We know how Lord Krishna cleverly used the adharm in the context of removing adharm. But Lord Ram followed dharm to such an extent that he sacrificed his own wife for Rajdharm. Here is the beauty where Ram, the dharm saviour also performed adharm on a wider perspective. Was it really adharm of killing Vali? Did really Ram aimed the arrow at Vali hiding himself? Did Ram unacceptably involved in the fight between two brothers? There lies the beauty of dharm.
Coming to SKR episode, I wanted to highlight few of the incomplete beautiful depiction.
1. Ram didn't shoot his arrow towards Vali as soon as he saw him. He waited for Vali to first initiate the adharm in yudh. Already Vali has done sin by snatching Sugreev's wife which was more than enough to kill him but why Ram waited if he wanted to kill Vali just for Sugreev? Here it was nicely shown that Ram, at no point wanted to break the yudh dharm.
2. Before Vali sucks the half power from Sugreev, Ram didn't even took his arrow, why? Before that moment, Vali was lying on the ground and the warrior on the ground w/o weapon should not be attacked. How nice it was!!!
3. Though it was shown Ram and Laxman standing near the tree, actually their were not hiding behind the tree. But after attacking Vali, it was shown that Ram and Laxman came from a hidden area. Is that so? No. (Its completely my POV). Ram was very much in the vicinity of Vali. But Vali failed to notice the truth, dharm standing in his own visible sector.
4. Vali asked some valid questions to Ram which was very well answered. Ram didn't called Vali for a fight, because he fought for dharm on the side of Sugreev not to show off his talent. So he proved that he behaved like a sanyasi even in fight.
5. Vali asked why he shoot him by hiding?Did Ram was really hiding or its the maya of Vali's ego which prohibited Vali to notice Ram?
6. Vali again raised logical questions that his kingdom rules were different from Ayodhya, then why Ram shoot him? Ram's answers were agreeable till the moment but is that holds fine when Sita was send for second exile? There lies some hidden facts. Again I strongly feel its the decision of Sita rather than Ram imposing it. Lets wait to know how SKR projects it.
7. The final question for the day by Vali, wow. Quite interesting. Vali accepted that he did crime in his Rajya and asked Ram with no enmity why he shoot him? There lies the answer in his query. He did crime, does it require only the person in that kingdom to fight against? Is that not a social issue? I am eager to know Ram's reply.
During my school times, I had Valivadh padalam (Kambar Ramayan) as a chapter in Tamil syllabus. Instead of many slokas being included in the syllabus only the sloka where Vali blames Ram was kept as the memory poem (manpada seiyul). I agree it was so rhythmic and with nice grammar but is it not the entire Kambar Ramayan was a beauty? Not only my christian friends even the hindu friends told me that even Ram practiced adharm and blasted by Vali. During those 8th/9th standard, I didn't have the proper reply from my side. But why the following slokas (answered by Ram) was not asked to be memory poem in syllabus? Why is it, we want to highlight only the negativity? Is it wrong with Vali, Ram or Kambar? Isn't our narrow mind to pinpoint or to grasp only the wrongs deeds to show off as an example happened in epic itself. There is plenty of good things around, why can't those be spread rather than the situationally committed adharm for holy cause?
Note 1: This post is merely based on SKR and no comparison with other versions of Ramayan.
Note 2: I really wanted to see Ram not hiding while killing Vali. As per yudh dharm, the third person shouldn't enter the fight. I know this version of SKR is not a distortion and I even know that I am not the producer to have my view on the screen.😉
Sorry for the lengthy post, so I stop it here w/o bringing the wonderful dialogues of Sita. Truly a good episode which made me feel sorry to know that the clock stuck 8.30 PM IST soon.