Originally posted by: bollywoodcrazed
I haven't seen the episode yet just read the update, Savita has shown how selfish she is. Her son came and admitted he was wrong but that wasn't enough for her, instead she wants Manav to prove his love by leaving his wife and be able to control him again. Savita should be ashamed of herself to do this to her son, she knows Manav loves her and he even admitted he was wrong but instead of embracing her son she accuses him of doing this out of pity and won't accept his love for her until he chooses her over his wife.
Originally posted by: Jaishankar
First of all Manav saying "MY mom does not love me" is the same thing he is repeating coming to conclusions without thinking for once just like "I am not eliglbe part" which started this mess.
Archu seems to understand Savita more than Manav.She without seeeing Savita realizes that what Savita told was not from her heart.First when Damo told Manav about Savita well Manav gave priority to what Madhuri ???? than his mom..Savita was right he just came to see her coz he heard she was sick and when Damo said in fact kind of said Manav please tum ,Manav said I will come and fall in my mom;s feet.I will ask Manav where is ur thinking ? Have u dont have a common sense to priortrize between which is imp ,is Madhuri for u more imp than ur mom;s health which u can easily sideline for later.This postponement and negligence of Manav towards his mom has made this mess he is in.When Savita was saying those words cant even see on her face she is not alright she is sick and what she is talking is not coming from her heart.Anyone seeing her would clearly think first that something is wrong with this old women insetead of going and crying to ur wife and make her feel more gulity saying "My mom does not love me any more."
This stupidity of Manav seems to be going on in an effort to now bring Archu to limelight.If thats the case then plzzz at least do that she can handle Savita better than these 2 male idiots .The father son combo sucks big time and are totally hopeless.IT seems in Father son case only Mother and daughter in law can do something both males in family of D's are hopeless.
I am never saying is Manav is wrong he is good son,good husband but his way of dealing things have lead him to the current situation.
Well by using the ignorant approach Manav just dug grave for himself.Had he thought before he would not be facing this situation.Savita already had hatred to Archu and this approach just pushed savita to a limit where I think she is in a state where she does not know what she wants.I am not sure even if Manav comes back she is going to be happy.
What Savita needs right now is proper medical care at all cost with proper attention and most imp love.There is no point with Manav coming back as a lifeless soul without Archu ,its not going to cure Savita.
I think as people say the older one get the more childish the mind becomes .Savita with her age has this mental block so nothing normal is going to help.
Alas Manav had thought about consequences before rather than showing stubbornness at that point of time.
Now Manav needs to take the initiative and just go to D's along with Archu just cut all the samaj Seva for K's and tell ARchu as well to just focus on sasural and then be with Savita. Savita is a mentally sick child at the moment.You dont leave a mentally sick child and go away instead you stand by th child and keep trying and pray and hope things get well soon.Similarly I think Arman needs to stay with Savita ,Savita would not accept it initially but they need to show persistence and give in return love and care for Savita hatred,this will cure Savita slowly. We dont abandon a mentally retarded child and I think Arman should be with Savita for her sake and for Sachu sake.
And I am sick and tired of all the blame which Arman get , especially Archana for being the cause of Savita's problems. As though Savita has been very fair in her dealings always. Her actions are "practical" but Arman's actions are "mahaan"? When they get "practical", then they become selfish!π
Just read this interesting conversation...main points are well argued from both the sidesπ...some contribution to a side note.
Karanjikars' two indulgences are wretched; Manjusha's eternal impunity and their partial respect (read indifference/apathy) to Manav's place.π‘ They were more deferential to even a betrothed Jaywant, let alone married and rich Satish or Dharmesh. This smacks of hypocrisy and ingratitude
That said, Savita's grudge on Manav on the matter is commonplace but not condonable. She may be dismayed. But does it justify, even part thereof, her total renunciation of Manav? It appears, hey off with you unless you fight it out with them, you MY rooster. It's Manav's wish to punish or forgive them. Why should she hold-up this as collateral blockade to her relationship with her son? If Manav chooses to move forward on those relationships it's not her place to begrudge the forgiven. She may yet caution or remind him the drawback or if she chooses, she herself may be unforgiving but that can not translate into march out orders to a 'victim' for not 'fighting' his cause. As for her implied expectation from Archana the 'baggage' to tear off her relationship to her living parents, less said the better. If we remember, Manav's benevolent interaction with his own Sister's household is equally balanced. Besides, he does not propose to compromise or barter his duties or affections to his parent with new relations. No way, for all inferences from circumstantial conflicts, they do not point to base fabric of his disposition.
That said. Probably they are set for a generous and pious welcome by Aai. In the end, she herself goes collecting her children back to her nest. With a command, 'Ghar chalo'.π€ Karanjikars go to your home.π
comment:
p_commentcount