Srimad Ramayan EDT Week #4 Jan 22 - Jan 26 - Page 43

Originally posted by: Moonks

It's there in the books, I listened an audiobook of Valmiki's Ramayan (though they mentioned that this part was later addition) and it was there too that it was Sita's decision, she got to know what's happening from her informers and took the decision before Ram could take any other decision

Ohh intresting, have to read it then I think summary mein mentioned nahi tha ye

Originally posted by: Moonks

Ram Siya ke Luv Kush by Nastik only

Shivya pathania and Himanshu Soni played Ram and Sita in this one, in case you are wondering who are these people they played Radha-krishna in the first episode of Radha-krishna show

Creative liberty kar itna najaayaz faayda utha liya

Originally posted by: RamAayeHain

Creative liberty kar itna najaayaz faayda utha liya

Originally posted by: RamAayeHain

Is that why Pandavas were also given 13 years excile?

I would love to know what all texts you've read, do share ❤️

Isn't Pandavas also got 14 years of exile?

13 plus one year agyat vas?

Originally posted by: RamAayeHain

Where did you read it was Sita Mata's decision? Just curious to know if I missed something in both Ramayana books 🤔As I have not yet read Uttarkand fully but only points and summary

And yess absolutely the people who does belive in Uttarkand also respects Ram ji a lot because till now every time fingers are raised only Ram ji never on Sita Mata integrity or character because of this decision

Sita mata though Queen still comes below Ram ji in position of power as at that time only Kings were considered the ruler and Queens were King's wife that shall be respected. Like modern times in US Trump was the president and his wife was First Lady. Ayodhya people didn't respected their Queen which hurted Ram ji a lot, he chose not to leave with Sita Mata because he knew no one else would claim the throne and Ayodhya will again become a country with no ruler and this time blame will come on Siya Maa and everyone will question her. I am just curious if we consider uttrakhand authentic what was the stance of women at that time with this decision of Ram ji.

Bold - Yup exactly 😞, I really wish people of that time should've fought a little harder with Invaders, aaj humara pura culture pure and untouched hota. The invasions are the worst thing happened in Indian History and all because of greed and dirty politics

Originally posted by: Moonks

I will disagree to the fact that Sita Maa was his praja, she was not, she was his queen, equal of him in every sense, as a queen it was her duty to share his responsibilities, even if I don't believe uttarkand is real ( Valmiki doesn't mention it and Ramcharitmans which is the next most believable version, atleast from where I come, is written in 16th century, under the Islamic rule, you can't think that nobody would have modified it to suit their narratives) And even if we believe uttarkand, Sita was the one who took the decision to go away so Ram's respect can stay intact, I won't even talk about Ram as a king, but as a husband only, he said he will also go with her but sita refused by saying that people will look down upon him that he left his people for his wife, it was solely Sita's decision and Ram agreed with that half heartedly, but reverse the case for a second what if it was a Ram's decision to leave the palace and go to forest without Sita (not that she would have let him go alone), would not you have respected the fact and said it was not sita's fault, the only mistake of Ram's was he never told it was sita who took the decision, he took the blame upon himself, he never let her bore the brunt, it was him who shielded her from the accusing glances and taunts of the world, at the end everyone says Ram is wrong, he is a bad husband, he protected Sita's honour at the cost of his respect, if this doesn't show his maryada, his love, I don't know what does

Beautifully said

I have never seen such Sneh of shri Ram for Sitaji in previous 2 versions i saw..

After hearing his words and feelings, it is unbelievable to say he abandon Sitaji

He must have taken the decision so that her respect won't be hurt

It is writers and creatives responsibility to bring out the original and truth in the story as much as they can to the public because people take it wrongly and apply wrongly in life too.

Originally posted by: SoniRita

Finally Janak ji’s younger brother kushaldhwaz aagaye, janak said sorry to his bro, but they said bhale hi mene janam diya but paala aapne hai

ya he and his wife arrived but i thought they will show they had some important stuff in sankashya or so but ok

the selection for the characters of kushadhvaj and chandrabhaga looked rushed i feel

chandrabhaga looking elder than sunaina

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

Even i don't think uttarkand is real

Even in this version during Ahilya episode Ram said something like "Stree ki pavitrata aatma mein hoti hai" or something...so idk how they will show Agnidandh and Luv Kush

And after Sita's dialogues like "Vivah daasta nahi , aasta hai , pati aur patni ke brrch mein sammaan hai" will they even dare show uttarkand in the show?

Ramji said -

stri ki pavitrata ka mapdand uska sharir nahi hota..balki uska bhav hota hai

Originally posted by: DiamondLife

Isn't Pandavas also got 14 years of exile?

13 plus one year agyat vas?

12 year vanvaas 1 year agyaatvaas

Originally posted by: Moonks

let's not talk about that when Ravan kidnapped sita in the show, he tied her fully in chains like they show prisoners in movies nowadays and she even took Kaali Avatar to kill Ravan, in this show Ram doesn't kill Ravan Sita does

Ram took avatar to degrade himself and Sita in this show

I did not like Star plus Ramayan at all

They showed Ravan was not killed..Ahiravan came and then Sitaji took Kali avtar and killed him..i got so confused seeing all that