servants to attend upon the horses, chariots and elephants--this is called an even array of troops. The number of chariots in this array (of three groups of three chariots each) may be increased by two and two till the increased number amounts to twenty-one. Thus, this array of odd numbers of chariots gives rise to ten odd varieties. Thus the surplus of the army may therefore be distributed in the above manner. Two-thirds of the (surplus) chariots may be added to the flanks and the wings, the rest being put in front. Thus the added surplus of chariots should be one-third less (than the number added to the flanks and wings). This explains the distribution of surplus elephants and horses. As many horses, chariots, and elephants may be added as occasion no confusion in fighting. Excess of the army is called surplus); deficiency in infantry is called absence of surplus; excess of any one of the four constituents of the army is akin to surplus; excess of traitors is far from surplus; in accordance with one's own resources, one should increase one's army from four to eight times the excess of the enemy's army or the deficiency in the enemy's infantry. 



The array of elephants is explained by the array of chariots. An array of elephants, chariots, and horses mixed together may also be made: at the extremities of the circle (array), elephants; and on the flanks, horses and principal chariots. The array in which the front is occupied by elephants, the flanks by chariots, and the wings by horses is an array which can break the centre of the enemy's army; the reverse of this can harass the extremities of the enemy's army. An array of elephants may also be made: the front by such elephants as are trained for war; the flanks by such as are trained for riding; and the wings by rogue elephants. In an array of horses, the front by horses with mail amour; and the flanks and wings by horses without amour. In an array of infantry, men dressed in mail amour in front, archers in the rear, and men without amour on the wings; or horses on the wings, elephants on the flanks, and chariots in front; other changes may also be made so as to oppose the enemy's army successfully.





 The best army is that which consists of strong infantry and of such elephants and horses as are noted for their breed, birth, strength, youth, and vitality, capacity to run even in old age, fury, skill, firmness, magnanimity, obedience, and good habits. One-third of the best of infantry, cavalry and elephants should be kept in front; two-thirds on both the flanks and wings; the array of the army according to the strength of its constituents is in the direct order; that which is arrayed mixing one-third of strong and weak troops is in the reverse order. Thus, one should know all the varieties of arraying the array. Having stationed the weak troops at the extremities, one would be liable to the force of the enemy's onslaught. Having stationed the flower of the army in front, one should make the wings equally strong. One-third of the best in the rear and weak troops in the centre--this array are able to resist the enemy; having made an array, he should strike the enemy with one or two of the divisions on the wings, flanks, and front, and capture the enemy by means of the rest of the troops.





 When the enemy's force is weak, with few horses and elephants, and is contaminated with the intrigue of treacherous ministers, the conqueror should strike it with most of his best troops. He should increase the numerical strength of that constituent of the army which is physically weak. He should array his troops on that side on which the enemy is weak or from which danger is apprehended. Running against; running round; running beyond; running back; disturbing the enemy's halt; gathering the troops; curving, circling, miscellaneous operations; removal of the rear; pursuit of the line from the front, flanks and rear; protection of the broken army; and falling upon the broken army--these are the forms of waging war with horses. The same varieties with the exception of (what is called) miscellaneous operations; the destruction of the four constituents of the army, either single or combined; the dispersion of the flanks, wings and front trampling down; and attacking the army when it is asleep--these are the varieties of waging war with elephants. The same varieties with the exception of disturbing the enemy's halt; running against; running back; and fighting from where it stands on its own ground--these are the varieties of waging war with chariots. Striking in all places and at all times and striking by surprise are varieties of waging war with infantry. In this way, he should make odd or even arrays, keeping the strength of the four constituents of the army equal. Having gone to a distance of 200 bows, the king should take his position together with the reserve of his army; and without a reserve, he should never attempt to fight, for it is by the reserved force that dispersed troops are collected together. 



