The word "culture" is commonly defined as "a way of life." More specifically, it is the way of life of a particular society at a particular time and place.[ii] Some say that Western influences have corrupted South Asian culture to such an extent that it is on the brink of extinction. I strongly disagree with this statement!
South Asian culture has always evolved throughout the ages. Our lifestyles today are definitely not the same as the lifestyle of a Neanderthal. For the most part, it is fair to say that we have progressed a great deal technologically. The progress has been via a combination of internal and external influences.
Point to be noted: "progressing" is not Westernization.
In my opinion, "loss of culture" is a faulty way of describing this evolution of the South Asian way of life.
From the time of the Aryan "invasion" of 1500 BCE to the IT revolution of modern times, the subcontinent has gone through numerous changes. Yet, we have always preserved the innate goodness in our ancient civilizations.
The Aryans (Greeks, Persians and Romans) gave us Holy Scriptures in the form of the four Vedas, which are pivotal to Hindu tradition. A series of invasions from the north, including the most long lasting one by Central Asian ruler and Mughal dynasty founder Zahir-ud-din Mohammad Babar, brought Islam into our country. The Mughals also brought with them exquisite art and architecture – who can forget the Taj Mahal – one of the seven wonders of the world?
It could be argued that the Aryans, Mughals and most recently, the British devastated the cultures of the initial inhabitants of the subcontinent. I disagree.
Shiva or his symbolic phallic pillar, the lingam was worshipped by indigenous people of the Indus Valley civilizations before the Aryan Invasion. It was a symbol of fertility and bounty. Today, there are approx. 220 million Shaivites all over the world.[iii] The Indian Temple Portal gives a list of over 80 major Shiva Temples in India alone![iv] Even the Aryans could not destroy an ancient faith, which was pivotal to the people of that civilization.
The Mughal invasions did not destroy Indian culture or Hinduism. Emperor Akbar was known to have held a conference for all existing religions in India in order to understand them better. Today, 80% of the Indian population comprises of Hindus.[v] Yet, we have also accepted other religions into our culture. The subcontinent has always stressed that we have unity in diversity.
The British came into our country and gave it its legal system. While we can rightly blame the British for exploiting us economically, we cannot deny that they in turn educated our country's freedom fighters and social workers – Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Nehru, Ram Mohan Roy, etc.
Yes BUT educated in which language? English ? Today, there are probably thousands schools in India which have "english" as thier instruction language. WHY? Why not hindi? That's our national language right? Now is this not losing out language which is an important part of our "culture"?
These fighters awakened the Indian consciousness, they appealed to the ancient, deep-rooted bond that connected all of us – irrespective of caste, community or region – as Indians.
Yes exactly thetr "awakaned" us. Indians boycotte dteh foreign goods and even burnt foreign goods. Mahatma gandhi went to england with his goat because he dint want to drink foreign milk.😃
My question is that if our country can accept these external elements and still keep its identity intact, then why is the "Big Bad West" (note the quotation marks) seen as such a threat?
First of all, looking into olden times- the power was NOT in our hands. It was a period of monarchy. Specifically looking at Mughals I personally think they did a lot for India - all those historical monuments, the botanical gardens etc are by them. Indians accepted this change B/C mughals spent the money for serving them EG- The grand Trunk Road and all the rest houses across the roads for rest for people who use to trade(cant remember what those rest houses were called they have a special name). Now looking onto the the other side, Britishers dint serve us that well and we went oppsing them . Actually, they were interested in indian minerals , spices and all the stuff they couldnt get in thier country. And that generation recongnised and acted against it. It's not that we always sat quiet looking at the britisher's cruelities _ we always acted against what we thought was wrong! So now we think embracing west is wrong -- we are going to act against it too!! (right now only three of us😛)
It is common knowledge that prior to "western interference", social evils such as sati, child marriages, purdah system, taboo on widow remarriages, etc. existed in our society on a much larger scale than current times.
Ram Mohan Roy, the founder of the Brahmo Samaj society, took the aid of the British in abolishing the practice of Sati – one of the greatest social evils of our culture where women were burnt alive on their husbands' funeral pyres! That was one of the biggest steps towards women's rights and feminist movements.
The question is, should social evils also be accepted as a part of our culture simply due to the fear of "losing" it? The answer is no. Blindly clinging on to ancient beliefs, when they are detrimental to society, is not the mark of a truly cultured person. Neither does this make you truly South Asian. Discarding such practices is not a loss, but a gain on our part.
Who said it is a part of Indian society? If you are saying that the no. of these social evils are decreased B/C of we adopting western policies..I say NO! It's was because of our indain leaders (nehru, ambedkar etc ) that first time we got the independence to think about ourselves on our own when we got independence. That is when they formed the big granth- constitution making educated decisions to how our country can progress> first time they thought if they will killing people like that (baliz, satiz etc) How is our country going to progress! They learned the importance of word named "women" and "life". (right for life to every children by UN;))
The West brought about awareness and information about different things. ?? Sry, but I have to disagree with this statement. West brought awareness? Insaan ki anhen tab tak nahi khulti jab wo khud na kholna chahe...!! if India is something today then it's because of our citinezs. If you are thinking technology is gift from west i say no... this is something which is shared all over the world... If arbhata discovered zero then western dint print in thier textbooks that ok we got number system from indians.. Even the theory of atom by other scientists was already in our vedas - atom called as parmanu!
Embracing western culture means changing our lifestyles to match the west. If they wear this, we wear the same. if they eat this, we ea tthe same. In other words, you can call it copying!! How are we losing our culture by doing this ? Just for example - Most Indai women wear western clothes and take a while and ask them what is the thing these girls are wearing on thier head above tika (see below):
you know what even I dont know! That is what we call "losing" our culture when living in india, we dont our regional dress, we dont know how to speak our language properly etc. We can spend so much money buying western dresses but when time comes to deteriorating monuments, our government doesnt have funds. EG- the paint in the ajanta caves is deteriorating and to get the same quality paint that was used in earlier times, it costs a lot (Source: Punjab district School Borad Grade 10 history textbook Chapter 1😃)
We improved upon our ideologies, yet retained our individuality. In fact, South Asia is influencing other countries, including the West! The Hare Rama Hare Krishna Foundation and Ramakrishna Mission have centres all over North America and Europe. Buddhism travelled via the Silk Route to the Far East – China, Japan, Thailand and to the South in Sri Lanka.
By that account, one may say that South Asian influence is destroying Western culture and the culture in the Far East! However, this is a flawed method of perception.
There has been a mutual exchange of ideas and innovations between the East and the West. Both have improved alongside each other, yet have kept their own identities intact.
For example, no one will mistake India for a pale imitation of USA or the UK (Canada already fulfils that requirement 😉). One may say that the economic situation is the most obvious difference. But, I'm not talking about differences in GDPs and the poverty line. I'm talking about languages, clothing, technology, industry and different ideologies that have shaped the citizens of our country. (These will be covered in detail by my team mates, MNMS and Mrs.Eishu.SRK) Looking forward to more explanation!😉
It takes more than just western influence to lose a country's culture. History is a witness to that. It takes a night to lose culture and hundred years to get it back because in the darkness we forget what we are and infact lose our own identity!
PS. If you thought this was the end of our arguments, don't worry…this is just the beginning.😛 (MNMS, Mrs.Eishu.SRK and T.)
(Well, wrong thought!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture
[iii]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaivism
[v] Zaehner, R.C. Hinduism.
comment:
p_commentcount