Originally posted by: Mr.KaminA
A Item song where Salman didn't even touch whoever he is dancing in vulgar way is offensive, while SRK doing full on love making scenes is CLASS 😆
Didnt i said, read the article first.
alright i'll copy paste a bit.
'Now there was another chartbuster "Munni Badnam hui" in the same year, and in the lyrics of song, the girl herself professes, that she is nothing but an "item" for men's pleasure. Another song from this amazing movie series "Dabang", there was" fevicol se" in 2012. Going below all the standards of objectification, the woman became a "Tanduri murgi", "Namkin Butter" and "Angur ki daughter"; i.e. chicken, butter etc.
...Analyzing these songs closely, there are few other more troublesome notions hidden in these songs. All of them are "Item songs" which do not have any connection to the story of the movie, and they are just like that in the movie, for ensuring a chartbuster from the movie's songs. Now the important point is that most of the item songs are sexually suggestive, and the lead actress is not included, and the hero of the movie is hardly excluded. The women in these songs are "Item girls" who are just in the song for being a sex object to entertain the men and their fantasies. And the reason that probably most of the public easily accepts these songs is that this is not new or disturbing for our patriarchal biased society and it's thoughts about women- Women are either good or bad. Good women stay in their lines', under male protection, wearing clothes which are not provocative', and such women deserve to be respected by everyone. However, when it comes to bad women', which includes women who do not confine their personalities in the confined boundaries of "appropriate behavior" deserve to be s**t shamed, and used as per men's wishes. However in these item songs, sexual pleasure is for men, not for women. They become really a sex doll, who can be used for men's pleasure but like a non living object they cannot have any, and it is clear by the lyrics from the lyrics of these songs.'
54