Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 4th Oct 2025 - WKV
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 4, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
SAB KUCH HOGAYA 4.10
GALATI HOGAYI 5.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 5, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 5th Oct 2025 - WKV
Truth, lies and delusions of Geetanjali - A tribute from Gen4 pankhas
Ranbir and Deepika in the airport shuttle.
Twinkle taking dig at Alia?
What a joke this is!
Twinkle Khanna looks horrible! What did she do to her face?
Katrina Kaif copied Madonna, Mariah having a baby at 42
♧Bigg Boss 9 Discussion Thread♧
Veteran Actress Sandhya Shantaram Passes Away
We use so many tags to name Gulaal-Kesar when there is actually NONE!
She slapped him like a mother...sister...etc etc. Does she say that anywhere? NO! I don't understand why we have to label their relationship when the whole point of their relationship is that there is NO NAME! That is why when Kesar asked 'What is the relationship between me and Gulaal?', no-one could answer because there is NO answer yet we have to put label them. Why?? What's the need?Not every relationship can have a name. I just feel that everytime we use a tag name, we just belittle the unique relationship they share.She is distraught because she has seen him as a child, not because she saw him as a son or brother or whatever you wish to call it. She's upset because she has seen him as KESUDA!! If she really saw him as her son or brother, she wouldn't have married him no matter how noble her thoughts were.
Completely agree with you reemzzz...thats what i dont understand either.. why we have to give the name to their relationship espiclly bro or son!! this is not good and appropriate.. we have seen what happen in their life...their relationship was just a friendship.. and i totally understand and agree with reemz that if gulaal considered him son or bro, she would never have done deervatooo... ITS VERY CLEAR THAT THEY NEVER SHARE ANY SIBLING RELATIONSHIP NOR MOTHER SON!!! it was always FRIENSHIP... and now they will share a new and beautiful relationhsip of husband and wife...We use so many tags to name Gulaal-Kesar when there is actually NONE!
She slapped him like a mother...sister...etc etc. Does she say that anywhere? NO! I don't understand why we have to label their relationship when the whole point of their relationship is that there is NO NAME! That is why when Kesar asked 'What is the relationship between me and Gulaal?', no-one could answer because there is NO answer yet we have to put label them. Why?? What's the need?Not every relationship can have a name. I just feel that everytime we use a tag name, we just belittle the unique relationship they share.She is distraught because she has seen him as a child, not because she saw him as a son or brother or whatever you wish to call it. She's upset because she has seen him as KESUDA!! If she really saw him as her son or brother, she wouldn't have married him no matter how noble her thoughts were.
We use so many tags to name Gulaal-Kesar when there is actually NONE!
She slapped him like a mother...sister...etc etc. Does she say that anywhere? NO! I don't understand why we have to label their relationship when the whole point of their relationship is that there is NO NAME! That is why when Kesar asked 'What is the relationship between me and Gulaal?', no-one could answer because there is NO answer yet we have to put label them. Why?? What's the need?Not every relationship can have a name. I just feel that everytime we use a tag name, we just belittle the unique relationship they share.She is distraught because she has seen him as a child, not because she saw him as a son or brother or whatever you wish to call it. She's upset because she has seen him as KESUDA!! If she really saw him as her son or brother, she wouldn't have married him no matter how noble her thoughts were.
We use so many tags to name Gulaal-Kesar when there is actually NONE!
She slapped him like a mother...sister...etc etc. Does she say that anywhere? NO! I don't understand why we have to label their relationship when the whole point of their relationship is that there is NO NAME! That is why when Kesar asked 'What is the relationship between me and Gulaal?', no-one could answer because there is NO answer yet we have to put label them. Why?? What's the need?Not every relationship can have a name. I just feel that everytime we use a tag name, we just belittle the unique relationship they share.She is distraught because she has seen him as a child, not because she saw him as a son or brother or whatever you wish to call it. She's upset because she has seen him as KESUDA!! If she really saw him as her son or brother, she wouldn't have married him no matter how noble her thoughts were.
I completely agree she never took him as son or brother. It is a relation which had no name.We use so many tags to name Gulaal-Kesar when there is actually NONE!
She slapped him like a mother...sister...etc etc. Does she say that anywhere? NO! I don't understand why we have to label their relationship when the whole point of their relationship is that there is NO NAME! That is why when Kesar asked 'What is the relationship between me and Gulaal?', no-one could answer because there is NO answer yet we have to put label them. Why?? What's the need?Not every relationship can have a name. I just feel that everytime we use a tag name, we just belittle the unique relationship they share.She is distraught because she has seen him as a child, not because she saw him as a son or brother or whatever you wish to call it. She's upset because she has seen him as KESUDA!! If she really saw him as her son or brother, she wouldn't have married him no matter how noble her thoughts were.