do you think bollywood movies are - Page 6

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

DDLJ,-1995

HAHK- 1994,

QSQT - 1988

Sholay- 1975

YKB - 1973

well, from 73 to 95 , only 5 movies fit the bill according to you,

and we have OSO releasing only 2 yrs back,

so i guess everything's the same in this regard😆

Originally posted by: clodpolish

well, from 73 to 95 , only 5 movies fit the bill according to you,

and we have OSO releasing only 2 yrs back,

so i guess everything's the same in this regard😆

These were just examples. I am a fan of KJo and his movies. For me Bollywood is lacking the feel good factor - the commercial cinema like Welcome and Singh is king you mentioned is of mindless variety - not feel good variety.

But what makes me feel good does not necessarily make everyone else feel good, nor does everyone want to feel good.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

These were just examples. I am a fan of KJo and his movies. For me Bollywood is lacking the feel good factor - the commercial cinema like Welcome and Singh is king you mentioned is of mindless variety - not feel good variety.

ya, i also don't like them ! Even if mindless, i like humour which is mindful, but here the humour is also mindless😆

But what makes me feel good does not necessarily make everyone else feel good, nor does everyone want to feel good.

Originally posted by: clodpolish

They are the ones who pull audiences including people like you(i am not being offensive, or trying to say what you do is wrong, etc , ....just stating a fact😊) , but there is a vast section of audience which comes to theatres based on word of mouth appreciation also. Such people decide whether the film is a hit or not ! Otherwise all films of these actors would be super hits !

agreee and the people from whome these vast audience take reviews are people like me who go and watch first day first show. and therefore i saud they pull the audience to movies not make a movie hit.
a movie is a hit only if it is nice.

Originally posted by: sandya_rao7

agreee and the people from whome these vast audience take reviews are people like me who go and watch first day first show. and therefore i saud they pull the audience to movies not make a movie hit.
a movie is a hit only if it is nice.

cool !😃

If a film run 100days in a theater it not means its a Good film!! 😊I think we can call its a audience film...

Originally posted by: sandya_rao7

 

wht i mean is...........  the basic themes are the same. earlier also there was a heroine hero and a villian with a love story and all that now also its the same concepts only the presentation has changed as people have also changed. well i surely go to watch a movie of my favs. so in that way who is there in the movies does matter to me.

 

Edited by souro - 15 years ago

Originally posted by: souro

<FONT color=#990099>@Sandya: I find this very strange. You're contradicting your own point just because the person responding made a mistake in understanding orwasknowinglyagreeing with you. 😕</FONT>

<FONT color=#990099>You were both basically saying the same thing that actors are not that important all the time. (see the parts marked in red). But when s/he agreed with you, you changed your stance. (part in blue). Extremely strange. 😕</FONT>

i am saying that who the stars are not that imp but they are imp to a certain extent. but he/she said that its not at all imp.