Public voting Vs Judges decision

I think it would've been a good idea if the judges would've made the final decision but you guys must have notices that the mentors where never happy and satisfied with the judges decsion. I think the only mentor who never had any problme with the judge's decsion was ID............HR always siad "mere contestent ke sath na insafi howee...... he kept saying Aishwarya, Aishwarya ..............AS always complain about his contestent Vishvas.....J/L kept saying abijeet/Ujjani....................Mentors always complian that "hamare contestent ke sath na insafi howi magar public es show ko ghawr se dekh raha hai aur hamien yaqeen hai that they will make the right decsion". I think mentors were also in favor of public voting, dont they.................I think each mentor used the "Na insafi" wrod more than 100 times. Persoally i think that it would have been a good idea if the judges would've been made the finaldecsion not the public but again if the finalists are goning to be entitlted "Indai's best signer" then there has to be public voiting.......................I do agree that some times public can make wrong decsion, some times they like a contestent not because that he/she is a realy good singer but just because that he/she belongs from the same region as they do, they speak the same langagaue as they do, the contestent is good looking or the contestent is a nice human bing and so and so.................Any comments