Originally posted by: Doodle
Ritz the thing is it is not my opinion here .. I am just stating a FACT ... in our society when a boy purposefully/ accidentally does that then they are declared married ... AND THIS IS NO SYMBOLIC ...
Symbolic mein there will be NO direct Sindoor filling but it will be INDIRECT ...
and as far as putting sindoor and tying MS is a symbol of a married woman is concerned yeah you don't need a wedding but the thing here is "Witness" ...where there was NONE.. hence issue can be raised by the family as there was no "PRIEST" at the temple also ... so it can be called as a "Sham"
But I don't care wedding hua ki nehin .. all I feel is the "contract" should be out in the open just so that the PH an teach the "Moral Lessons" behind that act.
comment:
p_commentcount