Shrimad Ramayan ~ Daily Episode Discussion Thread 22.1.25 - Page 7

Hum pagal nahi hai bhaiya, hamara dimaag kharaab hai .

Watch sasta and ghaghra ka meme

Credit to original uploader

https://x.com/Amin1kshitij/status/1882033093651152927

Ram cannot be in 60s or 70s. He should be in his late 30s or early 40. According to books, he got married in late Teens(max18)+14 years vanvaas+12 years separation with Sita. It's fine if he does not have grey hair. Sujay does look more matured as a King now than during Siya ram wedding.

Today's episode less said its better. They could not spend one episode on sita with family reunion. Brothers did not have one dialogue with Sita instead we get so many unwanted dialogues of Soorpanaka. I wish these asur actors joined another show and took leave from this show. How come they could not shoot with 3 sisters.

100% agree no scenes of Ram/luv kush. He just asked hanuman how is Sita ? Everywhere there is hanuman in family scenes. Why make luv kush leave Ram and go with Hanuman to pick up Sita. Ram asked them to stay with him. Would be nice if Luv kush are with Ram and fighting sasta army. Instead we get Hanuman with Luv kush.

Originally posted by: chatterbox

Hum pagal nahi hai bhaiya, hamara dimaag kharaab hai .

Watch sasta and ghaghra ka meme

Credit to original uploader

https://x.com/Amin1kshitij/status/1882033093651152927

Originally posted by: ananya3129

https://x.com/pranjal75533926/status/1882079720164270236?s=46

Originally posted by: ananya3129

Koi Lakshman Bhaiya ko bulao iss Nakti ko phir see Nakti banayenge

https://x.com/cscsphoenix/status/1882071759673024730?s=46

Originally posted by: ananya3129

Hein

https://x.com/cscsphoenix/status/1882069009329512464?s=46

Originally posted by: divine_ram

Ram cannot be in 60s or 70s. He should be in his late 30s or early 40. According to books, he got married in late Teens(max18)+14 years vanvaas+12 years separation with Sita. It's fine if he does not have grey hair. Sujay does look more matured as a King now than during Siya ram wedding.

Today's episode less said its better. They could not spend one episode on sita with family reunion. Brothers did not have one dialogue with Sita instead we get so many unwanted dialogues of Soorpanaka. I wish these asur actors joined another show and took leave from this show. How come they could not shoot with 3 sisters.

Susruta, the ancient surgeon of India, wrote in his book ‘Susruta Samhita’ that the marriage age of a girl must be above 16 and for boys must be above 25 years.Valmiki proved wrong the claims that the couple were children when they got married.

In Aranya Kanda of Valmiki Ramayana, Sita tells Ravana that she had stayed at Ayodhya for 12 years after marriage. When she had left for Vanvaas, she was 18 and Rama was 25 years of age. Does it mean Sita was 6 and Rama was 13 at the time of their marriage? The answer is a big NO.

Since Vedic era, Upanayana or initiation of education was considered as 2nd birth (Dwija). For Brahmins, it was done at age of 8, Kshatriyas at 11 and Vaishyas at 12. They were called Dwija (twice born) after that. Since both Sita and Rama were from Kshatriya families, both of them were initiated at 11. So after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new ages were 6 and 13 respectively, but their biological ages were 17 and 24 at marriage.

After 12 years of married life at Ayodhya, when they left for exile, their new ages were 18 and 25 but biological ages were 29 and 36 years.

When Ravana abducted Sita after 13 years in forest, her actual age was 42 and Rama was 49.

When Rama killed Ravana and returned with Sita back to Ayodhya, their ages were 50 and 43 respectively.

Padma Purana describes Sita before marriage as a fully grown adult woman. There are many instances in the Ramayana to prove that Rama and Sita were adults when married. In fact, until 1000 years ago, there were no child marriages, no forced arranged marriages for Indian women.

Not trying to prove u wrong but trying to give an alternate theory endorsed by people on the other side of the spectrum.

Hence I rounded Ram 's age to 60's or 70's.

Vaise I do agree with the look of Sujay .It's because of the makeup and costumes that he does look mature unlike the teenager look he had when he went for Tadaka vadh.But it's more so also because he stopped working out ( as he lacked time ) and hence gained right easily When we gain weight ,we naturally look a few years older than our actual age.Not saying that people with more than their own ideal weight look bad,but yes,they appear older than their biological age.😊

Originally posted by: divine_ram

100% agree no scenes of Ram/luv kush. He just asked hanuman how is Sita ? Everywhere there is hanuman in family scenes. Why make luv kush leave Ram and go with Hanuman to pick up Sita. Ram asked them to stay with him. Would be nice if Luv kush are with Ram and fighting sasta army. Instead we get Hanuman with Luv kush.

I think it's because kush is younger Hanuman in Veer Hanuman and hence busy in shooting

if kush is busy with veer hanuman, why shoot with hanuman and with Sita family reunion. I blame the writers than actors busy schedule. They should have shot scenes with ram luv kush than hanuman and sita return track.