Posted:
"An actor is a person who plays a character in a film or play, pretending to portray the person that the writer, has created , which is under the guidance of a director where as , a character specializes in playing a an array of characters , rather than the leading role which an actor may play, although an actor may at time have a higher rate of steady employment depending on the show's success , a character may have frequent breaks in employment" http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_an_actor_and_a_character_performer
Raj is an actor who plays the character Cherry. We can appreciate Raj for his acting as Cherry coz he is putting lots of hard work into it. How well he is performing, giving him feedback to improve but tht doesnt mean we will support Cherry's misdeed as he is played by Raj. We shouldnt support Cherry rather Raj. We saw Zain amazingly played Yuvi. Though none likes Yuvi, yet Zain walked away with lots of appreciations and awards for his amazing performance as Yuvi. Everyone (mostly) liked Zain's performance as Yuvi and appreciated him. Raj does really good as Cherry when he is given chance to mock other characters with his good for nothing dialogue. I personally find it entertaining coz Raj's acting and voice modulation is great.
Having said tht, i dont like Cherry for his cheapness but i do appreciate Raj for his dedication and Raj himself acknowledged how its tough to put into Cherry's shoes and realizing what many women goes thro. We should aporeciate Raj but not Cherry. Coz Cherry is a fictional character which is created to entertain. Many top actors are well recognized for their top performance in negative role tho those roles are hated by one and all.
Raj fans should be happy as his acting gets recognised. He gets focused and discussed. Shouldnt support Cherry blindly as its played by Raj. Raj fans should give feedbacks to CV in order to make the character even more interesting. The more interesting it is, the more appreciations Raj will get. At the end appreciations matters for an actor for which they are willing to play negative roles.
Raj is an actor who plays the character Cherry. We can appreciate Raj for his acting as Cherry coz he is putting lots of hard work into it. How well he is performing, giving him feedback to improve but tht doesnt mean we will support Cherry's misdeed as he is played by Raj. We shouldnt support Cherry rather Raj. We saw Zain amazingly played Yuvi. Though none likes Yuvi, yet Zain walked away with lots of appreciations and awards for his amazing performance as Yuvi. Everyone (mostly) liked Zain's performance as Yuvi and appreciated him. Raj does really good as Cherry when he is given chance to mock other characters with his good for nothing dialogue. I personally find it entertaining coz Raj's acting and voice modulation is great.
Having said tht, i dont like Cherry for his cheapness but i do appreciate Raj for his dedication and Raj himself acknowledged how its tough to put into Cherry's shoes and realizing what many women goes thro. We should aporeciate Raj but not Cherry. Coz Cherry is a fictional character which is created to entertain. Many top actors are well recognized for their top performance in negative role tho those roles are hated by one and all.
Raj fans should be happy as his acting gets recognised. He gets focused and discussed. Shouldnt support Cherry blindly as its played by Raj. Raj fans should give feedbacks to CV in order to make the character even more interesting. The more interesting it is, the more appreciations Raj will get. At the end appreciations matters for an actor for which they are willing to play negative roles.
Anupamaa
