Lajja = Modesty = Women ?? - Page 23

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

For now I am going to disagree you on this, because I do not know what you mean by women are allowed to say and do certain things, but men aren't 😕 Same with "straight people can be harassed by LGBT" 😕

So I do not understand your statement "Instead of equality we are tilting the scales in opposite direction" Equality hasn't been even reached so I do not see how the scale in already getting titled in the opposite direction unless you are willing to elaborate more on your POV.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

@bold: Again you just proved how many people think and assume. Everyone likes to be modest and humble regardless of the gender, how is that even applicable to only girls or women 😕

You did the same what Siddhu did, instead of saying most humans you used most girls or women

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

And the fact that he chose Aashka and delnaz over his self-confessed chahitees Sapna and Urvashi shows that the use of lajja for women was a premeditated thought. 🥱

Edited by scofield - 11 years ago

Originally posted by: scofield

I agree and have time again said that he should have used those words at all. Specially sidhu who we all know has excellent command and vocabulary of the language. It was sidhu's ego on fire that time coz sapna that again questioned him.

Scoefield, I'll get back to you with the your other posts. Here I will say yes it might have been his ego. But when such gender induced statements are used to criticize someone which are filled with judgments, then it shows more about that person's thought process. Again I do not want to dwell more into Siddhu since I won't want the thread to go in that direction. But in such context, when people impose such ideas on a woman, it is technically their thought process or the fact that they want to flow with societal perception on a public platform.

Anyhow it just goes on to prove that everyone ends up losing coming to this mad house of BB where we voyeurs love to dissect every action and thought of theirs.

Originally posted by: scofield

Anyhow it just goes on to prove that everyone ends up losing coming to this mad house of BB where we voyeurs love to dissect every action and thought of theirs.

Bigg boss jahann aap jeet ke bhi haarte hain 

Again it isn't about dissecting any contestant, my topic has been created to discuss way beyond BB or any contestant. If you read my replies, you will see the reason why I had created the topic in the first place.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

Scoefield, I'll get back to you with the your other posts. Here I will say yes it might have been his ego. But when such gender induced statements are used to criticize someone which are filled with judgments, then it shows more about that person's thought process. Again I do not want to dwell more into Siddhu since I won't want the thread to go in that direction. But in such context, when people impose such ideas on a woman, it is technically their thought process or the fact that they want to flow with societal perception on a public platform.

Originally posted by: scofield

No worries my friend. And i agree it might be thought process. But that vent  from an MP on national tv beats that too.All of his hard work went down the drain that moment. You dont need to dwell into sidhu. As is I'm pro-nobody and anti-nobody..They all the same to me.

On another note its funny how we all viewers[incl. me] are somewhat hypocrite in a way. Sometimes we like a contestant coz he's calm and cool but later on he becomes boring or spineless. And the ones who give us masala, what we really want, we call them psychos , deranged and all kinda names..😆

@bold: Not everyone thinks the same. Some were actually proud of him and I am sure after using such aurat ka gahena comment, many ladies and men must have applauded him especially those who do not like the way Sapna is seen in the house. And just cuz someone makes a mistake of using wrong words or for having such thought process doesn't negate any positive or good qualities of a contestant, at least for people like me.

As for the rest, let's not generalize. Not everyone does that. Few people go overboard with name calling. Personally, I will call someone bully or arrogant or cry baby or boring or spineless if he or she is acting like one for my standards and I am sure the same applies to many others. Few names are for fun like mine Sadhu baba or Fevicol aunty or like Cruiser's constipated Niketan. But there are few who loves using messed up and insulting tags. So I wouldn't go that far. I am sure people have their own reasons for liking or disliking a contestant. As for BB most don't like boring contestants, everyone is always in the mood of masala. And I am giving you a serious answer here since we are having a serious discussion 😉
Edited by -Chandramukhi- - 11 years ago

Chandra ji,

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

That makes no sense. If the elder is an ass, I assure you there will no "sharam" or "Lajja" from my side only invectives.