The question is... - Page 2

But the angle was all wrong for the phone to have filmed her ''by mistake''. But these are quibbles compared to the rest of the trash.
Exactly, Ay, suma, she was NOT bleeding on that day. Prolly an afterthought by the cvs, who seem to think we all have short/long-term memory loss, just like they do.
The holes are so many, it tires me to even start on them. The timing, as Sunitha pointed out above. There should have been more of a lag between the vase breaking and her screaming. Why deny the vase broke and why hide the pieces? Wouldn't it have supported her story?

Lavina, obviously they managed another blooper over the dress.

sri, why suddenly did she think of her call/msg to Krishna? She had no idea Krishna had told Suhani. And this level of cunning takes her out of the poor misguided innocent to a devious, deceitful bitch.

Ranjini, true, Loots also had a wound he acted shifty over. So blooperr, or did the cvs change their minds about making him guilty too, or was that simply a red herring? But why would Loots plant the phone to trap Pankaj? Pankaj wasn't likely to do anything worth catching.

du, the scratch was an accident, I think. And totally an afterthought, I'm sure.

I think Gauri is perfectly allright. If she was mentally unstable, she wouldn't have got these ideas.

I guess as the vase broke Pankaj just looked to n fro and went to attend his call then our beloved psych spit some words and tore her sleeve hurting her but no sign of wounds were present on the day .How is it possible as her nails were sharp enough to pierce and make thing septic or at least a mark would have been left and man its ridiculous as she was bleeding bad.No signs.She was clean except for the kohl being smudged..