Was Omni right about breach of our privacy? - Page 19

Originally posted by: LeadNitrate

I do not think DTs can read pm, even higher DTs.

We viewbies and moderators cannot, Aahana and MP_radha already confirmed neither can they.

so we can safely assume DTs cannot read PM.

I would like to point out one thing, this member sanju, said one of the mods showed other member pming with Jennifers name bashing it.

if indeed this happened and the MOD shared the pm with some member just like that, There is a high probability that the mod was forwarded the pm by some members , who I don't know what they were thinking. maybe to take E-Revenge for some falling out/ stalked other people's AT / CC and got it.

I think then its a serious issue as we are not supposed to do so and then should be dealt accordingly.

But if this member sanju is just plain bragging to make a point and try to prove themselves superior, then we are all maligning a person for no apparant reason.

I would suggest the member Sanju share the evidence of where DT showed him/her the so called pm. if not in this thread, then via pm to higher DTs.

atlast one mod who actually understands what the issue is and didn't just land here to reply n run away 😆

Gosh, if it's an internal matter, then solve it internally. It's not like by bringing the issue here will get you any help keeping in mind we aren't the ones with any power. Question Vijay about it, rather than questioning the members. Seriously where's the logic in questioning members about the policy of IF

@Fivr: You are questioning TM as to why she didn't bring this out any sooner LOL In that case, why did the DTs have the guts to question Vijay about your so called internal affairs. I didn't realize you all needed a topic by a member to raise the voice 😆😆

And what is all this evidence and proof business. The screenshot of the conversation of certain member has been provided where he or she is claiming of having private information from certain mod. That is proof enough for us to raise our concerns since we all have right on our private conversations. If I were a DT, I would have started questioning Sanju to see what he or she has to say about it since a doubt has been raised, thus investigation is necessary. As members we have brought our issue on the table, then start working towards solving the matter than trying to turn the tables around and washing hands off your responsibility. End of story.

Well almost all DTs have answered the question that they have no access to members inbox/ outbox yet some continue to demand for an answer and claiming how its the DT who are diverting the topic. And it was clearly stated that Sanju_ will (and already is) being questioned regarding the statement so one should read properly before accusing.

All other contents being addressed here were brought up by the members in the first place so why state something you do not wish to hear about? It's very clear that only favourable statements to certain parties are being accepted while rest are either ignored or thrashed.

If you should need an answer then let the investigation with that Sanju_ member complete and wait for an answer to be given before throwing hurls at DTs just for the sake of it!

i have heard it earlier that our pm can be read by DT and then vijay said no DT have the access to this...so was that a lie? how we can ever trust this pm thing that this is safe and private as the name says???

Its funny how each DT members r turning successively supporting the others without looking into the depth and seriousness of the matter...,Member security is a very important matter in the cyber world and here serious allegations are brought about the breaching of this member security... Kindly intervene to this matter without playing the blame game and blind supporting...

Originally posted by: Aahaana

Well almost all DTs have answered the question that they have no
access to members inbox/ outbox yet some continue to demand for an
answer and claiming how its the DT who are diverting the topic. And
it was clearly stated that Sanju_ will (and already is) being
questioned regarding the statement so one should read properly before
accusing.

All other contents being addressed here were brought up
by the members in the first place so why state something you do not
wish to hear about? It's very clear that only favourable statements to
certain parties are being accepted while rest are either ignored or
thrashed.

If you should need an answer then let the investigation with that
Sanju_ member complete and wait for an answer to be given before
throwing hurls at DTs just for the sake of it!

When a huge accusation is being thrown
at someone, we can't simply punish without proper evidence. It's not
about 'witch hunting' or 'unsung heroes' but rather about trust. What
the DTs requested (proof) was based on the first post itself so what
makes that an accusation against the TM? If the TM could put others
under the scanner (DTs) without unverified source of information, it's
only fair that evidences be asked and there is nothing wrong with it.
Since no answer has been provided about the evidences (except the screen
shoot of Saju_'s post which is being addressed via PM) then we can only
assume that people are just wanting baseless reasons to target others!

In the case of the whistle blowers, leaking out information to
misguide members is surely a great concern. Because the same DT could be
leaking other information too that pertains to the privacy of members.
Since it has been brought up here, we can't just selectively look into
this. We have to look at things holistically.

Actually, I have read the previous comments.. my point was that it seemed like to me that you DTs were running to the defence of the accused just, because she is a DT/your friend.. even now i dont understand why the tm is being asked to provide more evidence.. the tm presented what another member was claiming about the DT.. I doubt she knows either sanju or the DT member!

the tm isn't the one who is claiming or even accusing.. at best she is questioning if what the member is claiming is true or not! So this whole please provide evidence directed at the tm imo should be directed at the member, sanju.. just my opinion that instead of keeping this, thread open.. you should have closed it & taken the matter up with the concerned that too PRIVATELY!
PS there was no need for you to get so defensive.. you chose to keep the topic open.. you will get various views!

Originally posted by: Aahaana

Well almost all DTs have answered the question that they have no access to members inbox/ outbox yet some continue to demand for an answer and claiming how its the DT who are diverting the topic. And it was clearly stated that Sanju_ will (and already is) being questioned regarding the statement so one should read properly before accusing.

Although I am not a DT member anymore, I can say with 200% assurance that as a viewbie and moderator I never had access to any member's inbox. The same was true about all higher ups as well because they never had the ability to access PMs to check on things.

Here is what happens often. Every group has snitches and narcs. Through my tenure on the DT, I have often received forwarded PMs or info PMs from members telling on their friends. Sometimes it is out of genuine concern, sometimes it is because they are mad at their friends, sometimes they are better friends with DT, sometimes it is because they want to be in good books with DT. There is always that one person who snitches.

Sometimes the info gets cycled through more than one person before coming to our attention. Someone forwards a PM to a friend, and they to another friend and eventually one happens to be a friend of the DT.

So the next time you find out the DT knows what you PM about - look for the spies within. It is just like how some DT members snitched on what was being planned regarding the strike.