why make a serial on Silsila story...??? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

21

Views

1.4k

Users

8

Likes

29

Frequent Posters

Mystique.Kishi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#11
OFCOURSE I am so much in agreement with you guys!!! I mean how dare she! Nandidni! Who is she? She is just a mere WOMAN! How can she have this much attitude! More importantly, how dare she be so short tempered! How dare she has any temper at all! How can ANY WOMAN have a short temper! I mean, women are supposed to be full of patience and kindness and all good things. A woman must possess every virtue that exists on planet earth and still strive for more perfection. Because no woman can ever be perfect enough. She should take lessons on how to be a proper meek docile woman from Vijaya. She should learn from Vijaya on how to be quiet and suppress your emotions and drink your tears. She should learn from Vijaya on how to never raise your voice against any male and always respect the pati parmeshvar. Even when the said pati parmeshvar has refused her all the rights due to a wife. She should learn from Vijaya that a woman should accept whatever is in her naseeb and should never fight for her love or anything really. She should learn from Vijaya on how to pine after a man silently. She should learn from Vijaya that marrying a man who does not love you for the sake of honour is okay and right after the death of the man who you were in love with. She should learn from Vijaya on how to not have the guts to raise her child alone and say no to marriage with a man who is marrying her out of pity. Vijaya is the perfect Indian woman. She is the bloody EPITOME of womanhood. And any woman who does not conform to the sweet and docile sacrifical lamb stereotype in Indian TV is characterless to the utmost.
The reason Indian TV lacks in quality content is because its viewers deserve shit like Sasural Simar ka. The Indian audience believes that a short tempered woman is unattractive to men and that any woman with a short temper does not deserve to be loved at all. People are horrified that men actually might find a woman with a mind and a voice more attractive. Hawww!!!!! It is blasphemy if a woman has attitude.

OH, But guess what?! A male lead can be as rude and arrogant and short tempered as he wants. Because ahem, he is a man. And a MAN WITH A TEMPER IS HOT!

I personally hope this show gives a middle finger to all the hypocrites that exist here. Women who are effing enemies of other women. In an extra marital affair the only person at fault is the man or woman who is cheating on the spouse. The third party is not forcing the person to cheat on their spouse!
Mystique.Kishi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: dasa06


rightly put..also she is not so beautiful too...

Well done lady! I am proud of you. A woman's worth is obviously measured by her beauty and her beauty alone. You should try your hand at writing articles for the females so that ugly women could know their place in society and not disrupt the lives of beautiful women.👏
rayjain thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: Mystique.Kishi


Well done lady! I am proud of you. A woman's worth is obviously measured by her beauty and her beauty alone. You should try your hand at writing articles for the females so that ugly women could know their place in society and not disrupt the lives of beautiful women.👏



Okay one thing is confirmed that you are an idiot for interpreting the whole thing this way...

I never wrote that she is ugly and hence should be undesirable... her arrogance makes her undesirable for me... and the fact that she is cheating Vijaya along with Akshay... that makes both undesirable... but an IDIOT like you will not understand 👏
Mystique.Kishi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: rayjain



Okay one thing is confirmed that you are an idiot for interpreting the whole thing this way...

I never wrote that she is ugly and hence should be undesirable... her arrogance makes her undesirable for me... and the fact that she is cheating Vijaya along with Akshay... that makes both undesirable... but an IDIOT like you will not understand 👏

Of course I might be the one with the reading problem . Correct me if I am wrong but I specifically read you wondering why would they love a woman with an attitude even when she is and I quote "not so beautiful" . Newsflash. Love does not work that way. But I don't expect someone like you to understand.
Notice how i did not get personal and called you names even when you personally slandered me. That is called respecting the forum rules. Which you broke by namecalling me. Did that make you feel good? Did you feel more validated by attacking me? Do you believe calling me an idiot has lent more credibility to your medieval mentality that believes that women should not have"attitude"?
rayjain thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: Mystique.Kishi


Of course I might be the one with the reading problem . Correct me if I am wrong but I specifically read you wondering why would they love a woman with an attitude even when she is and I quote "not so beautiful" . Newsflash. Love does not work that way. But I don't expect someone like you to understand.
Notice how i did not get personal and called you names even when you personally slandered me. That is called respecting the forum rules. Which you broke by namecalling me. Did that make you feel good? Did you feel more validated by attacking me? Do you believe calling me an idiot has lent more credibility to your medieval mentality that believes that women should not have"attitude"?



yes u have reading probs... at least u know that much about urself... and do not talk about forum rules coz how much respect u have for other people's opinion is evident... u will not decide what should or should not be desirable for me or anyone else...

yes I find arrogance undesirable in both men and women... and yes your nonsensical critical babbling makes u an idiot...
Mystique.Kishi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: rayjain



yes u have reading probs... at least u know that much about urself... and do not talk about forum rules coz how much respect u have for other people's opinion is evident... u will not decide what should or should not be desirable for me or anyone else...

yes I find arrogance undesirable in both men and women... and yes your nonsensical critical babbling makes u an idiot...

