SKR:OF LOOPS AND SYMBOLISMS #4: 1/08: updated on pg. 132 - Page 77

Hi guys no update today of Siya ke ram in tu coudnt make head or tail of episode so a short summary pls
What does meghnad do and what is precap???
Watched it after a few weeks am following updates and analysis regularly but what kind of story is it??? Sita comes to ram pls explain am going nuts as I don't even understand Hindi.
Jhanvi Di how is ur eye doing?missing ur analysis
Shruthiravi Di loving it analysis especially juvenile justice and even yesterday episode only u could bring essence of it. Bit busy not able to analyse and here to find only shruthi Di doing it.
Where is shabari Di charvi Di and others
But the bg played while hanuman writes ram nam in stone was just beautiful. It captured me today.
Reading update of yesterday episode I was like aha so mata Sita killed a dinosaur in that Yuga which led to its extinction in this Kali Yuga. The destruction had begin therein 😉

@Lakshmi nonsense will happen. That we will laugh off. But analysis has to happen for the good things 😆😆

@sanju posting analysis. That Sita is not real Sita, it is Maya Sita. Actually Maya Sita is shown to distract Ram in the end as per the epic, but I feel CVs here are showing Meghnadh the strategist. And I dont mind. Because Lakshman has to learn his Maya, afterall he has to bring this man down.

Skr ignored sugriv part and laxman gets angry on hime but how many times we are like sugriv right pray when needed
Btw shivam and shruthi Di loved ur connect with today's world. A background yes but right decision

So on a doubt spree shruthi Di and all pls
What was significance of hanuman burning Lanka when ram asked him to find Sita. What message does it hold in today's scenario Di
What ram does is establish dharm but what is the thin line of difference between revenge and this. Of course revenge is personal vengeance and is short lived without any greater good in it but somehow a bit of elaboration in regard to what pandavas do for draupdi and ram does for Sita pls
No problem if I don't receive an answer am not forcing u guys
And what Sita has is faith in ram. We have trust in relations and faith in God. So Sita had faith is it because that she knows he is Narayan or am I wrong what she has is trust???

Yes Di ram scenes are greatly writen
And yes I loved ur last analysis on ram about a month ago. Those are the best as it makes me feel it. And meghnad laxman yes CV's giving laxman importance after long. And if u see today I thought Sita falls down and laxman was not that angry he stood like ram shocked but reaction less. He is beginning to understand na Di. That ur analysis will address. Anyway thanks about summary have heard of maya Sita ok before I ask anything ur analysis will have the answer. So better wait.
Laxman is fast and furious but that's because he doesn't want his brother kindness to be exploited clearly shown today.

7/7/2016

Today Ram shows once again why he is Maryadapurushottam. What is his Maryada. Vibishan who is Ravan's brother comes to Ram's protection. Sugreev, Lakshman everyone is skeptical. They have to be because Ravan is their enemy and suddenly his brother coming claiming to support them will look suspicious.

But Ram says he doesn't know what the real purpose of Vibishana is. But he has demanded Ram's protection. And if someone comes seeking your protection let that person have done numerous sin also it is one's duty to give protection.

So the question arises you just like that give protection. No. If you see the scene just like that you will feel you have to give protection to anyone who comes to you. This is where most people make mistakes with Ram. They listen to his words, but doesn't see his action. Yes Ram shows the seemless love of God who irrespective of whatever karma you have done in the past goes to him with pure heart, he is willing to accept you in his lap, give you his protection.

Hanuman supports Ram's decision with what he have seen in Lanka. See Hanuman is very important in Ram's decision for others to feel confident. Because he has seen Lanka, met people of Lanka. So him telling Vibishna is a man of dharma allievates fear of Ram's supporters to great extend. A good sevak of Lord always provides clarification to his Lord's decisions in a way everyone can understand. That is Hanuman's greatness also.

