I'm so proud of Nandini - Page 2

don't know why some members start mocking if someone has different opinions

if someone member think want to find goodness in. Nandini then it is there. opinions what is to. mock here

if u hate Nandini then continue hating but mocking those people who want to find goodness in Nandini is really not done

Originally posted by: pamk06

Everyone have their opinions, perspectives and the reasons for it. This forums is a place where this different perspectives and opinions can be discussed. If you do not agree with it, you are more than welcome to put forth your side of debate or ignore it completely but mocking them or the post is really not the way to go.

did not mauli ask from Nandini Kunal as gift at first place . whole blame on Nandini ?

Originally posted by: mas123

According to her, its not at all mistake. it just divine love which she couldnt control after trying A LOTTT

She is just returning Kunal as a birthday gift - not even for a microsecond she is guilty of what she has done.

Exactly I can't see any guilt.She didn't even take mauli's name.

for me Nandini can redeem. may be it take time to redeem but can redeem . .if person wants to.redeem then he or she must given chance to redeem and that redemption should not be fake

And of course, the irony of the mistress giving back the husband to the wife is rich. Out of everyone in this beastly triangle, the mistress has the least, weakest claim to kunal. First, the claim belongs to kunal as no one owns him, he is not a commodity to be bartered. Second an argument can be made that mauli has claim as well. Mauli is his legal wife. Under the law, she has a claim regarging her relationship with her husband. She has a legitimate claim. Furthermore, they were married according to hindu rituals wherein kunalji promised his fidelty and love to her for SEVEN lifetimes. Thus mauli has a legitimate claim before god.

Originally posted by: kiransgirl

And of course, the irony of the mistress giving back the husband to the wife is rich. Out of everyone in this beastly triangle, the mistress has the least, weakest claim to kunal. First, the claim belongs to kunal as no one owns him, he is not a commodity to be bartered. Second an argument can be made that mauli has claim as well. Mauli is his legal wife. Under the law, she has a claim regarging her relationship with her husband. She has a legitimate claim. Furthermore, they were married according to hindu rituals wherein kunalji promised his fidelty and love to her for SEVEN lifetimes. Thus mauli has a legitimate claim before god.

Nandani has ZERO authority or legitimacy to give kunal away. She is a non entity. And i would put NO stock in kunal s claims of love. Why just 2 months ago he was pledging undying love to his wife. So nandani can perhaps speak after he has remained loyal and faithful to her after 7 years and 2 months...if he ever marries her.

But tell me 😉 how can someone be appauded for givjng something she had no right to in the first place. So no. Nothing to be proud of and she is beyond redemption

@bold-Completely agree

Originally posted by: kiransgirl

And of course, the irony of the mistress giving back the husband to the wife is rich. Out of everyone in this beastly triangle, the mistress has the least, weakest claim to kunal. First, the claim belongs to kunal as no one owns him, he is not a commodity to be bartered. Second an argument can be made that mauli has claim as well. Mauli is his legal wife. Under the law, she has a claim regarging her relationship with her husband. She has a legitimate claim. Furthermore, they were married according to hindu rituals wherein kunalji promised his fidelty and love to her for SEVEN lifetimes. Thus mauli has a legitimate claim before god.

Nandani has ZERO authority or legitimacy to give kunal away. She is a non entity. And i would put NO stock in kunal s claims of love. Why just 2 months ago he was pledging undying love to his wife. So nandani can perhaps speak after he has remained loyal and faithful to her after 7 years and 2 months...if he ever marries her.

But tell me 😉 how can someone be appauded for givjng something she had no right to in the first place. So no. Nothing to be proud of and she is beyond redemption

Originally posted by: Unicorn67

Watch it as a comedy you will feel much better 😆 I am watching as am watching a child channel some sort of cartoon 😆