In a forum a person can disagree with you. That is what forums are for. If you don't want critical babbling, a forum is not the place to be. ATs are created in a forum where people can go so that they won't have to deal with critical babbling.
You could have countered me with your own points. You could have been sarcastic like me. You could have even poked at fun at me. Instead you chose to be downright insulting and call me names. That was a lame comeback. Wit should be countered with wit. If you counter wit with curses and name calling, then one comes across as witless.
rayjain thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: Mystique.Kishi


In a forum a person can disagree with you. That is what forums are for. If you don't want critical babbling, a forum is not the place to be. ATs are created in a forum where people can go so that they won't have to deal with critical babbling.
You could have countered me with your own points. You could have been sarcastic like me. You could have even poked at fun at me. Instead you chose to be downright insulting and call me names. That was a lame comeback. Wit should be countered with wit. If you counter wit with curses and name calling, then one comes across as witless.



U will not dicate me how to express my dislike for ur verbiage... in fact, for people like u... ur scarcasm was sexist, silly, and irritating... where people r only commenting on the characterization of a fictional charater, u have turned it into their societal view point... DUSGUSTING...

there was nothing "WITTY" about ur post... if u think u were being "witty" ... again u r an IDIOT... as mentioned above, it was disgustingly sexist... hence, the reaction...

btw, calling someone an idiot is not name calling... I simply means u have no brains... and now back off... I do not like to interact with people who r critical of other people's views and that too on an insignificant series, but cannot handle "counter" criticism.
vraizada thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#18
Not a progressive idea for today's time. Single Father, mothers through surrogacy and gay partners becoming parents is becoming common ...so having a kid out off wedlock may not raise that many questions anymore. Though I personally don't know how I would react if any such thing happens with my kids but good to learn and adapt to the current times. My old parents living under the same roof with a girl who is not their grand Daughter inlaw yet. Their Mantra...keep mouth shut and move on with time...
Mystique.Kishi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: rayjain



U will not dicate me how to express my dislike for ur verbiage... in fact, for people like u... ur scarcasm was sexist, silly, and irritating... where people r only commenting on the characterization of a fictional charater, u have turned it into their societal view point... DUSGUSTING...

there was nothing "WITTY" about ur post... if u think u were being "witty" ... again u r an IDIOT... as mentioned above, it was disgustingly sexist... hence, the reaction...

btw, calling someone an idiot is not name calling... I simply means u have no brains... and now back off... I do not like to interact with people who r critical of other people's views and that too on an insignificant series, but cannot handle "counter" criticism.

You might be very right in calling me an idiot. Because I just realized something. My answer, criticism or whatever you want to call it was not towards you at all. It was toward dasa06. Which is definitely not you. I replied to her. So let me ask you this, who the eff are you to reply on her behalf?! Did I say a word to you? Did I criticise YOU? NO I didn't. Then why on earth do you have an itch up your back? When I did not target you in the first place!
Maharaani thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#20
Yeah in today's progressive time if out of wedlock sex is okay, then breaking loveless non existent marriages are also okay. Marriages that are a blunder and do no one any good. That is certainly adaptive to progressive times, if pre -marital sleeping- arounds and keeping some xyz random person's illegitimate kids are . If society approved these things, they won't call kids illegitimate...so if society does not approve one thing , then it does not do the other...intelligent people who do not go with herd realize that society and it's evils are to be eradicated, not followed upon...and one evil is keeping people forcefully bound in loveless marriages...but if this forum is so much doing society society then Bijaya is also unsocial and had her illegitimate things.Today's times call for living life on your own terms.

If Akshaya's parents knew the fact, and still approve, then it is okay, but keeping them in dark for your convenience is CHEATING , like you call hiding the lovers's meeting cheating.

When someone weak and opportunist like Vijaya gets too ready to marry someone who is only having pity on her, then she should be prepared for all future troubles like breaking of marriage or what one calls cheating. The fault is as much hers as of others'.
Edited by Maharaani - 8 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".