Next scene is the beautiful Moh Maya of Vishnu. Yes I will give you protection but I have a question. Which Dharma is more important. Rajdharma or bhatradharma.Why does Ram asks this question, it is to test what is the intention of Vibishan. Ram knows Vibishan has made something over and above Bhatrudharma. Else a brother wont come to support his brother's enemy. In Sugreev case Ram had no enemity with Bali. He just supported Sugreev whose wife was in similar condition that of Sita. But Ravan is Ram's enemy. If Vibishan had told Rajdharma Ram would have understood his intention is to become king after Ravan's death. He is planning to give a stable government to praja of Lanka and also take forward asura culture. But telling Rajdharma would have jeopardized Vibishan because that will kind of show his selfishness to rule the kingdom leaving his brother who is in trouble. So as a man he can leave Ram also if he sees an oppourtunity. Basically Vibishan will be seen as an oppourtunist.

What does Vibishan tell. He tells love is over and above all dharma. When love is not there dharma doesn't have any meaning. So he stands as a man who has left the place devoid of love for him and he doesn't have any desire to claim the throne. He is fine just being with Ram if he is accepted, respected for his views and can experience love in the company. Desires don't feed the man.

So here we need to understand Lord has a way of knowing who you are, what you are. His questions you will not understand what he is seeking. But from your answers or choices he defines you. Only the truthful can understand the depth of his questions or the way he is testing you. Because his intention is known only when you pass the test. If you fail, he will keep on testing you till you pass.

Now Sita. She is not real Sita. We all have seen Meghnadh coudlnt touch the real Sita. Sita has a strong freewill. Then how did he manage to send her. It is his Maya. I feel if Maya Sita had touched Ram something would have happened. Like kiss of poison. It is here we need to see the Asur Maya. Noone is able to understand the Maya except Vibishan. That's why it is always said to take on power we need insider information and we need to ensure our strategy doesn't go out also.

@Sanju you have asked big big questions. First let me answer your question on Ram establishing dharma. What is revenge. See the question carries more weight from Arjun's perspective not from Ram's perspective.

Answers or choice define u
If u feel he will keep on testing till u pass
Nothing else except hats off Di
Btw what is bhatrudharm
And Di the way Skr showed imagine if all was part of plan for Sita to die in front of Rams eyes. What if it was backstabbing. Yes ram tested him but our mahaan Bahus in TVs accept whatsoever.
Sorry if am wrong but just felt that blind trust is just never right

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@Lakshmi nonsense will happen. That we will laugh off. But analysis has to happen for the good things 😆😆

Today guys was a very very beautiful episode which actually highlighted Ram once again his dharma. If yesterday was cake, today was icing on the cake. It has been sometime since I got a chance to analyze Ram. Once again Ashish outshines himself. Posting soon

Am using phone so can't quote and make it bold
Big question 😉
Ramayan the message is duty
Yes Di incidentally I was thinking about yudhistar and ram today. Ram knew his dharm take vanvas for instance he had answers to Praja question to Bharat and every other question. He was not stubborn but his dharm couldn't be manipulated. In yudhistar case at first he accepts Arjun words and ready to walk out of the infamous hall of game of dice but shakuni manipulated by his question and yudhistar accepted that it was dharm as per starbharat so half knowledge right Di. And ram he did not let go of Pati dharm even when he exiles Sita I would say as u say by taking blame for exile he vindicted her now and forever. So he did not disregard any dharm small or big. If it has greater good we need to do it we people are so we say in Kali yug at times lie is neccasary but then we try to justify our lie told without any good to. At times neccasary but we humans would start making it a habit by justifying it. Understanding duty is easy Di but action inline that's were most of us fail rightly said Di. Yes In both cases it was developed in action yet it is faith and so it is divine. In hanuman case it's the law of karma.
Heartfelt Thanks Di
God bless u always
And hope not to have misinterpreted anything
Will visit the forum once in a while to get my doubts cleared.
But Di do continue ur analysis k would be reading it everyday and many like me would be there