such posts drives me towards them 😆
i completely agree with u 😛
before coming to ragz lemme come to community thing...i don't know its intentional or whatever, but m hating the fact that always one side is being portrayed showing bad qualities and the other always being right or the victim 🤢...this is sick...complete injustice..i agree it isn't reflecting any community, but still its irking...how can the three ladies aways be so idealistic 😕
coming to ragini, the reason , from my POV why she turned negative was that she was a pampered kid and never got exposed much to harsh realities and when she was pushed on the extreme of it by laksh and her dadi too at the very beginning, with further provoking by sanskar and dadi, she lost her control over herself and opted the wrong path...m not justifying her here, what she did is something unforgivable...
but like many a times, i will still say old ragz was 1000 times better than old swara...swara united her parents to whom she was biologically related..but ragini...she gave her mother's place to shomi, because of whom her father can never devote himself fullest to her mother...this require more courage...
though i preferred ragini being negative, since for me old ragini had nothing much to do and negative shade opened up variety for teju, yet , it being stretched like a chewing gum is very annoying...they have damaged her character very much that i don't think all can ever accept the positive ragini back...if they wanted her to be negative, they could had limited it to a track only not making it the backbone of the show...thumbs down...
and i agree that in sns and ssk both leads were maintained...coz they focused on other tracks not on their rivalry...in sns, rashi's only target wasn't gopi but others too...gopi-ahem's story was build up...for ssk, roli-sid's love story and simar's adjustment took the front seat initially...here, as i said, they have made the rivalry the backbone of the show...
Edited by ..Roopal.. - 10 years ago