:L I'm getting flashbacks of countless posts now. Honestly, I can not begin to describe the sheer amount of times people have highlighted just how great the show *could* have been, had they focused on the cancer like they should of. It's just plain mockery right now, especially the 'this is the ONLY treatment in the WORLD' that could save Mannu. Bad direction, bad writing, bad dialogue, all it adds up to is a half baked pie of a show.The sometimes dragging, sometimes zooming - giving me a headache :P The whole cancer track - the one single main track of the entire show seems like it's already over when it's just begun, and I blame that on CVs for having such a predictable plot. They really can't get their pacing right at all; it was great to see Manvi and Jeevika finding out about the severity of the cancer quickly, but then the whole Doctor's meeting was skimmed over too quickly.But anyway, the ethics behind it all is quite fascinating. I think it all depends on, in regards to abortion, on where you personally believe life begins. The anti-abortionists would say conception, the liberals would say when the heart starts beating (40 days isn't it?) and then the pro-choice would say at birth. It's murky waters which can be debated over aeons.Abortions were all part of my Ethics course which I did when I was fifteen, and to get a class full of fifteen year old boys and girls to shut up, pay attention, and visibly be shaken by what they learn, it takes something big. I remember watching a vid about the suction-aspiration abortion method, and the way that they just pull off the limbs of the foetus, it's horrible to think about. Again, this revolves around whether or not the foetus actually feels pain. The partial-birth one, some kid in my class ended up researching it and mentioning it, we were horrified. Jamming scissors into the base of the neck? It makes you shudder.:L Controversy.
I honestly couldn't agree more. It's very unfortunate actually. The CVs had evidently planned Manvi's cancer from the very beginning of the show, so you would think that they'd have the time to do plenty of research to get them educated on the issue. The problem with the CVs is that they don't know who and what to prioritize. I'm not going to divulge into the discussion of other fangroups, but being ignorant of the main conflict of the show for the sake of fan requests? Why? My concern is that the CVs can't execute medically factual writing and consistency. The ONLY TREATMENT in the world remark was a total facepalm 😳 Erm, what ever happened to stem cell transportation and immunotherapy? There are quite a few targeted therapies, hormonal therapies and angiogenesis inhibitors around. The 99% success rate talk was a joke. Basically, what the doctor said was that if the cancer patient has a sibling who is willing to donate his/her bone marrow, the patient is guaranteed survival. For real? Why are the writers making it sound so easy? Most of the time, the only dialogue I genuinely enjoy comes from the sisters; the dialogue that tries to suffice Manvi's condition has no logic whatsoever. As for the dragging, oh brother! Dr. Manan revealed the cancer to Beeji in February; it's almost September and we've just reached the BEGINNING of the pivotal point. The pacing has been atrocious (excuse my harshness), to say the least. The cancer was shoved under the carpet during the Maya track, Virat's realization, after Mumbai (the Mumbai track itself was a waste) and then the 7 day track. Together, all of that accumulates to at least 3 months. The constant inconsistencies of this show don't help either. I predicted the BMT track as well, but right now, I'm just intrigued to how everything will play out. I fear for medical science though. The bias in me blatantly knows that I watch for the sisters, but the writing is very crucial; there's no way I can appreciate the show in its entirety if the writing is so shabby. I was disappointed with the build-up to the revelation of the reports to Jeevika along with the revelation itself sadly. It really bothers me how the cancer is fizzled out and then emphasized upon, for the sake of the writers' conveniences.
I won't divulge into the ethics of the abortion issue as we'll be here for hours, but I wholeheartedly agree. More than anything, it's a personal belief (which may be based on religion, science and poltics). I really wish some people could keep personal bias aside for this issue because agreeing/disagreeing about Jeevika's decision on the basis of Jeevika/Manvi/Viren/Virat being your favourite character/jodi/actor/actress wouldn't be ethical IMO.
15?! Wow! That must have been a lot of information to digest at such a tender age! I took an ethics (mainly based around medicine) course during my first year of university followed by a few oncology courses. Personally, I got exposed to many viewpoints, and I was definitely seeing the world from different pairs of eyes. Oh goodness, it's such a harsh thing to think about right? Fetuses feeling pain is another issue with contrasting perspectives. There's no confirmed answer, but most studies are saying that they can feel pain after certain growth. The amount of growth needed is debated on frequently though.
comment:
p_commentcount