Wings and front, capable to turn (against an enemy is what is called) a snake-like array; the two wings, the two flanks, the front and the reserve (form an array) according to the school. The principal forms of the array of the army, such as that like a staff, like a snake, like a circle, and in detached order, are varieties of the above two forms of the array consisting of wings, flanks and front. Stationing the army so as to stand abreast is called a staff-like array. Stationing the army in a line so that one may follow the other is called a snake-like array. Stationing the army so as to face all the directions is called a circle-like array. Detached arrangement of the army into small bodies so as to enable each to act for itself is termed an array in detached order. That which is of equal strength on its wings, flanks and front, is a staff-like array. The same array is called breaking the enemy's array, when its flanks are made to project in front. The same is called firm when its wings and flanks are stretched back. The same is called irresistible when its wings are lengthened. When, having formed the wings, the front is made to bulge out; it is called an eagle-like array. The same four varieties are called "a bow," "the centre of a bow," "a hold," and "a strong hold," when they are arranged in a reverse form. 



That, of which the wings are arrayed like a bow, is called victory.  The same with projected front is called conqueror; that which has its flanks and wings formed like a staff is called big ear; the same with its front made twice as strong as the conqueror, is called vast victory; that which has its wings stretched forward is called face of the army; and the same is called face of the fish when it is arrayed in the reverse form. The staff-like array in which one (constituent of the army) is made to stand behind the other is called a pin-like array. When this array consists of two such lines, it is called an aggregate; and when of four lines, it is called an invincible array--these are the varieties of the staff-like array. The snake-like array in which the wings, flanks and front are of unequal depth is called serpentine movement. When it consists of two lines in front and has its wings arranged as in the staff-like array, it is called a cart-like array; the reverse of this is called a crocodile-like array; the cart-like array which consists of elephants, horses and chariots is called cart --these are the varieties of the snake-like array. The circle-like array in which the distinction of wings, flanks and front is lost is called facing all directions, or all auspicious, one of eight divisions, or victory--these are the varieties of the circle-like array. 





That, of which the wings, flanks and front are stationed apart is called an array in detached order; when five divisions of the army are arranged in detached order, it is called diamond, or alligator; when four divisions, it is called park, or crow's foot; when three divisions, it is called half-moon,--these are the varieties of the array in detached-order. The array in which chariots form the front, elephants the wings, and horses the rear, is called auspicious. The array in which infantry, cavalry, chariots and elephants stand one behind the other is called immovable. The array in which elephants, horses, chariot and infantry stand in order one behind the other is called invincible. Of these, the conqueror should assail the breaking of the enemies' army by means of the firm; firm by means of the irresistible; eagle-like array by means of an array like a bow; a hold by means of a strong-hold; victory by means of conqueror; big ear by means of vast victorycart by means of all auspicious. Of infantry, cavalry, chariots and elephants, he should strike the first-mentioned with that which is subsequently mentioned; and a small constituent of the army with a big one. For every ten members of each of the constituents of the army, there must be one commander, called commander; ten commanders under a general; ten generals under a leader. The constituents of the array of the army should be called after the names of trumpet sounds, flags and ensigns. 



Achievement of success in arranging the constituents of the army, in gathering the forces, in camping, in marching, in turning back, in making onslaughts, and in the array of equal strength depends upon the place and time of action. By the display of the army, by secret contrivances, by fiery spies employed to strike the enemy engaged otherwise, by witch-craft, by proclaiming the conqueror's association with gods, by carts, by the ornaments of elephants; By inciting traitors, by herds of cattle, by setting fire to the camp, by destroying the wings and the rear of the enemy's army, by sowing the seeds of dissension through the agency of men under the guise of servants; Or by telling the enemy that his fort was burnt, stormed, or that some one of his family, or an enemy or a wild chief rose in rebellion--by these and other means the conqueror should cause excitement to the enemy. The arrow shot by an archer may or may not kill a single man; but skilful intrigue devised by wise men can kill even those who are in the womb. By this means I have crushed, destroyed, mangled and decapitated many an army.
Edited by Meself - 9 years ago